The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to compare the survival rates between short implants (length < 10 mm) versus standard-length implants (≥ 10 mm) inserted in grafted bone. As secondary outcomes, marginal bone loss and survival rates of the implant supported prostheses were also analysed.Sin financiación2.453 JCR (2018) Q1, 21/91 Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine0.993 SJR (2018) Q1, 15/146 Dentistry (miscellaneous)No data IDR 2018UE
The present study aimed to compare short implants with standard implants associated with bone graft ...
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 6.6 mm long implants could be a suitable alternative to longer implants...
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 6.6 mm long implants could be a suitable alternative to longer implants...
Objectives The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to compare the survival rates be...
Introduction: This study aimed to report on systematic reviews assessing the survival/failure rate o...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
PubMedID: 29303816Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, mar...
The use of short implants (SIs) has had a great success, particularly in posterior jaws, because SIs...
The use of short implants (SIs) has had a great success, particularly in posterior jaws, because SIs...
When anatomic structures and ridge resorption limit the placement of a standard implant, the clinici...
The use of short implants (SIs) has had a great success, particularly in posterior jaws, because SIs...
The present study aimed to compare short implants with standard implants associated with bone graft ...
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 6.6 mm long implants could be a suitable alternative to longer implants...
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 6.6 mm long implants could be a suitable alternative to longer implants...
Objectives The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review to compare the survival rates be...
Introduction: This study aimed to report on systematic reviews assessing the survival/failure rate o...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
Objectives: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aims to analyse the clinical performance...
PubMedID: 29303816Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the midterm survival rate, mar...
The use of short implants (SIs) has had a great success, particularly in posterior jaws, because SIs...
The use of short implants (SIs) has had a great success, particularly in posterior jaws, because SIs...
When anatomic structures and ridge resorption limit the placement of a standard implant, the clinici...
The use of short implants (SIs) has had a great success, particularly in posterior jaws, because SIs...
The present study aimed to compare short implants with standard implants associated with bone graft ...
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 6.6 mm long implants could be a suitable alternative to longer implants...
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 6.6 mm long implants could be a suitable alternative to longer implants...