The affinity between our perception of ultimate reality and our judgement of what we find in the world with respect to the method of science cannot be contravened. That means, if science must be resultoriented, then there must be a definite method for achieving that aim. But it must be said here that themethod of science may not be codified. Thus, we shall define scientific method as the decision rules that guide the scientist in making his decisions or a perceived system of procedural rules. Against this backdrop, this paper attempts to defend the thesis that instrumentalism can and should, in fact, be accepted as a method of scientific investigation
The central theme running throughout this outstanding new survey is the nature of the philosophical ...
Abstract. This paper is part of an attempt to explain the distinctive status of modern science withi...
In two recent papers, I criticized Ronald N. Giere's and Larry Laudan's arguments for 'naturalizing'...
The logical empiricists said some good things about epistemology and scientific method. However, the...
This study centers on the issue of scientific realism, the philosophical stance that commits to the ...
Scientific realism holds that scientific theories are approximations of universal truths about reali...
A methodology of science must satisfy two requirements: (i) It must be ampliative: the theories whic...
With the continual growth of scientific knowledge and ever-increasing arguments for science as the e...
The thrill and adventure of science are exemplified by relativity theory. Development of any science...
As I define it, methodological theism is the position that, for the purposes of doing science (or em...
Any division between scientific practice and a metalevel of the methods and goals of science is larg...
Philosophers of science are divided over the interpretations of scientific normativity. Larry Laudan...
This paper first describes three different views of instrumentalism, discusses the appropriateness o...
ABSTRACT. Traditional attempts to delineate the distinctive rationality of modern science have taken...
Scientific progress can be credited to creative scientists, who constantly ideate new theories and e...
The central theme running throughout this outstanding new survey is the nature of the philosophical ...
Abstract. This paper is part of an attempt to explain the distinctive status of modern science withi...
In two recent papers, I criticized Ronald N. Giere's and Larry Laudan's arguments for 'naturalizing'...
The logical empiricists said some good things about epistemology and scientific method. However, the...
This study centers on the issue of scientific realism, the philosophical stance that commits to the ...
Scientific realism holds that scientific theories are approximations of universal truths about reali...
A methodology of science must satisfy two requirements: (i) It must be ampliative: the theories whic...
With the continual growth of scientific knowledge and ever-increasing arguments for science as the e...
The thrill and adventure of science are exemplified by relativity theory. Development of any science...
As I define it, methodological theism is the position that, for the purposes of doing science (or em...
Any division between scientific practice and a metalevel of the methods and goals of science is larg...
Philosophers of science are divided over the interpretations of scientific normativity. Larry Laudan...
This paper first describes three different views of instrumentalism, discusses the appropriateness o...
ABSTRACT. Traditional attempts to delineate the distinctive rationality of modern science have taken...
Scientific progress can be credited to creative scientists, who constantly ideate new theories and e...
The central theme running throughout this outstanding new survey is the nature of the philosophical ...
Abstract. This paper is part of an attempt to explain the distinctive status of modern science withi...
In two recent papers, I criticized Ronald N. Giere's and Larry Laudan's arguments for 'naturalizing'...