The right to silence, although being a long-term established principle in our criminal process, is currently going through a new evolutionary stage, as a result of a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice. The new judgment, delivered on instigation of the Constitutional Court, has extended the scope of the right to silence to the whole “criminal law” area. Indeed, this decision offers the opportunity to carry out a critical analysis of certain institutes of our criminal process which, also in the light of other systems’ practices, conflict with the protection of the nemo tenetur se detegere principle
A person's right not to incriminate oneself or to remain silent and not contribute to their own incr...
In February 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice gave its highly-anticipated ruling in Ca...
Within the well-known Taricco affair, the Constitutional Court, with the refer n. 24 of 2017, raised...
The right to silence, although being a long-term established principle in our criminal process, is c...
Il presente lavoro si propone di analizzare le cause che hanno portato alla limitazione del diritto ...
The Author analyses the law of evidence relevant in corporate criminal cases, with the intent to cla...
Il diritto al silenzio occupa da sempre un posto centrale nel misurare il livello di tutela garantit...
The purpose of this work is to bring to light the relationship between the positive obligations of i...
Il metodo probatorio riservato all’accertamento della responsabilità “penale” degli enti unitamente ...
È quanto mai urgente l'intervento del legislatore sulla disciplina dei rapporti tra stampa e process...
The recent judgement of the European Court of Justice on the s.c. “Google/Spain case” has recognised...
The recent judgment of the European Court of Justice on the s.c. «Google/Spain case» has recognised ...
Relatively to order n.132/2020, concerning the judgment of the constitutionality about th...
Any discussion on the "criminalization of dissenting opinions" is expected to lead to a general rebu...
The Italian Constitutional Court, with its order No. 132 of 9 June 2020, decided to postpone to 22 J...
A person's right not to incriminate oneself or to remain silent and not contribute to their own incr...
In February 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice gave its highly-anticipated ruling in Ca...
Within the well-known Taricco affair, the Constitutional Court, with the refer n. 24 of 2017, raised...
The right to silence, although being a long-term established principle in our criminal process, is c...
Il presente lavoro si propone di analizzare le cause che hanno portato alla limitazione del diritto ...
The Author analyses the law of evidence relevant in corporate criminal cases, with the intent to cla...
Il diritto al silenzio occupa da sempre un posto centrale nel misurare il livello di tutela garantit...
The purpose of this work is to bring to light the relationship between the positive obligations of i...
Il metodo probatorio riservato all’accertamento della responsabilità “penale” degli enti unitamente ...
È quanto mai urgente l'intervento del legislatore sulla disciplina dei rapporti tra stampa e process...
The recent judgement of the European Court of Justice on the s.c. “Google/Spain case” has recognised...
The recent judgment of the European Court of Justice on the s.c. «Google/Spain case» has recognised ...
Relatively to order n.132/2020, concerning the judgment of the constitutionality about th...
Any discussion on the "criminalization of dissenting opinions" is expected to lead to a general rebu...
The Italian Constitutional Court, with its order No. 132 of 9 June 2020, decided to postpone to 22 J...
A person's right not to incriminate oneself or to remain silent and not contribute to their own incr...
In February 2021, the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice gave its highly-anticipated ruling in Ca...
Within the well-known Taricco affair, the Constitutional Court, with the refer n. 24 of 2017, raised...