Abstract: Despite being one of the oldest topics in the history of western philosophy, the nature of rationality is still a substantial source of disagreement, especially when it comes to its normativity. Current theories of rationality are either not exhaustive enough or do not sufficiently account for the normativity of rational requirements. In this thesis, I am interested in whether there is plausible ground for developing an initial account of rationality as an intellectual virtue in a way that is both more exhaustive than other theories on offer and that provides a strong account of the normativity of rationality. I argue for a tripartite account of rationality as an intellectual virtue, based on the most plausible elements of both a ...
There is a growing consensus, long maintained by Derek Parfit, that there is an important distinctio...
Thesis (Ph. D. in Philosophy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philo...
Broome takes the debate on rationality to be concerned with the ordinary use of 'rational'. I argue ...
The thesis is an articulation and critique of one particular way of theorising rationality. The cent...
‘Rationality’ here only concerns knowledge, e.g., ways to acquire scientific knowledge. Ma...
The subject of my dissertation is "rationality". In this book I undertake a comprehensive, systemati...
This project offers an articulation of rationality in terms of normativity—that what it means to be ...
Rationality is very widely regarded as a normative notion, which underwrites various everyday normat...
I argue that the why be rational? challenge raised by John Broome and Niko Kolodny rests upon a mist...
This dissertation is a critique of rationalist views which hold that moral actions are both justifi...
First paragraph: The main goal of Wedgwood’s book , expected to be the first instalment of a trilogy...
This entry considers the question of whether rationality is normative; that is, the question of whet...
Abstract: Current accounts of normativity struggle to explain the source of the normative grip of ra...
This article is an introduction to the recent debate about whether rationality is normative – that i...
My dissertation is a systematic defense of the claim that what it is to be rational is to correctly ...
There is a growing consensus, long maintained by Derek Parfit, that there is an important distinctio...
Thesis (Ph. D. in Philosophy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philo...
Broome takes the debate on rationality to be concerned with the ordinary use of 'rational'. I argue ...
The thesis is an articulation and critique of one particular way of theorising rationality. The cent...
‘Rationality’ here only concerns knowledge, e.g., ways to acquire scientific knowledge. Ma...
The subject of my dissertation is "rationality". In this book I undertake a comprehensive, systemati...
This project offers an articulation of rationality in terms of normativity—that what it means to be ...
Rationality is very widely regarded as a normative notion, which underwrites various everyday normat...
I argue that the why be rational? challenge raised by John Broome and Niko Kolodny rests upon a mist...
This dissertation is a critique of rationalist views which hold that moral actions are both justifi...
First paragraph: The main goal of Wedgwood’s book , expected to be the first instalment of a trilogy...
This entry considers the question of whether rationality is normative; that is, the question of whet...
Abstract: Current accounts of normativity struggle to explain the source of the normative grip of ra...
This article is an introduction to the recent debate about whether rationality is normative – that i...
My dissertation is a systematic defense of the claim that what it is to be rational is to correctly ...
There is a growing consensus, long maintained by Derek Parfit, that there is an important distinctio...
Thesis (Ph. D. in Philosophy)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philo...
Broome takes the debate on rationality to be concerned with the ordinary use of 'rational'. I argue ...