Experimental investigation of influence of an air cavity on a turbulent boundary layer using PIV

The turbulent boundary layer development under the influence of an air cavity is studied experimentally using planar PIV, with the aim of gaining insight and building upon the flow physics typically encountered in the application of air layer drag reduction. A detection technique based on correlation values is implemented to obtain an approximate shape of the air cavity and the location of the air-water interface. The technique was successful in identifying the maximum cavity thickness with sufficient accuracy. The leading and trailing edges of the cavity however, were harder to identify, the former owing to a limitation of the developed technique and the latter due to the dynamic nature of the flow and a slightly limited FOV. The ratio of the initial boundary layer thickness to the maximum thickness of the air cavity is 6.7, and as a consequence the boundary layer did not separate at the leeward side of the air cavity. The turbulent boundary layer is observed to feel the presence of the air cavity up to 8.5-9.5 cm upstream due to an adverse pressure gradient. Alternating streamwise pressure gradients are generated due to the curvature of the air cavity: from an adverse to favourable and back to adverse. Compared to solid bump studies in literature, additional perturbations due to a free-slip boundary condition and the unstable nature of air cavity increase the complexity of the current flow. The mean velocity profile and stresses are able to capture the effects of alternating streamwise pressure gradients and air injection, with variations mostly restricted to the inner region. Effects of streamline curvature in the outer region are found to be minimal, while potential effects of the free-slip condition were much harder to identify separately and further research would be needed to appropriately assess them. The mean velocity profile is found to deviate from the classic logarithmic behaviour at the apex of the air cavity, although the flow does not seem to relaminarise. Quadrant analysis shows differences in Reynolds stress producing events compared to the baseline turbulent boundary layer case hinting at possible alteration to coherent structuring of the turbulent boundary layer developing below the air cavity.Mechanical Engineerin