Exploring the Contribution of Grassroots Innovations to Justice: Using the Capability Approach to Normatively Address Bottom-Up Sustainable Transitions Practices

[EN] There is growing interest in the potential of grassroots innovations for the transition towards more just and sustainable societies. Nevertheless, there is lack of clear normative discussion regarding these processes. The paper strives to propose and test a framework that enables an analysis of how and in which sense specific grassroots innovation processes may be contributing to the construction of more just societies. To this end, we connect elements of the multi-level perspective on sociotechnical transitions (frequently used in the analysis of grassroots innovations) with elements of the capability approach, which offers a multi-dimensional perspective to justice. The framework is used to address two purposively selected empirical cases in two key sectors in Spain: an energy cooperative and a food purchasing group. We draw on the information of 25 individual interviews with members of these two cases, on observation, and on secondary sources. Information was processed by means of a qualitative content analysis. We draw on predefined categories from the framework, which was refined during the analysis. The paper illustrates that grassroots innovations may be contributing to justice in several aspects: they expand capabilities in different dimensions, improve public reasoning processes, and create better structural conditions for human flourishing. Nevertheless, these processes are not free of tensions and contradictions.This research was funded by the Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad, Plan Estatal de Investigacion, grant number CSO2013-41985-R.Belda-Miquel, S.; Pellicer-Sifres, V.; Boni Aristizábal, A. (2020). Exploring the Contribution of Grassroots Innovations to Justice: Using the Capability Approach to Normatively Address Bottom-Up Sustainable Transitions Practices. Sustainability. 12(9):1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093617120129Bennett, W. L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20-39. doi:10.1177/0002716212451428De Moor, J., Marien, S., & Hooghe, M. (2017). WHY ONLY SOME LIFESTYLE ACTIVISTS AVOID STATE-ORIENTED POLITICS: A CASE STUDY IN THE BELGIAN ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT*. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22(2), 245-264. doi:10.17813/1086-671x-22-2-245Eckersley, R. (2019). Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: looking back, looking forward. Environmental Politics, 29(2), 214-234. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1594536Yates, L. (2015). Everyday politics, social practices and movement networks: daily life in Barcelona’s social centres. The British Journal of Sociology, 66(2), 236-258. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12101Smith, A., Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Martiskainen, M., & Seyfang, G. (2015). Making the most of community energies: Three perspectives on grassroots innovation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(2), 407-432. doi:10.1177/0308518x15597908Hossain, M. (2016). Grassroots innovation: A systematic review of two decades of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 973-981. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.140Pansera, M., & Sarkar, S. (2016). Crafting Sustainable Development Solutions: Frugal Innovations of Grassroots Entrepreneurs. Sustainability, 8(1), 51. doi:10.3390/su8010051Hossain, M. (2018). Grassroots innovation: The state of the art and future perspectives. Technology in Society, 55, 63-69. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.06.008Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2013). Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 868-880. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008Pellicer-Sifres, V., Belda-Miquel, S., López-Fogués, A., & Boni Aristizábal, A. (2017). Grassroots Social Innovation for Human Development: An Analysis of Alternative Food Networks in the City of Valencia (Spain). Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2), 258-274. doi:10.1080/19452829.2016.1270916Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584-603. doi:10.1080/09644010701419121Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2013). Desperately seeking niches: Grassroots innovations and niche development in the community currency field. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 881-891. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.007BIJMAN, J., & ILIOPOULOS, C. (2014). FARMERS’ COOPERATIVES IN THE EU: POLICIES, STRATEGIES, AND ORGANIZATION. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(4), 497-508. doi:10.1111/apce.12048Van der Have, R. P., & Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.06.010Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2013). Of solar collectors, wind power, and car sharing: Comparing and understanding successful cases of grassroots innovations. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 856-867. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.007Feola, G., & Nunes, R. (2014). Success and failure of grassroots innovations for addressing climate change: The case of the Transition Movement. Global Environmental Change, 24, 232-250. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.011Zapata Campos, M. J., & Zapata, P. (2017). Infiltrating citizen-driven initiatives for sustainability. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 1055-1078. doi:10.1080/09644016.2017.1352592Schot, J., & Steinmueller, W. E. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011Martin, C. J., & Upham, P. (2016). Grassroots social innovation and the mobilisation of values in collaborative consumption: a conceptual model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 204-213. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.062Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B., & van Vuuren, D. (2015). Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239-253. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010Jenkins, K., Sovacool, B. K., & McCauley, D. (2018). Humanizing sociotechnical transitions through energy justice: An ethical framework for global transformative change. Energy Policy, 117, 66-74. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002Edwards, G. A. S., Reid, L., & Hunter, C. (2016). Environmental justice, capabilities, and the theorization of well-being. Progress in Human Geography, 40(6), 754-769. doi:10.1177/0309132515620850Robeyns, I. (2016). Capabilitarianism. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17(3), 397-414. doi:10.1080/19452829.2016.1145631Schlosberg, D., & Carruthers, D. (2010). Indigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities. Global Environmental Politics, 10(4), 12-35. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00029Ballet, J., Koffi, J.-M., & Pelenc, J. (2013). Environment, justice and the capability approach. Ecological Economics, 85, 28-34. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.10.010Deneulin, S. (2011). Development and the Limits of Amartya Sen’sThe Idea of Justice. Third World Quarterly, 32(4), 787-797. doi:10.1080/01436597.2011.567008Nussbaum, M. (2003). CAPABILITIES AS FUNDAMENTAL ENTITLEMENTS: SEN AND SOCIAL JUSTICE. Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 33-59. doi:10.1080/1354570022000077926Walker, G. (2009). Environmental Justice and Normative Thinking. Antipode, 41(1), 203-205. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00663.xGeels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495-510. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435-448. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00062-8Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15-31. doi:10.1108/14636680110803003Moragues-Faus, A. (2017). Problematising justice definitions in public food security debates: Towards global and participative food justices. Geoforum, 84, 95-106. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.007Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93-117. doi:10.1080/146498805200034266Gasper, D. (2007). What is the capability approach? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(3), 335-359. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.001Muraca, B. (2012). Towards a fair degrowth-society: Justice and the right to a ‘good life’ beyond growth. Futures, 44(6), 535-545. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2012.03.014Claassen, R. (2016). An Agency-Based Capability Theory of Justice. European Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 1279-1304. doi:10.1111/ejop.12195Osmani, S. R. (2010). Theory of Justice for an Imperfect World: Exploring Amartya Sen’s Idea of Justice. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 11(4), 599-607. doi:10.1080/19452829.2010.520965Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(3), 381-400. doi:10.1068/c10222Som Energia, Qui Som?https://www.somenergia.coop/ca/qui-som/#quefe