This essay attempts to analyze the differences between the calculus systems of Newton and Leibniz, mainly regarding the foundations and justifications of their art of calculus
In 1682, Leibniz published an essay containing his solution to the classic problem of squaring the c...
In [1] Leibniz published the first treatment of the subject of calculus. An English translation can ...
AbstractIsaac Newton's Lemma 28 (Principia, Book I) argues that the areas of oval figures are not ex...
This article examines the controversy between Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz concerning ...
The ubiquitous assertion that the early calculus of Newton and Leibniz was an inconsistent theory is...
A study of the work of Leibniz is of importance for at least two reasons. In the first place, Leibni...
International audienceIt has long been thought that Leibniz’s conceptions of infinitesimals were a l...
peer reviewedRecent Leibniz scholarship has sought to gauge which foundational framework provides t...
Essa Tese analisa a controvérsia entre Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz e Isaac Newton acerca do estatuto a...
SUMMARY. — In his Quadratura arithmetica circuli ellipseos et hyperbolae cujus corollarium est trigo...
In this article I continue my quest for “understanding the calculus” 1,2 by looking at a practical a...
We give an identity for the Hermite-Lagrange interpolating polynomial and a short proof of Leibniz-t...
AbstractIn this paper Newton’s persistent attempts to construct a unitary view of mathematics are ex...
In contrast with some recent theories of infinitesimals as non-Archimedean entities, Leibniz’s matur...
Do Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica succeed in explaining phenomena rather than...
In 1682, Leibniz published an essay containing his solution to the classic problem of squaring the c...
In [1] Leibniz published the first treatment of the subject of calculus. An English translation can ...
AbstractIsaac Newton's Lemma 28 (Principia, Book I) argues that the areas of oval figures are not ex...
This article examines the controversy between Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz concerning ...
The ubiquitous assertion that the early calculus of Newton and Leibniz was an inconsistent theory is...
A study of the work of Leibniz is of importance for at least two reasons. In the first place, Leibni...
International audienceIt has long been thought that Leibniz’s conceptions of infinitesimals were a l...
peer reviewedRecent Leibniz scholarship has sought to gauge which foundational framework provides t...
Essa Tese analisa a controvérsia entre Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz e Isaac Newton acerca do estatuto a...
SUMMARY. — In his Quadratura arithmetica circuli ellipseos et hyperbolae cujus corollarium est trigo...
In this article I continue my quest for “understanding the calculus” 1,2 by looking at a practical a...
We give an identity for the Hermite-Lagrange interpolating polynomial and a short proof of Leibniz-t...
AbstractIn this paper Newton’s persistent attempts to construct a unitary view of mathematics are ex...
In contrast with some recent theories of infinitesimals as non-Archimedean entities, Leibniz’s matur...
Do Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica succeed in explaining phenomena rather than...
In 1682, Leibniz published an essay containing his solution to the classic problem of squaring the c...
In [1] Leibniz published the first treatment of the subject of calculus. An English translation can ...
AbstractIsaac Newton's Lemma 28 (Principia, Book I) argues that the areas of oval figures are not ex...
.jpg%3Fwidth%3D300&w=3840&q=75)
Add to ORKG