This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like connectives (it is not the case that, either or, if ... then), quantifiers (there is, for all, etc.), and modalities (it is necessary that, it is possible that). It focuses on truth-theoretical semantics for formalized languages, a tradition emerging from Carnap's and Tarski's work in the first half of the last century that specifies the meaning of these expressions in terms of the truth-conditions of the sentences in which they occur. It considers Tarski-style definitions of the semantics of a given language in a stronger metalanguage, Tarski's impossibility results, and attempts to overcome them in the post-Tarskian tradition
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like...
This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like...
This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like...
Tarski's semantic conception of truth is arguably the most influential - certainly, most discussed -...
No one denies that Tarski made a major contribution to one particular problem about truth, namely, t...
Tarski believed that the notion of truth should be relativised not to the notion of meaning - as man...
In his seminal work “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” (1933), Alfred Tarski showed how ...
At the foundations of contemporary mathematical logic lies Tarski's model-theoretic definition of lo...
At the foundations of contemporary mathematical logic lies Tarski's model-theoretic definition of lo...
The interaction between logic and linguistics on the nature of universal grammar can be roughly divi...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like...
This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like...
This chapter explores logical semantics, that is, the structural meaning of logical expressions like...
Tarski's semantic conception of truth is arguably the most influential - certainly, most discussed -...
No one denies that Tarski made a major contribution to one particular problem about truth, namely, t...
Tarski believed that the notion of truth should be relativised not to the notion of meaning - as man...
In his seminal work “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” (1933), Alfred Tarski showed how ...
At the foundations of contemporary mathematical logic lies Tarski's model-theoretic definition of lo...
At the foundations of contemporary mathematical logic lies Tarski's model-theoretic definition of lo...
The interaction between logic and linguistics on the nature of universal grammar can be roughly divi...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...
An essential notion in semantics is that of logical consequence. A sentence P is a logical consequen...