In the UK and elsewhere, there has been considerable debate about the use of quantitative indicators, known as ‘metrics’, to judge research performance of individual academics and university departments. We carry out an analysis of the grades that are awarded to research grant applications to explore the extent to which such information can be used for this purpose. Our results suggest that the usefulness of these data is limited and also that similar important limitations are associated with other metrics such as those based on journal paper citation indices
Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement initiatives. Current universi...
This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluat...
Australian universities are increasingly resorting to the use of journal metrics such as impact fact...
The research-related performance of universities, as well as that of individual researchers, is incr...
Using the example of a governance system that allocates public funding for research on the basis of ...
Metrics on scientific publications and their citations are easily accessible and are often referred ...
We build an economics department entirely composed of Nobel Prize winners and evaluate it using stan...
The Research Excellence Framework (REF), previously the ‘RAE’, is an assessment undertaken on behalf...
Citation data has commonly been used by funders and administrators as a way to measure the quality a...
In the UK, academic research quality in all disciplines has for many years been measured by a period...
Can metrics be used instead of peer review for REF-type assessments? With the stakes so high, any re...
The final publication is available at Emerald via http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2015-002
This paper investigates the extent to which the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise, d...
This paper seeks to present a review of the current practice in benchmarking and to outline the type...
The New Zealand Performance-based Research Fund (PBRF) applies a unique set of metrics to assess res...
Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement initiatives. Current universi...
This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluat...
Australian universities are increasingly resorting to the use of journal metrics such as impact fact...
The research-related performance of universities, as well as that of individual researchers, is incr...
Using the example of a governance system that allocates public funding for research on the basis of ...
Metrics on scientific publications and their citations are easily accessible and are often referred ...
We build an economics department entirely composed of Nobel Prize winners and evaluate it using stan...
The Research Excellence Framework (REF), previously the ‘RAE’, is an assessment undertaken on behalf...
Citation data has commonly been used by funders and administrators as a way to measure the quality a...
In the UK, academic research quality in all disciplines has for many years been measured by a period...
Can metrics be used instead of peer review for REF-type assessments? With the stakes so high, any re...
The final publication is available at Emerald via http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2015-002
This paper investigates the extent to which the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise, d...
This paper seeks to present a review of the current practice in benchmarking and to outline the type...
The New Zealand Performance-based Research Fund (PBRF) applies a unique set of metrics to assess res...
Concerns about reproducibility and impact of research urge improvement initiatives. Current universi...
This paper investigates the potential expansion of an indicator set for research performance evaluat...
Australian universities are increasingly resorting to the use of journal metrics such as impact fact...