Effect of intensified cropping sequences on soil physical properties in contrasting environments

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) monoculture contributes to soil degradation. Intensification of soybean-based sequences through polyculture, cover crops (CC), and crop fertilization can enhance soil physical quality and help mitigate its degradation. We assessed the effect of intensification practices in cropping sequences with soybean predominance on soil physical quality indicators in contrasting soils. Treatments included soybean monoculture with and without phosphorus (P) and sulfur (S) fertilization, CC/PS-fertilized soybean, nitrogen (N)-fertilized CC/PS-fertilized soybean and NPS-fertilized crop rotation including wheat, corn, soybean and CC. Four long-term experiments (10 yr) were established in sites with contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions, and initial soil organic carbon (SOC), where we evaluated bulk density (BD) and aggregate stability (AS). The BD was mostly unaffected by treatments, whereas AS responded to intensification practices at all sites, increasing over 50% as compared with soybean monoculture. Differences in BD and AS among sites were mostly explained by soil texture and initial SOC. On the contrary, AS differences among treatments were not driven by texture, but by the soil degradation at the beginning of the experiments (calculated as the ratio between SOC when experiments were established and the SOC of pristine soil). Therefore, regardless of soil texture, more degraded soils responded to a greater extent to intensification practices in soybean-based rotations.EEA BalcarceFil: Crespo, Cecilia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Crespo, Cecilia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Wyngaard, Nicolás. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Sainz Rozas, Hernán René. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Sainz Rozas, Hernán René. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Sainz Rozas, Hernán René. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina.Fil: Studdert, Guillermo Alberto. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias; Argentina.Fil: Barraco, Miriam Raquel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria General Villegas; Argentina.Fil: Gudelj, Vicente Jorge. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Marcos Juárez; Argentina.Fil: Barbagelata, Pedro Aníbal. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Paraná; Argentina.Fil: Barbagelata, Pedro Aníbal. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias; Argentina.Fil: Barbieri, Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Balcarce; Argentina.Fil: Barbieri, Pablo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina