Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions
- Hess, JJ
- Ranadive, N
- Boyer, C
- Aleksandrowicz, L
- Anenberg, SC
- Aunan, K
- Belesova, K
- Bell, ML
- Bickersteth, S
- Bowen, K
- Burden, M
- Campbell-Lendrum, D
- Carlton, E
- Cisse, G
- Cohen, F
- Dai, H
- Dangour, AD
- Dasgupta, P
- Frumkin, H
- Gong, P
- Gould, RJ
- Haines, A
- Hales, S
- Hamilton, I
- Hasegawa, T
- Hashizume, M
- Honda, Y
- Horton, DE
- Karambelas, A
- Kim, H
- Kim, SE
- Kinney, PL
- Kone, I
- Knowlton, K
- Lelieveld, J
- Limaye, VS
- Liu, Q
- Madaniyazi, L
- Martinez, ME
- Mauzerall, DL
- Milner, J
- Neville, T
- Nieuwenhuijsen, M
- Pachauri, S
- Perera, F
- Pineo, H
- Remais, JV
- Saari, RK
- Sampedro, J
- Scheelbeek, P
- Schwartz, J
- Shindell, D
- Shyamsundar, P
- Taylor, TJ
- Tonne, C
- Van Vuuren, D
- Wang, C
- Watts, N
- West, JJ
- Wilkinson, P
- Wood, SA
- Woodcock, J
- Woodward, A
- Xie, Y
- Zhang, Y
- Ebi, KL
DOIAbstract
BACKGROUND: Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for...
Add to ORKG