The draft Restatement Third of Torts\u27 definition of negligence employs a version of the Learned Hand formula. According to the chief Reporter, the Hand formula can accommodate both economic and fairness accounts of negligence law. Is he correct? I argue that he is, and that the Hand formula, suitably defined and explained, is indeed an appropriate general criterion for negligence. The draft Restatement is also correct in largely rejecting a reasonable person criterion of negligence. At the same time, however, the current draft is deficient in some respects. It does not adequately allay the fears of those who worry that the Hand formula will inevitably receive a narrow economic interpretation. It should more clearly underscore that negl...
Judicial inconsistencies in balancing costs against benefits in legal determinations, sometimes refe...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
The negligence-versus–strict liability debate is over in tort law, and negligence has clearly won. Y...
The draft Restatement Third of Torts\u27 definition of negligence employs a version of the Learned H...
The definition of negligence in the draft Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles (Discussi...
There is a striking incongruence between the discussions of negligence in the legal literature, incl...
Thanks to Richard Posner\u27s classic 1972 article, A Theory of Negligence Law, the Hand formula of ...
trial practice ensure that the operational meaning of negligence is largely determined by juries in ...
What is the proper role of cost-benefit analysis in understanding the tort concept of negligence or ...
A response to David Gilo & Ehud Guttel, Negligence and Insufficient Activity: The Missing Paradigm i...
Judge Learned Hand's opinion in United States v. Carroll Towing Co. (1947) is canonized in the law-a...
Money cannot compensate for some losses, as when parents suffer the death of a child. For incompens...
In his commentary on the proposed Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles (Discussion Draft...
This thesis addresses the following questions, among others. Can two people take the exact same prec...
Law and economics scholars have written extensively about how insurance markets affect the tort syst...
Judicial inconsistencies in balancing costs against benefits in legal determinations, sometimes refe...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
The negligence-versus–strict liability debate is over in tort law, and negligence has clearly won. Y...
The draft Restatement Third of Torts\u27 definition of negligence employs a version of the Learned H...
The definition of negligence in the draft Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles (Discussi...
There is a striking incongruence between the discussions of negligence in the legal literature, incl...
Thanks to Richard Posner\u27s classic 1972 article, A Theory of Negligence Law, the Hand formula of ...
trial practice ensure that the operational meaning of negligence is largely determined by juries in ...
What is the proper role of cost-benefit analysis in understanding the tort concept of negligence or ...
A response to David Gilo & Ehud Guttel, Negligence and Insufficient Activity: The Missing Paradigm i...
Judge Learned Hand's opinion in United States v. Carroll Towing Co. (1947) is canonized in the law-a...
Money cannot compensate for some losses, as when parents suffer the death of a child. For incompens...
In his commentary on the proposed Restatement (Third) of Torts: General Principles (Discussion Draft...
This thesis addresses the following questions, among others. Can two people take the exact same prec...
Law and economics scholars have written extensively about how insurance markets affect the tort syst...
Judicial inconsistencies in balancing costs against benefits in legal determinations, sometimes refe...
textabstractAbstract: In many jurisdictions, potential injurers are under a legal duty to incorporat...
The negligence-versus–strict liability debate is over in tort law, and negligence has clearly won. Y...