Procedural justice theory posits that the process by which disputes are resolved in¯uences perceptions of fairness and satisfaction with outcomes, even if the outcomes are unfavorable. Within the context of civil commitment, Tyler (1992) has suggested that enhancing respondents\u27 perceptions of procedural justice (i.e., participation, dignity, and trust) during commitment proceedings might facilitate accommodation to an adverse judicial determination (i.e., commitment) and subsequently enhance therapeutic outcomes. The study reported here used videotapes of mock commitment hearings to examine whether patients committed for involuntary treatment are sensitive to procedural justice manipulations. Results suggest that patients are sensitive ...
The shift to dangerousness-oriented civil commitment criteria has led to speculation that mentally i...
A key Supreme Court decision regarding involuntary civil commitment hearings is Parham v. J.R. In Pa...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...
Procedural justice theory posits that the process by which disputes are resolved in¯uences perceptio...
This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler\u27s 1992 review of procedural justice and its effect on t...
Every year, millions of Americans struggle with serious mental illness. Of them, thousands experienc...
This Article compares the levels of procedural justice afforded to persons with severe mental illnes...
There is mounting evidence that mental health courts (MHCs) reduce criminal recidivism and increase ...
The current debate over the “police powers” versus parens patniae rationales for involuntary hospita...
The imposition of substantive and procedural protections in the civil commitment process thirty year...
Commitment to involuntary care is a multistage process comprising many different aspects; legal, psy...
Mental health professionals (N=198) read a vignette describing malpractice case and were asked to im...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...
When a dangerously mentally ill person is in need of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization, the app...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...
The shift to dangerousness-oriented civil commitment criteria has led to speculation that mentally i...
A key Supreme Court decision regarding involuntary civil commitment hearings is Parham v. J.R. In Pa...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...
Procedural justice theory posits that the process by which disputes are resolved in¯uences perceptio...
This article is a critique of T. R. Tyler\u27s 1992 review of procedural justice and its effect on t...
Every year, millions of Americans struggle with serious mental illness. Of them, thousands experienc...
This Article compares the levels of procedural justice afforded to persons with severe mental illnes...
There is mounting evidence that mental health courts (MHCs) reduce criminal recidivism and increase ...
The current debate over the “police powers” versus parens patniae rationales for involuntary hospita...
The imposition of substantive and procedural protections in the civil commitment process thirty year...
Commitment to involuntary care is a multistage process comprising many different aspects; legal, psy...
Mental health professionals (N=198) read a vignette describing malpractice case and were asked to im...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...
When a dangerously mentally ill person is in need of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization, the app...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...
The shift to dangerousness-oriented civil commitment criteria has led to speculation that mentally i...
A key Supreme Court decision regarding involuntary civil commitment hearings is Parham v. J.R. In Pa...
Using two randomized controlled courtroom experiments on actual litigants at court hearings, we exam...