Trump administration’s anti-immigration measures affected dramatically the lives of unaccompanied migrant children (unaccompanied minors-UAMs) at the Southern border. This article investigates how and the extent to which the ‘discretionary power’ of immigration officials served the political objective of obstructing UAMs’ prospects of immigration relief. By drawing on qualitative empirical data, this article finds that border officials and the Attorney General employed ‘discretion-as-politics’ to block UAMs’ prospects of regularizing their immigration status in the US, which was consistent with the political agenda of the Trump administration
This article discusses the political reaction to actions of the United States Immigration and Natura...
This paper analyzes how the Trump Administration’s zero-tolerance policy compares with the history o...
Do critics of federal agency regulation object to regulation in all contexts? The Trump Administrati...
This Article describes one of the most striking features of the Trump Administration’s immigration p...
While Presidents have broad powers over immigration, they have traditionally shown restraint when it...
Since even before the showdown over President Donald Trump’s policy of separating undocumented migra...
In immigration law, executive discretion has become contested terrain. Courts, officials, and schola...
The United States separated more than 5,600 children from their parents as part of the Trump Adminis...
In a unique corner of immigration law, a significant reallocation of power over immigration has been...
This Article explores the many challenges—legal and otherwise—that child migrants face as they attem...
The restrictive changes made by the Trump presidency on U.S. immigration policy have been widely rep...
This article provides a critical analysis of the Trump Administration’s zero-tolerance policy that s...
abstract: On June 15, 2015, billionaire businessman and reality television star Donald Trump announc...
This Article proposes recalibrating the separation of powers between the political branches in the c...
Congress\u27s plenary power to regulate immigration sharply limits the judiciary\u27s involvement in...
This article discusses the political reaction to actions of the United States Immigration and Natura...
This paper analyzes how the Trump Administration’s zero-tolerance policy compares with the history o...
Do critics of federal agency regulation object to regulation in all contexts? The Trump Administrati...
This Article describes one of the most striking features of the Trump Administration’s immigration p...
While Presidents have broad powers over immigration, they have traditionally shown restraint when it...
Since even before the showdown over President Donald Trump’s policy of separating undocumented migra...
In immigration law, executive discretion has become contested terrain. Courts, officials, and schola...
The United States separated more than 5,600 children from their parents as part of the Trump Adminis...
In a unique corner of immigration law, a significant reallocation of power over immigration has been...
This Article explores the many challenges—legal and otherwise—that child migrants face as they attem...
The restrictive changes made by the Trump presidency on U.S. immigration policy have been widely rep...
This article provides a critical analysis of the Trump Administration’s zero-tolerance policy that s...
abstract: On June 15, 2015, billionaire businessman and reality television star Donald Trump announc...
This Article proposes recalibrating the separation of powers between the political branches in the c...
Congress\u27s plenary power to regulate immigration sharply limits the judiciary\u27s involvement in...
This article discusses the political reaction to actions of the United States Immigration and Natura...
This paper analyzes how the Trump Administration’s zero-tolerance policy compares with the history o...
Do critics of federal agency regulation object to regulation in all contexts? The Trump Administrati...