Against the backdrop of Olatunji Ojo’s recent submission that the slavetrade was not significant in Ikale pre-colonial history, this paper reinterrogatesthe memories of slavery and the slave trade in Ikaleland. It alsoexamines the antiquity of Ikale’s Yoruba ethnic identity and dismisses Ojo’sclaim that the Ikale were originally Edoid. Significantly, the paper correctsan avalanche of historically inaccurate, misleading and contradictoryassertions made by Ojo and reveals that Ojo’s so-called modificationsmerely reflect his ignorance of the history of the Ikale, Ilaje, Apoi, Izon andIdanre. Methodologically, the work also accuses Ojo of trying to renderjaundiced archival data on the Ikale sacrosanct. Thus, by celebrati...