Comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and speckle-tracking echocardiography in prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes

Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves quality of life, exercise tolerance, and myocardial function in a considerable number of patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block. In addition, CRT decreases HF hospitalizations and overall mortality. However, structural, morbidity, and mortality improvements after CRT rate between 40 and 60%. Objective To compare the role of the cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) in expectation of response to CRT. Patients and methods We investigated the predictors of CRT response using CMR measurement of left ventricular (LV) volumes and function, CMR-derived mechanical dyssynchrony, scar percentage, and its relation to the site of LV lead implantation, in comparison with STE in prediction of CRT outcomes. Results A total of 35 patients with HF planned for CRT were included. Echocardiography was used to define the response to CRT (15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume 6 months after implantation). At follow-up, 18 (51.43%) patients were categorized as responders. Echocardiographic speckle-tracking radial strain analysis showed a significant LV dyssynchrony in responders versus nonresponders (radial mid-anteroseptal and posterior wall delays were 245.1 ms and 80.7 ms, respectively) (P<0.0001). LV radial dyssynchrony, as measured by CMR-feature tracking, was significantly higher in responders versus nonresponders (mean of SDt-16 of radial strain were 232.7 ms vs. 180.4 ms, P<0.0001), and median of radial mid-anteroseptal-to-inferolateral wall delay was 375 vs. 125.4 ms, P