Computational Study of Urea-Water Solution Sprays for the Analysis of the Injection Process in SCR-like Conditions

This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02494.[EN] Exhaust after-treatment devices for NOx reduction have become mandatory for achieving the strict diesel emission standards. The selective catalytic reduction (SCR) method has proven to be efficient in this task. Nonetheless, in order to improve the efficiency of the system, the urea-water solution (UWS) injection process needs to be properly characterized due to the limited geometry of the exhaust line and its flow conditions. In combination with the experimental analysis into the system in a dedicated test rig, computational fluid dynamics studies provide better insights into the physical phenomena. Therefore, the main objective of this investigation is to achieve validated droplet size and velocity distributions in the simulation when compared to experiments. Three different positions along the spray are evaluated for that. The methodology adopted includes an Eulerian-Lagrangian approach to study the UWS spray. The results obtained with it show a proper experimental validation as well as the Sauter mean diameter distribution for the conditions tested. The proposed model accurately reproduces the main spray characteristics for different injection pressures and ambient conditions. Thus, the main conclusions obtained sum up in a good methodology for predicting UWS sprays in SCR-like conditions.This research has been partially funded by Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades through project RTI2018-099706-B-100. Additionally, the experimental hardware was purchased through FEDER and Generalitat Valenciana under project IDIFEDER/2018/037.Payri, R.; Bracho Leon, G.; Marti-Aldaravi, P.; Marco-Gimeno, J. (2020). Computational Study of Urea-Water Solution Sprays for the Analysis of the Injection Process in SCR-like Conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 59(41):18659-18673. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c0249418659186735941Han, L., Cai, S., Gao, M., Hasegawa, J., Wang, P., Zhang, J., … Zhang, D. (2019). Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 by Using Novel Catalysts: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chemical Reviews, 119(19), 10916-10976. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00202Reitz, R. D., Ogawa, H., Payri, R., Fansler, T., Kokjohn, S., Moriyoshi, Y., … Zhao, H. (2019). IJER editorial: The future of the internal combustion engine. International Journal of Engine Research, 21(1), 3-10. doi:10.1177/1468087419877990Dammalapati, S., Aghalayam, P., & Kaisare, N. (2019). Modeling the Effect of Nonuniformities from Urea Injection on SCR Performance Using CFD. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(44), 20247-20258. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b04149Triantafyllopoulos, G., Katsaounis, D., Karamitros, D., Ntziachristos, L., & Samaras, Z. (2018). Experimental assessment of the potential to decrease diesel NOx emissions beyond minimum requirements for Euro 6 Real Drive Emissions (RDE) compliance. Science of The Total Environment, 618, 1400-1407. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.274Inomata, Y., Hata, S., Mino, M., Kiyonaga, E., Morita, K., Hikino, K., … Murayama, T. (2019). Bulk Vanadium Oxide versus Conventional V2O5/TiO2: NH3–SCR Catalysts Working at a Low Temperature Below 150 °C. ACS Catalysis, 9(10), 9327-9331. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b02695Xue, Z., Du, X., Rac, V., Rakic, V., Wang, X., Chen, Y., … Song, L. (2020). Partial Oxidation of NO by H2O2 and afterward Reduction by NH3-Selective Catalytic Reduction: An Efficient Method for NO Removal. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 59(20), 9393-9397. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06896Nuguid, R. J. G., Ferri, D., Marberger, A., Nachtegaal, M., & Kröcher, O. (2019). Modulated Excitation Raman Spectroscopy of V2O5/TiO2: Mechanistic Insights into the Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO with NH3. ACS Catalysis, 9(8), 6814-6820. doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b01514Yim, S. D., Kim, S. J., Baik, J. H., Nam, I., Mok, Y. S., Lee, J.-H., … Oh, S. H. (2004). Decomposition of Urea into NH3 for the SCR Process. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 43(16), 4856-4863. doi:10.1021/ie034052jZheng, G.; Fila, A.; Kotrba, A.; Floyd, R. Investigation of urea deposits in urea SCR systems for medium and heavy duty trucks. SAE Technical Papers, 2010, 2010-01-19.Strots, V. O., Santhanam, S., Adelman, B. J., Griffin, G. A., & Derybowski, E. M. (2009). Deposit Formation in Urea-SCR Systems. SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, 2(2), 283-289. doi:10.4271/2009-01-2780Abu-Ramadan, E.; Saha, K.; Li, X. Modeling of the injection and decomposition processes of urea-water-solution spray in automotive SCR systems. SAE 2011 World Congress and Exhibition, 2011, 2011-01-13.Sowman, J., Laila, D. S., Fussey, P., Truscott, A., & Cruden, A. J. (2019). Nonlinear model predictive control applied to multivariable thermal and chemical control of selective catalytic reduction aftertreatment. International Journal of Engine Research, 20(10), 1017-1024. doi:10.1177/1468087419859103Varna, A., Boulouchos, K., Spiteri, A., Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler, P., & Wright, Y. M. (2014). Numerical Modelling and Experimental Characterization of a Pressure-Assisted Multi-Stream Injector for SCR Exhaust Gas After-Treatment. SAE International Journal of Engines, 7(4), 2012-2021. doi:10.4271/2014-01-2822Varna, A., Spiteri, A. C., Wright, Y. M., Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler, P., & Boulouchos, K. (2015). Experimental and numerical assessment of impingement and mixing of urea–water sprays for nitric oxide reduction in diesel exhaust. Applied Energy, 157, 824-837. