A systemic Review: Are Outcomes of Aortic Valve Repair ‘A Beneficial alternative’ for patients with Aortic Valve Insufficiency?

IntroductionThe young adult patients with aortic valve insufficiency undergo aortic valve replacement (AVR) and are forced to take anticoagulation medications for the rest of life due to prosthetic valve. This leads to many post-operative complications and drastic outcomes. Whereas, the in-vogue alternative of aortic valve repair (AVr) is available and a lot more beneficial as well.Especially considering the surgeon’s skills for selected repair procedure, selectively chosen patient with mild to moderate grades of aortic valve insufficiency and no significant comorbidities present for at least five (5) years or longer time. AimThe aim of this study was to affirm ‘if all kind of outcomes of aortic valve repair are beneficial alternative to aortic valve replacement (AVR) for the patients suffering from aortic valve insufficiency for at least five (5) years or longer time. Material and MethodsInternet search using standard key words of ‘Aortic Valve Repair and Outcomes’ was used to find both white literature (officially published literature) and grey literature (unpublished or ongoing study/literature) with human, adult, English language and studies published after January 1st 2007 as limitations. Inclusion criteria was adult patients with aortic insufficiency with aortic valve repair as intervention with outcomes at least greater than five (5) years were considered. All the data was extracted using Microsoft excel for windows and was analyzed using GraphPad Prisma. Results20 studies comprising of 5369 patients were included in this systemic review, which included 2 randomized control trails, 7 clinical prospective studies, 8 retrospective studies and 3 observational studies. ConclusionThis study suggests that aortic valve repair is a beneficial alternative available for younger adults suffering from aortic valve insufficiency in longer time