Comparative global warming impact and NOx emissions of conventional and hydrogen automotive propulsion systems

[EN] With the rise of cleaner technologies for transport and the emergence of H-2 as a fuel, most of the emissions in the well-to-wheel process are shifting towards the energy carrier production (fuel or electricity). The objective of this study is to perform a simplified cradle-to-grave Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) that compares the greenhouse gases (GHG) and NOX emissions of H-2, electric and conventional technologies for the automotive sector in Europe and to devise the optimum strategy of vehicle fleet renewal to reduce the emissions. In this study the effect of water as GHG was considered and, unless other studies, the current European energy mix and that meeting the objectives for 2050 were considered (while technology level was kept constant) since H-2 from electrolysis and electric vehicles' well-to-wheel emissions are sensitive to the energy mix. To estimate the emissions, the fuel, vehicle production and operation cycles were considered independently for each technology and then put together. For H-2, the best production and distribution strategy was steam methane reforming (SMR) with CO2 sequestration for GHG-100 gases and without capturing CO2 for NOX, both with central plant production and tube trailer transport. Fuel cell vehicles (FCV) with optimum H-2 production always produce the lowest GHG-100 emissions and slightly higher NOX than battery electric vehicles (BEV) in the EU 2050 scenario. In contrast, HICEV would need to reach a fuel consumption of around 30 kWh/100 km to be competitive in emissions against BEV, for that, direct injection (DI) combined with a range extender (REx) hybrid architecture is the recommended powerplant concept. Finally, the optimum strategy to reduce emissions that Europe could follow is presented for the short, mid and long term.This research has been partially funded by FEDER and the Spanish Government through project RTI2018-102025-B-I00 (CLEAN-FUEL).Desantes J.M.; Molina, S.; Novella Rosa, R.; López-Juárez, M. (2020). Comparative global warming impact and NOx emissions of conventional and hydrogen automotive propulsion systems. Energy Conversion and Management. 221(113137):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11313719221113137European Commission, A Clean Planet for all - A European long-term strategic vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy, Com (2018) 773; 2018. p. 114. URL:https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/pages/com_2018_733_en.pdf%0Ahttps://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/pages/com_2018_733_en.pdf?utm_campaign=AktuellHållbarhet-Direkten_181129_Username&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua&elqTrackId.Fuel Cells & Hydrogen (FCH), Hydrogen Roadmap Europe - a Sustainable Pathway for the European Energy Transition, 1st Edition, Publications Office of the European Union; 2019. doi:10.2843/341510.International Energy Agency, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion, Tech. rep.; 2019. URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2019.European Environmental Agency (EEA), Greenhouse gas emissions from transport in Europe, Tech. rep., European Environmental Agency (EEA), Copenhagen; 2019. URL:https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/transport-emissions-of-greenhouse-gases/transport-emissions-of-greenhouse-gases-12.Boningari T, Smirniotis PG. Impact of nitrogen oxides on the environment and human health: Mn-based materials for the NOx abatement, Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 13(x):2016;133–141. doi:10.1016/j.coche.2016.09.004. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.coche.2016.09.004.European Commission, EU Reference Scenario 2016, Tech. rep., European Commission; 2016. doi:10.2833/9127. URL:https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/ref2016_report_final-web.pdf [accessed on 25 August 2017].Verhelst, S., & Wallner, T. (2009). Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 35(6), 490-527. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.08.001Zamel, N, Li X. Life cycle comparison of fuel cell vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles for Canada and the United States. J Power Sour 162(2 SPEC. ISS.):2006:1241–53. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.08.007.Pehnt M. Life-cycle analysis of fuel cell system components. In: Handbook of fuel cells, vol. 4; 2003, Ch. 94. p. 1293–317. doi:10.1002/9780470974001.f312108.Suwanmanee, U., Saebea, D., Hacker, V., Assabumrungrat, S., Arpornwichanop, A., & Authayanun, S. (2018). Conceptual design and life cycle assessment of decentralized power generation by HT-PEMFC system with sorption enhanced water gas shift loop. Energy Conversion and Management, 171, 20-30. