Logical nihilism is the view that all claims of the form A logically entails B are false. I argue that if this is true its consequences (if you will excuse the pun) cannot be limited just to philosophical logic, but it would undermine all presently accepted analyses of evidence. I.e. if logical nihilism is true it suggests that evidential nihilism is true, nothing is evidence for any hypothesis. I end by suggesting that this suggestion may be welcomed as part of a reappraisal of the task of epistemology, if logical nihilism is accepted
Logical nihilism is the view that the relation of logical consequence is empty: there are counterexa...
Anti-exceptionalism about logic is the Quinean view that logical theories have no special epistemolo...
Some recent work on logical pluralism has suggested that the view might be in danger of collapsing i...
As the final component of a chain of reasoning intended to take us all the way to logical nihilism, ...
The historical consensus is that logical evidence is special. Whereas empirical evidence is used to ...
The historical consensus is that logical evidence is special. Whereas empirical evidence is used to ...
The historical consensus is that logical evidence is special. Whereas empirical evidence is used to ...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
Given the plethora of competing logical theories of validity available, it’s understandable that the...
Logical nihilism is the view that the relation of logical consequence is empty: there are counterexa...
Anti-exceptionalism about logic is the Quinean view that logical theories have no special epistemolo...
Some recent work on logical pluralism has suggested that the view might be in danger of collapsing i...
As the final component of a chain of reasoning intended to take us all the way to logical nihilism, ...
The historical consensus is that logical evidence is special. Whereas empirical evidence is used to ...
The historical consensus is that logical evidence is special. Whereas empirical evidence is used to ...
The historical consensus is that logical evidence is special. Whereas empirical evidence is used to ...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
This paper motivates and defends alethic nihilism, the theory that nothing is true. I first argue th...
Given the plethora of competing logical theories of validity available, it’s understandable that the...
Logical nihilism is the view that the relation of logical consequence is empty: there are counterexa...
Anti-exceptionalism about logic is the Quinean view that logical theories have no special epistemolo...
Some recent work on logical pluralism has suggested that the view might be in danger of collapsing i...