Davidson’s famous 1963 paper “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” contains, in nuce, the main lines of Davidson’s philosophy of action and mind. It also contains the seeds of some major problems of Davidson’s thought in these fields. I shall defend, following Davidson, that rationalization or reasons explanation is a species of causal explanation, but I will be contending, against Davidson’s approach, that causality is best viewed, in this kind of explanation, as an integral aspect of justification itself, and not as an independent, additional condition
In this paper, I revisit the Davidsonian thesis that all reasons are causes. Drawing on a better tax...
ABSTRACT Comparing Perspectives on Cause and Reason in Intentional Action: ...
1. Introduction: a look back at the reasons vs. causes debate. 2. The interventionist acco...
Davidson’s famous 1963 paper “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” contains, in nuce, the main lines of Dav...
This paper considers Davidson’s (1963) arguments for construing reasons as causes and attempts to s...
The thesis deals with the question of whether causation can play a (relevant) part in the explanatio...
It is widely assumed that action explanation renders intentional actions rationally intelligible in ...
Two principal strategies for the Theory of Action are examined, Donald Davidson´s and Georg Henrik v...
In this paper I offer a critique of the view made popular by Davidson that rationalization is a spe...
According to the ‘standard story’ in the philosophy of action, actions are those movements of a crea...
Donald Davidson opens 'Actions, Reasons, and Causes' by asking, 'What is the relation between a reas...
This thesis is a critical examination of three influential and interrelated aspects of Donald David...
Non-causal accounts of action explanation have long been criticized for lacking a positive thesis, r...
Original article can be found at: http://www.jstor.org/journals/00318205.html Copyright Blackwell Pu...
Since the publication of Davidson’s “Actions, Reasons and Causes” the philosophy of action has been ...
In this paper, I revisit the Davidsonian thesis that all reasons are causes. Drawing on a better tax...
ABSTRACT Comparing Perspectives on Cause and Reason in Intentional Action: ...
1. Introduction: a look back at the reasons vs. causes debate. 2. The interventionist acco...
Davidson’s famous 1963 paper “Actions, Reasons, and Causes” contains, in nuce, the main lines of Dav...
This paper considers Davidson’s (1963) arguments for construing reasons as causes and attempts to s...
The thesis deals with the question of whether causation can play a (relevant) part in the explanatio...
It is widely assumed that action explanation renders intentional actions rationally intelligible in ...
Two principal strategies for the Theory of Action are examined, Donald Davidson´s and Georg Henrik v...
In this paper I offer a critique of the view made popular by Davidson that rationalization is a spe...
According to the ‘standard story’ in the philosophy of action, actions are those movements of a crea...
Donald Davidson opens 'Actions, Reasons, and Causes' by asking, 'What is the relation between a reas...
This thesis is a critical examination of three influential and interrelated aspects of Donald David...
Non-causal accounts of action explanation have long been criticized for lacking a positive thesis, r...
Original article can be found at: http://www.jstor.org/journals/00318205.html Copyright Blackwell Pu...
Since the publication of Davidson’s “Actions, Reasons and Causes” the philosophy of action has been ...
In this paper, I revisit the Davidsonian thesis that all reasons are causes. Drawing on a better tax...
ABSTRACT Comparing Perspectives on Cause and Reason in Intentional Action: ...
1. Introduction: a look back at the reasons vs. causes debate. 2. The interventionist acco...