This gloss discusses the position of the Court of Justice of the European Union taken in the judgment passed on 20 March 2018 in the case of Luca Menci (C-524/15) in reference to the restrictions of ne bis in idem principle. The main thesis of the Court concerned the admissibility of restrictions of ne bis in idem based on the principle of proportionality as a limitation clause and its accordance with the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. The analysis of the right not to be tried or punished twice in Article 4 Protocol 7 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms allows us to formulate opposite conclusions. The application of the balancing test as a limitation...
European Directive 2014/57/EU on criminal sanctions for market abuse and the “GRANDE STEVENS” case o...
In the A. and B. v. Norway case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on 15 November...
The research is focused on the problems related to parallel criminal proceedings against the same p...
The cases of Menci (C-524/15), Garlsson (C-537/16) and Di Puma (C-596/16 and C-597/16) deal with the...
Ne bis in idem has always been understood and implemented as a non-derogable principle that gives le...
Article 52(1) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the EU lays down strict requirements for the a...
The principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined both in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European...
The legal principle of ne bis in idem restricts the possibility of a defendant being prosecuted repe...
This chapter is divided into two sections. The first section of this chapter analyses Italian cases ...
The article undertakes the current and important issue of balancing between the Member States’ oblig...
In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in i...
Over time, the European Court of Justice has had to clarify whether and under what circumstances nat...
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PRINCIPE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN THE PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTI...
In the A. and B. v. Norway case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on 15 November...
The case note addresses three judgments the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU handed d...
European Directive 2014/57/EU on criminal sanctions for market abuse and the “GRANDE STEVENS” case o...
In the A. and B. v. Norway case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on 15 November...
The research is focused on the problems related to parallel criminal proceedings against the same p...
The cases of Menci (C-524/15), Garlsson (C-537/16) and Di Puma (C-596/16 and C-597/16) deal with the...
Ne bis in idem has always been understood and implemented as a non-derogable principle that gives le...
Article 52(1) of the Charter of fundamental rights of the EU lays down strict requirements for the a...
The principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined both in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European...
The legal principle of ne bis in idem restricts the possibility of a defendant being prosecuted repe...
This chapter is divided into two sections. The first section of this chapter analyses Italian cases ...
The article undertakes the current and important issue of balancing between the Member States’ oblig...
In the article, the authors analyze the fundamental challenges in the application of the ne bis in i...
Over time, the European Court of Justice has had to clarify whether and under what circumstances nat...
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE PRINCIPE OF PROPORTIONALITY IN THE PRACTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTI...
In the A. and B. v. Norway case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on 15 November...
The case note addresses three judgments the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU handed d...
European Directive 2014/57/EU on criminal sanctions for market abuse and the “GRANDE STEVENS” case o...
In the A. and B. v. Norway case decided by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on 15 November...
The research is focused on the problems related to parallel criminal proceedings against the same p...