Modelling the effect of infection prevention and control measures on rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission to clinic attendees in primary health clinics in South Africa

Aaron S Karat - ORCID: 0000-0001-9643-664X https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9643-664XKarin Diaconu - ORCID: 0000-0002-5810-9725 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5810-9725Karina Kielmann - ORCID: 0000-0001-5519-1658 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-1658Background Elevated rates of tuberculosis in health care workers demonstrate the high rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in health facilities in high burden settings. In the context of a project taking a whole systems approach to tuberculosis infection prevention and control (IPC), we aimed to evaluate the potential impact of conventional and novel IPC measures on Mtb transmission to patients and other clinic attendees.Methods An individual-based model of patient movements through clinics, ventilation in waiting areas, and Mtb transmission was developed, and parameterised using empirical data from eight clinics in two provinces in South Africa. Seven interventions – co-developed with health professionals and policymakers - were simulated: 1. queue management systems with outdoor waiting areas, 2. ultraviolet germicidal irradiation systems (UVGI), 3. appointment systems, 4. opening windows and doors, 5. surgical mask wearing by clinic attendees, 6. simple clinic retrofits, and 7. increased coverage of long antiretroviral therapy prescriptions and community medicine collection points through the CCMDD service.Results In the model, 1. outdoor waiting areas reduced the transmission to clinic attendees by 83% (interquartile range [IQR] 76-88%), 2. UVGI by 77% (IQR 64-85%), 3. appointment systems by 62% (IQR 45-75%), 4. opening windows and doors by 55% (IQR 25-72%), 5. masks by 47% (IQR 42-50%), 6. clinic retrofits by 45% (IQR 16-64%), and 7. increasing the coverage of CCMDD by 22% (IQR 12-32%).Conclusions The majority of the interventions achieved median reductions in the rate of transmission to clinic attendees of at least 45%, meaning that a range of highly effective intervention options are available, that can be tailored to the local context. Measures that are not traditionally considered to be IPC interventions, such as appointment systems, may be as effective as more traditional IPC measures, such as mask wearing.The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (IK) is gratefully acknowledged. The project is partly funded by the Antimicrobial Resistance Cross Council Initiative supported by the seven research councils in partnership with other funders including support from the GCRF. Grant reference: ES/P008011/1. NM is additionally funded the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z). RGW is funded by the Wellcome Trust (218261/Z/19/Z), NIH (1R01AI147321-01), EDTCP (RIA208D-2505B), UK MRC (CCF17-7779 via SET Bloomsbury), ESRC (ES/P008011/1), BMGF (OPP1084276, OPP1135288 & INV-001754), and the WHO (2020/985800-0). TAY is funded via an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellowship. RMGHJ is funded by ERC (action number 757699)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-0071246pubpub1