International audienceThis paper investigates the mechanism of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). Although created as a journal selection tool the indicator is probably the central quantitative indicator for measuring journal quality. The focus is journal self-citations as the treatment of these in analyses and evaluations is highly disputed. The role of self-citations (both self-citing rate and self-cited rate) is investigated on a larger scale in this analysis in order to achieve statistical reliable material that can further qualify that discussion. Some of the hypotheses concerning journal self-citations are supported by the results and some are not
Background: Impact factor (IF) is widely accepted as a measure of a journal's quality but it can be ...
Impact factors are a widely accepted means for the assessment of journal quality. However, journal e...
This paper reviews several reasons why a number of self-references in a journal paper may indicate t...
International audienceThis paper investigates the mechanism of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). Alth...
[[abstract]]Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between journa...
Although the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is widely acknowledged to be a poor indicator of the qualit...
Title: The Journal Citation Reports (SCI edition) with and without journal selfcitations. Journals a...
Bibliometric indicators increasingly affect careers, funding, and reputation of individuals, their i...
The purpose of this Masters thesis is to make a critical analysis of Journal Impact Facto...
‘If there is one thing every bibliometrician agrees, is that you should never use the journal impact...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
Based on three decades of citation data from across scientific fields of science, we study trends in...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
<p>Based on three decades of citation data from across scientific fields of science, we study trends...
WORKING PAPER No. 12/2013 This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self-citations and the ...
Background: Impact factor (IF) is widely accepted as a measure of a journal's quality but it can be ...
Impact factors are a widely accepted means for the assessment of journal quality. However, journal e...
This paper reviews several reasons why a number of self-references in a journal paper may indicate t...
International audienceThis paper investigates the mechanism of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). Alth...
[[abstract]]Purpose – The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between journa...
Although the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) is widely acknowledged to be a poor indicator of the qualit...
Title: The Journal Citation Reports (SCI edition) with and without journal selfcitations. Journals a...
Bibliometric indicators increasingly affect careers, funding, and reputation of individuals, their i...
The purpose of this Masters thesis is to make a critical analysis of Journal Impact Facto...
‘If there is one thing every bibliometrician agrees, is that you should never use the journal impact...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
Based on three decades of citation data from across scientific fields of science, we study trends in...
This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self citations and the practical usefulness of two...
<p>Based on three decades of citation data from across scientific fields of science, we study trends...
WORKING PAPER No. 12/2013 This paper examines the issue of coercive journal self-citations and the ...
Background: Impact factor (IF) is widely accepted as a measure of a journal's quality but it can be ...
Impact factors are a widely accepted means for the assessment of journal quality. However, journal e...
This paper reviews several reasons why a number of self-references in a journal paper may indicate t...