A starting point for contributing to the greater good is to examine and interrogate existing knowledge organization practices that do harm, whether that harm is intentional or accidental, or an inherent and unavoidable evil. As part of the transition movement, the authors propose to inventory the manifestations and implications of the production of suffering by knowledge organization systems through constructing a taxonomy of harm. Theoretical underpinnings guide ontological commitment, as well as the recognition of the problem of harm in knowledge organization systems. The taxonomy of harm will be organized around three main questions: what hap- pens?, who participates?, and who is affected and how? The aim is to heighten awareness of...
Work-based harm has received limited attention within harm research. However, as UK, US and European...
In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by ...
This chapter builds upon the authors' previous work, which suggests that there has never been a 'civ...
When we organize knowledge we act. The wholesomeness of our actions can be measured in the proportio...
This article develops a new approach to analysing the technology-harm nexus. The approach distingui...
In this chapter, we argue that organizational evil (OE) is, at the same time, a fundamentally nonsen...
This paper considers the ethical concerns that surface around hierarchy as structure in knowledge or...
As a discipline, IR returns repeatedly to the ‘problem of harm’; debating what harm is or should mea...
A complete theory of harming must have both a substantive component and a formal component. The subs...
What is the relationship between harm and disease? Discussions of the relationship between harm and ...
This article explores the cognitive and epistemic dimensions of a harm-centered theory of evil, as s...
Many legal, social, and medical theorists and practitioners, as well as lay people, seem to be conce...
Traditionally, moral philosophers have distinguished between doing and allowing harm, and have norma...
Two conferences called "Ethics in Information Organization (EIO)," held in 2009 and 2013, brought to...
Work-based harm has received limited attention within harm research. However, as UK, US and European...
In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by ...
This chapter builds upon the authors' previous work, which suggests that there has never been a 'civ...
When we organize knowledge we act. The wholesomeness of our actions can be measured in the proportio...
This article develops a new approach to analysing the technology-harm nexus. The approach distingui...
In this chapter, we argue that organizational evil (OE) is, at the same time, a fundamentally nonsen...
This paper considers the ethical concerns that surface around hierarchy as structure in knowledge or...
As a discipline, IR returns repeatedly to the ‘problem of harm’; debating what harm is or should mea...
A complete theory of harming must have both a substantive component and a formal component. The subs...
What is the relationship between harm and disease? Discussions of the relationship between harm and ...
This article explores the cognitive and epistemic dimensions of a harm-centered theory of evil, as s...
Many legal, social, and medical theorists and practitioners, as well as lay people, seem to be conce...
Traditionally, moral philosophers have distinguished between doing and allowing harm, and have norma...
Two conferences called "Ethics in Information Organization (EIO)," held in 2009 and 2013, brought to...
Work-based harm has received limited attention within harm research. However, as UK, US and European...
In this paper we argue that the broader definition of classification offered by sociologists and by ...
This chapter builds upon the authors' previous work, which suggests that there has never been a 'civ...