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.068Safari F, Dincer I. A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production. Energy Conv Manage 205October 2019):2020;112182. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112182. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112182.Evangelisti, S., Tagliaferri, C., Brett, D. J. L., & Lettieri, P. (2017). Life cycle assessment of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system for passenger vehicles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4339-4355. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.159Elgowainy A, Reddi K, Wang M. Life-Cycle Analysis of Hydrogen On-Board Storage Options, Argonne National Laboratory. URL:http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review13/an034_elgowainy_2013_o.pdf.García Sánchez, J. A., López Martínez, J. M., Lumbreras Martín, J., Flores Holgado, M. N., & Aguilar Morales, H. (2013). Impact of Spanish electricity mix, over the period 2008–2030, on the Life Cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of Electric, Hybrid Diesel-Electric, Fuel Cell Hybrid and Diesel Bus of the Madrid Transportation System. Energy Conversion and Management, 74, 332-343. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.05.023Sherwood, S. C., Dixit, V., & Salomez, C. (2018). The global warming potential of near-surface emitted water vapour. Environmental Research Letters, 13(10), 104006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae018IPCC, Climate Change 2014, Tech. rep., Cambridge; 2015. URL:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9781139177245A012/type/book_part.European Commission - Eurostat, Energy balances; 2017. URL:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/energy/data/energy-balances.Boyden, A., Soo, V. K., & Doolan, M. (2016). The Environmental Impacts of Recycling Portable Lithium-Ion Batteries. Procedia CIRP, 48, 188-193. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.03.100Notter, D. A., Kouravelou, K., Karachalios, T., Daletou, M. K., & Haberland, N. T. (2015). Life cycle assessment of PEM FC applications: electric mobility and μ-CHP. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(7), 1969-1985. doi:10.1039/c5ee01082aKeoleian G, Miller S, Kleine RD, Fang A, J.sley, Life Cycle Material Data Update for GREET Model - Report No. CSS12-12, Tech. rep.; 2012. URL:http://css.snre.umich.edu/css_doc/CSS12-12.pdf.Transport Canada, GMC Sierra 1500 Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engine (HICE ) Test Results Report (June).Hass H, Huss A, Maas H. Well-to-Wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context: Tank-to-Wheels Appendix 1 - Version 4.a, 2014. doi:10.2790/95839.US DOE, Technology Assessment of a Fuel Cell Vehicle: 2017 Toyota Mirai Energy Systems Division, US DOE -Energy Systems Division. URL: www.anl.gov.Lampert D, Cai H, Wang Z, Wu M, Han J, Dunn J, et al. Development of a Lice Cycle Inventory for Water Consumption Associated with the Production of Transportation Fuels, Tech. rep., Argonne National Laboratory - Energy Systems Division; 2015.Hogerwaard J, Dincer I, Naterer GF. Experimental investigation and optimization of integrated photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Energy Conv Manage 207(January):2020;112541. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112541. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112541.Nagapurkar P, Smith JD. Techno-economic optimization and environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of microgrids located in the US using genetic algorithm. Energy Conv Manage 181(December 2018):2019;272–91. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.072. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.11.072.Antzara A, Heracleous E, Bukur DB, Lemonidou AA. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production via chemical looping steam methane reforming coupled with in situ CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 63(May 2015):2014;6576–89. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.694.Farid A, Gallarda J, Mineur B, Bradley S, Ott W, Ibler M. Best available techniques for hydrogen production by steam methane reforming, IGC document. URL:http://www.eiga.eu.Dai Q, Kelly JC, Elgowainy A. Vehicle Materials: Material Composition of U.S. Light-duty Vehicles, Tech. Rep. September, Argonne National Laboratory: Energy Systems Division; 2016.Kawamura, A., Yanai, T., Sato, Y., Naganuma, K., Yamane, K., & Takagi, Y. (2009). Summary and Progress of the Hydrogen ICE Truck Development Project. SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles, 2(1), 110-117. doi:10.4271/2009-01-192