Načelo Ne Bis In Idem u kaznenom postupku

U ovom radu obrađena je tema načelo ne bis in idem u kaznenom postupku te razvoj načela kroz unutarnje i međunarodno zakonodavstvo. Problematika primjene ovog načela se posebno očituje kroz odnos prekršaja i kaznenog djela odnosno paralelno vođenje prekršaja i kaznenih postupaka, a zatim i kod instituta produljenog kaznenog djela te primjene načela teritorijalnosti. Ratifikacijom Konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i temeljnih sloboda i protokola uz Konvenciju, koja zaštitu prava pojedinca podiže na višu razinu, razvija se i nacionalni pravni sustav te se pod utjecajem prakse Europskog suda za ljudska prava uvode u nacionalno zakonodavstvo i praksu nova rješenja vezana uz primjenu ovog načela. Također, kroz pregled prakse Europskog suda za ljudska prava, osobito u predmetima Maresti protiv Hrvatske, Zolotukhin protiv Rusije, AB protiv Norveške i drugima, analiziraju se radnje i mjere koje su poduzete u svrhu zaštite prava i primjene načela ne bis in idem.In this thesis, the principle ne bis in idem in the criminal proceeding and the development of the said principle through internal and international legislation were processed. Problematics regarding the application of the said principle manifest itself especially through misdemeanour and criminal offence relationship, in paralel conducting of misdemeanour and criminal procedures; then also through extended criminal offence and implementation of territoriality principle. Ratification of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms along with the associated protocols, which elevates protection of individual's rights on a higher level, leads to development of national legal system and under the influence of European Court of Human Rights case law, new solutions regarding the implementation of the said principle are being introduced in both national legislation and case law. Moreover, actions and measures that were taken in order to secure protection of rights and to implement principle ne bis in idem were analysed through European Court of Human Rights case law review, especially in the cases Maresti v. Croatia, Zolotukhin v. Russia, A.B. v. Norway and othe