My law review article analyzes the constitutionality of the Lanham Act, a federal trademark statute. Under the Lanham Act, trademark owners are prohibited from registering trademarks that may be considered \u27\u27disparaging\u27\u27 or \u27\u27scandalous\u27\u27 to others. However, what is considered \u27\u27disparaging\u27\u27 or \u27\u27scandalous\u27\u27 is determined under a subjective standard. What is offensive to one trademark examiner for purposes of registering a trademark may not be offensive to another. Today, the Washington Redskins, a professional football franchise, finds themselves at the heart of the Lanham Act controversy. But underlying this trademark litigation is a deeper concern: whether the Lanham Act itself is uncons...
For more than a century, non-majority groups have protested the use of trademarks comprised of or co...
Numerous articles decry the reach of modern trademark law. This article assumes the premise that the...
Federal and state trademark laws regulate concurrently: The Lanham Act does not preempt state law, a...
Since 1967, Pro-Football has registered six marks that include the term “redskins,” a derogatory rac...
The Lanham Act proscribes the registration of trademarks that consist of disparaging matter. In In r...
In the 2016-2017 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Matal v. Tam, holding that the Lanham...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
Part II discusses the case’s factual and procedural background. Part III provides background on the ...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
In Harjo v. Pro-Football Inc., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelled the federally register...
Over the course of the last two years, the Supreme Court has engaged in a long-overdue assessment of...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
Section 2 of the Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks, lists a number of bars that precl...
There is a contentious debate about whether it is the government\u27s place to determine whether off...
For more than a century, non-majority groups have protested the use of trademarks comprised of or co...
Numerous articles decry the reach of modern trademark law. This article assumes the premise that the...
Federal and state trademark laws regulate concurrently: The Lanham Act does not preempt state law, a...
Since 1967, Pro-Football has registered six marks that include the term “redskins,” a derogatory rac...
The Lanham Act proscribes the registration of trademarks that consist of disparaging matter. In In r...
In the 2016-2017 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Matal v. Tam, holding that the Lanham...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
Part II discusses the case’s factual and procedural background. Part III provides background on the ...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
In Harjo v. Pro-Football Inc., the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board cancelled the federally register...
Over the course of the last two years, the Supreme Court has engaged in a long-overdue assessment of...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
Section 2 of the Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks, lists a number of bars that precl...
There is a contentious debate about whether it is the government\u27s place to determine whether off...
For more than a century, non-majority groups have protested the use of trademarks comprised of or co...
Numerous articles decry the reach of modern trademark law. This article assumes the premise that the...
Federal and state trademark laws regulate concurrently: The Lanham Act does not preempt state law, a...