As one commentator has uncomfortably noted, in the 1980\u27s, courts seemed inclined to develop and use theories of liability, which ensured that the risk of injury and loss was transferred from consumer victims to manufacturers and then, through the price mechanism, to the community-at-large. That was a time when courts seemed to be comfortable applying product liability without fault, and holding manufacturers as insurers even for those products, which previously would not have been considered \u27defective\u27 in design, in manufacture, or in marketing. Since then, courts have scaled the doctrine back
The evolution and application of product liability law in the past fifteen years represents one of t...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...
As one commentator has uncomfortably noted, in the 1980's, courts seemed inclined to develop and use...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
Judicial decisions, as well as statutory enactments, have removed many of the traditional stumbling ...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
The adoption of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts in 1965 is commonly viewed as init...
Much has been written by judges and scholars about abrogation of both the requirement of privity for...
Most revolutions are noisy, tumultuous affairs. This is as true of significant shifts in legal doctr...
This article argues that the Third Restatement of Products Liability, far from accomplishing its goa...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...
In Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories the Supreme Court of California created the market share liability...
To date, no jurisdiction has adopted the useful life defense as part of its common law. Perhaps the...
Strict liability in tort has occupied the core of modern products liability doctrine ever since Dean...
The evolution and application of product liability law in the past fifteen years represents one of t...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...
As one commentator has uncomfortably noted, in the 1980's, courts seemed inclined to develop and use...
Since the citadel of privity first crumbled for manufacturers of defective products decades ago, sta...
Judicial decisions, as well as statutory enactments, have removed many of the traditional stumbling ...
Strict liability has always been the heart and soul of American products liability law. As early as ...
The adoption of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts in 1965 is commonly viewed as init...
Much has been written by judges and scholars about abrogation of both the requirement of privity for...
Most revolutions are noisy, tumultuous affairs. This is as true of significant shifts in legal doctr...
This article argues that the Third Restatement of Products Liability, far from accomplishing its goa...
This article draws out the products liability debate and the push for settlements over litigation in...
In Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories the Supreme Court of California created the market share liability...
To date, no jurisdiction has adopted the useful life defense as part of its common law. Perhaps the...
Strict liability in tort has occupied the core of modern products liability doctrine ever since Dean...
The evolution and application of product liability law in the past fifteen years represents one of t...
The author discusses and compares the various theories of recovery available in a product liability ...
The past decade has seen dramatic developments in the law of products liability. There has been libe...