A decision of any court in Ethiopia today can be reviewed by the Cassation Division of the Federal Supreme Court (hereinafter the Cassation Division) if it manifests a prima facie case for basic error of law and if it is a final decision and is filed within the time limit1. This article examines the scope of the Cassation Division’s power, i.e., whether there is a legal basis for the Cassation Division to review cases settled by state courts in accordance with state laws; if there is a legal backing for such judicial exercise, and whether it is objectionable in principle as well as for pragmatic reasons
This article examines the jurisprudence of the Council of Constitutional Inquiry (CCI) and the House...
The object of this paper is to inform those concerned with the administration of justice in Ethiopia...
State laws employ different approaches in addressing the effect of pluralistic normative ordering in...
In many parts of Ethiopia, land is the base for economic resources and prestige, as provided under t...
‘Presumption’ is an ambiguous term that one often finds in substantive and procedural laws. The cont...
This Article examines African constitutional courts’ jurisprudence—that is, jurisprudence of courts ...
‘Presumption’ is an ambiguous term that one often finds in substantive and procedural laws. The cont...
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights has the required substantive basis to function, and h...
The role of arbitration in settling disputes which involves national and transnational commercial tr...
Part I traces the evolution of Ethiopia\u27s constitutional human rights guarantees in each of the c...
Ethiopia has ratified several human rights instruments that guarantee the right to fair trial. The f...
The cases we discuss in this article raise fundamental questions about access to justice. Inefficien...
The role of arbitration in settling disputes which involves national and transnational commercial tr...
Ethiopia in her journey from an imperial regime to a Federal Democratic Republic polity has witnesse...
This article finds that high-ranking officials within the judiciary and executive, heads of some org...
This article examines the jurisprudence of the Council of Constitutional Inquiry (CCI) and the House...
The object of this paper is to inform those concerned with the administration of justice in Ethiopia...
State laws employ different approaches in addressing the effect of pluralistic normative ordering in...
In many parts of Ethiopia, land is the base for economic resources and prestige, as provided under t...
‘Presumption’ is an ambiguous term that one often finds in substantive and procedural laws. The cont...
This Article examines African constitutional courts’ jurisprudence—that is, jurisprudence of courts ...
‘Presumption’ is an ambiguous term that one often finds in substantive and procedural laws. The cont...
The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights has the required substantive basis to function, and h...
The role of arbitration in settling disputes which involves national and transnational commercial tr...
Part I traces the evolution of Ethiopia\u27s constitutional human rights guarantees in each of the c...
Ethiopia has ratified several human rights instruments that guarantee the right to fair trial. The f...
The cases we discuss in this article raise fundamental questions about access to justice. Inefficien...
The role of arbitration in settling disputes which involves national and transnational commercial tr...
Ethiopia in her journey from an imperial regime to a Federal Democratic Republic polity has witnesse...
This article finds that high-ranking officials within the judiciary and executive, heads of some org...
This article examines the jurisprudence of the Council of Constitutional Inquiry (CCI) and the House...
The object of this paper is to inform those concerned with the administration of justice in Ethiopia...
State laws employ different approaches in addressing the effect of pluralistic normative ordering in...