The inviolability of the non-muslims in Islamic law: A comparative reading of modern and classical debates

The question of the universality of the protection of rights has been an area of debate on different levels. This article will begin with a comparative reading of parallel debates on inclusion and universality in the scholarships of jurisprudence, Human Rights, and the Islamic legal tradition, represented by the classical positions of the major Sunni schools of law. By surveying examples of classical legal primary texts of Islamic law, the divergence on the inviolability of all human beings and the two different stands towards the legal protection of the non-Muslims is explored. Rationales will be classified for the inviolability of all human beings in Islamic law, a position represented by the Universalistic school. The article will arrive at the conclusion that the division within the Islamic legal tradition resonates with the other divergences. The inviolability of all human beings, a stand represented by major scholars of law, offers a Universalist lens for human rights that is well-situated within the Islamic tradition.Persoalan berkenaan perlindungan hak asasi sejagat telah menjadi perdebatan di pelbagai peringkat. Makalah ini bermula dengan perbahasan perbandigan secara selari berkenaan kesejagatan dalam kesarjanaan perundangan, hak asasi manusia dan tradisi hukum Islam seperti yang dibahaskan oleh mazhab fiqh Sunni klasik. la kemudiannya menjelaskan perbezaan pandangan berkenaan kedudukan setiap manusia dan dua pendirian berbeza berkenaan perlindungan penındangan terhadap non Muslim berdasarkan contoh hukum di dalam teks utama fiqh klasik. Makalah merumuskan bahawa perbezaan yang berlaku ini disebabkan kepelbagaian perbezaan yang lain. Pendirian para sarjana fiqh yang menjamin kedudukan setiap manusia telah menyediakan lensa sejagat berkenaan hak asasi manusia yang telah sedia diperakui dalam tradisi perundangan Islam.Q2WOS:00053806360000