Article III of the Constitution confers upon federal judges the duty to decide cases and controversies. The case or controversy requirement distinguishes the judiciary from the legislative and executive branches of government, which make and enforce laws of general application for the benefit of the entire Republic. As Alexander Hamilton declared in Federalist No. 78, the judiciary may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment. For that reason, Hamilton argued that the judiciary would be the least dangerous branch of the federal government. Hamilton\u27s argument depended, of course, on the caveat that [the courts must declare the sense of the law; and if they should be disposed to exercise WILL instead of JUD...
It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. Booker, ...
Although it represents an impressive intellectual effort, the present federal sentencing structure i...
Can a judge exercise discretion and follow the law? Some think it impossible, seeing discretion as t...
The guidelines have shifted the locus of discretion from the judge to the prosecutor. This transfer ...
In 1984 the Sentencing Reform Act was passed, ending fully discretionary sentencing by judges and al...
Rather than characterizing a collective judicial view, this article attempts to discern some trends...
In a prescient New York Times op-ed piece entitled Let Guidelines be Guidelines, written in respon...
The Supreme Court has clearly stated the general rule that sentencing lies properly within the sound...
[The following excerpts are taken from Professor Jerold Israel\u27s revision of the late Hazel B. Ke...
In Kimbrough v. United States the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a question left open in United States...
Federal district judges are stuck in a bad marriage with the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines after Booker...
In United States v. Booker, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are no lon...
Sentencing philosophies and the power to determine a convict\u27s fate have been topics of much deba...
This Article contends that the federal sentencing guidelines-whether mandatory or discretionary-viol...
Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, criminal sentences were rarely appealed. For the first t...
It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. Booker, ...
Although it represents an impressive intellectual effort, the present federal sentencing structure i...
Can a judge exercise discretion and follow the law? Some think it impossible, seeing discretion as t...
The guidelines have shifted the locus of discretion from the judge to the prosecutor. This transfer ...
In 1984 the Sentencing Reform Act was passed, ending fully discretionary sentencing by judges and al...
Rather than characterizing a collective judicial view, this article attempts to discern some trends...
In a prescient New York Times op-ed piece entitled Let Guidelines be Guidelines, written in respon...
The Supreme Court has clearly stated the general rule that sentencing lies properly within the sound...
[The following excerpts are taken from Professor Jerold Israel\u27s revision of the late Hazel B. Ke...
In Kimbrough v. United States the U.S. Supreme Court addressed a question left open in United States...
Federal district judges are stuck in a bad marriage with the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines after Booker...
In United States v. Booker, the Supreme Court held that the Federal Sentencing Guidelines are no lon...
Sentencing philosophies and the power to determine a convict\u27s fate have been topics of much deba...
This Article contends that the federal sentencing guidelines-whether mandatory or discretionary-viol...
Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, criminal sentences were rarely appealed. For the first t...
It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. Booker, ...
Although it represents an impressive intellectual effort, the present federal sentencing structure i...
Can a judge exercise discretion and follow the law? Some think it impossible, seeing discretion as t...