I have been a federal court of appeals judge for thirty years, and naturally over this long span of time I have formed judgments about how federal court of appeals judges should go about deciding cases, what their judicial opinions should be like (which raises the issue of how judges should use staff, consisting mainly of law clerks), and how lawyers should brief and argue cases in these courts. My purpose in this article is to distill my beliefs concerning opinions and advocacy into practical advice for federal court of appeals judges, their law clerks, and the lawyers who practice before these courts
Producing well-written reasoned judgments (a term that is used herein to denote both trial court dec...
This Article reports the results of a survey of a diverse group of forty-two federal appellate judge...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
The privilege of being a federal circuit judge allows, and indeed obliges, a judge to bring scrutiny...
Justice Holmes, an icon of both the theory and the practice of the appellate judicial role, once fam...
Since 1793, the affirmative grant of authority to federal courts in Article III of the Constitution ...
In a recent article, I addressed one aspect of the complex of issues facing federal judges--the prob...
Not all appellate judges make the drafting of tentative opinions a part of their law clerks\u27 duti...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
Judges produce opinions for numerous purposes. A judicial opinion decides a case and informs the par...
Judges produce opinions for numerous purposes. A judicial opinion decides a case and informs the par...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
Federal courts have increasingly issued demands and requests for legal advice from the executive bra...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
Producing well-written reasoned judgments (a term that is used herein to denote both trial court dec...
This Article reports the results of a survey of a diverse group of forty-two federal appellate judge...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...
The privilege of being a federal circuit judge allows, and indeed obliges, a judge to bring scrutiny...
Justice Holmes, an icon of both the theory and the practice of the appellate judicial role, once fam...
Since 1793, the affirmative grant of authority to federal courts in Article III of the Constitution ...
In a recent article, I addressed one aspect of the complex of issues facing federal judges--the prob...
Not all appellate judges make the drafting of tentative opinions a part of their law clerks\u27 duti...
This Article examines three of those practices: selective publication, summary disposition, and vaca...
Judges produce opinions for numerous purposes. A judicial opinion decides a case and informs the par...
Judges produce opinions for numerous purposes. A judicial opinion decides a case and informs the par...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
Federal courts have increasingly issued demands and requests for legal advice from the executive bra...
In the realm of American jurisprudence, little draws more excitement or controversy than investigati...
Producing well-written reasoned judgments (a term that is used herein to denote both trial court dec...
This Article reports the results of a survey of a diverse group of forty-two federal appellate judge...
Standard economic analysis of judicial behavior, at least with respect to federal judges, has to som...