Analisis Yuridis terhadap Putusan Nomor 130/Pid.Sus/TPK/2017/PN.Jkt.Pst tentang Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-sama

The increasing number of corruption cases in Indonesia has caused the State to suffer losses, thus hampering national development. In order to achieve the goals of national development, corruption must be eradicated. The rules regarding criminal acts have a different structure from the rules regarding reactions to those who violate them. For this reason, the author raises the title Juridical Analysis of Decision Number 130/Pid.Sus/TPK/2017/PN.Jkt.Pst. This writing uses a normative juridical analysis method. In the decision, the defendant Setya Novanto was sentenced to 15 (fifteen) years and a fine of Rp. 500,000,000,- (five hundred million rupiah) provided that if the fine is not paid, it will be replaced with imprisonment for 3 (three) months because it has been proven to be corrupt in the administration of the E-KTP. The verdict has been assessed in accordance with Article 12 letter (a) of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption.Keywords: Corruption, Court Decision, Criminal Punishmen