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.015Van Vuuren, N.; Brizi, G.; Buitoni, G.; Postrioti, L.; Ungaro, C. Experimental analysis of the urea-water solution temperature effect on the spray characteristics in SCR systems. SAE Technical Papers, 2015, 2015-24-25.van Vuuren, N.; Brizi, G.; Buitoni, G.; Postrioti, L.; Ungaro, C. AUS-32 Injector Spray Imaging on Hot Air Flow Bench. SAE Technical Papers, 2015, 2015-01-10.Kapusta, Ł. J., Sutkowski, M., Rogóż, R., Zommara, M., & Teodorczyk, A. (2019). Characteristics of Water and Urea–Water Solution Sprays. Catalysts, 9(9), 750. doi:10.3390/catal9090750Rogóż, R., Kapusta, Ł. J., Bachanek, J., Vankan, J., & Teodorczyk, A. (2020). Improved urea-water solution spray model for simulations of selective catalytic reduction systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 120, 109616. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109616Bebe, J. E.; Andersen, K. S. Validation of a CFD Spray Model Based on Spray Nozzle Characteristics. WCX 17: SAE World Congress Experience, 2017.Vojtíšek, M., & Kotek, M. (2014). Estimation of Engine Intake Air Mass Flow using a generic Speed-Density method. Journal of Middle European Construction and Design of Cars, 12(1), 7-15. doi:10.2478/mecdc-2014-0002Payri, R., Bracho, G., Gimeno, J., & Moreno, A. (2019). Investigation of the urea-water solution atomization process in engine exhaust-like conditions. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 108, 75-84. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.05.019Payri, R.; Bracho, G.; Gimeno, J.; Moreno, A. Spray characterization of the urea-water solution (UWS) injected in a hot air stream analogous to SCR system operating conditions. SAE Technical Papers, 2019, 2019-01-07.Sechenyh, V., Duke, D. J., Swantek, A. B., Matusik, K. E., Kastengren, A. L., Powell, C. F., … Crua, C. (2019). Quantitative analysis of dribble volumes and rates using three-dimensional reconstruction of X-ray and diffused back-illumination images of diesel sprays. International Journal of Engine Research, 21(1), 43-54. doi:10.1177/1468087419860955BASF. AdBlueTechnical Leaflet. 2006, https://www.gabriels.be/sites/gabriels/files/pdf/technische_fiche_adblue-_engels.pdf (accessed October 8, 2019).Senecal, P. K.; Pomraning, E.; Richards, K. J.; Som, S. Grid-Convergent Spray Models for Internal Combustion Engine CFD Simulations. Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Technical Conference; American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012.Patterson, M. A.; Reitz, R. D. Modeling the Effects of Fuel Spray Characteristics on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emission. SAE Technical Paper; JSTOR, 1998.Schmidt, D. P., & Rutland, C. J. (2000). A New Droplet Collision Algorithm. Journal of Computational Physics, 164(1), 62-80. doi:10.1006/jcph.2000.6568Chiang, C. H., Raju, M. S., & Sirignano, W. A. (1992). Numerical analysis of convecting, vaporizing fuel droplet with variable properties. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 35(5), 1307-1324. doi:10.1016/0017-9310(92)90186-vPayri, R., Gimeno, J., Martí-Aldaraví, P., & Viera, A. (2020). Measurements of the mass allocation for multiple injection strategies using the rate of injection and momentum flux signals. International Journal of Engine Research, 22(4), 1180-1195. doi:10.1177/1468087419894854Payri, R.; Salvador, F. J.; Gimeno, J.; Montiel, T. Aging of a Multi-Hole Diesel Injector and Its Effect on the Rate of Injection. SAE Technical Paper, 2020; pp 1–9Benjamin, S. F.; Roberts, C. A. Fuel Systems for IC Engines; IMechE; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp 43–60.Gapin, A.; Demoulin, F.; Dumouchel, C.; Pajot, K.; Patte-Rouland, B.; Réveillon, J. Development of an Initial Drop-Size Distribution Model and Introduction in a CFD Code to Predict Spray Evolution Computational Techniques for Multiphase Flows. 7th International Conference on Multiphase Flow; ICMF; University of Florida: Tampa, FL USA, 2010.Lefebvre, A. H.; McDonell, V. G. Combustion: An International Series, 2nd ed. Press, CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2017; pp 17–69.Senthilkumar, P.; Shamit, B.; Anand, T. Breakup Length of Urea Water Solution Jet in a Hot Cross Flow. 28th Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems - ILASS; Universitat Politècnica de València: Valencia, Spain, 2017.Halonen, S., Kangas, T., Haataja, M., & Lassi, U. (2016). Urea-Water-Solution Properties: Density, Viscosity, and Surface Tension in an Under-Saturated Solution. Emission Control Science and Technology, 3(2), 161-170. doi:10.1007/s40825-016-0051-1Heywood, J. B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, 2018; pp 42–57