zhihu_data

Data acquisition: We crawled daily user data from 440 knowledge suppliers who provide knowledge services in the paid Q&A section of Zhihu from November 15, 2020, to April 6, 2021, obtaining a total of 14,303 records, including transaction data of knowledge services and personal information of knowledge suppliers. After data preprocessing, the information of knowledge suppliers who suspended the Q&A service and some data missing information were deleted. Finally, we obtained a dataset composed of 12,419 records for this study. Research hypothesis: H1a——The degree of recognition of the supplier’s content (upvotes) has a positive influence on knowledge payment behavior. H1b——The degree of usefulness of the supplier’s content (favorites) has a positive influence on knowledge payment behavior. H1c——The number of followers has a positive influence on knowledge payment behavior. H2a——The amount of published content has a positive influence on knowledge payment behavior. H2b——User ratings of knowledge services has a positive influence on knowledge payment behavior. H3——Whether the knowledge supplier is authenticated has a positive influence on knowledge payment behavior. Notable findings: Our empirical study finds that whether the knowledge supplier is authenticated has no obvious influence on user payment behavior, which is different from the previous studies on knowledge platforms in professional fields. In the context of grassroots knowledge sharing communities, consumers care more about the suppliers’ online presences such as content contributions and user interactions rather than their offline backgrounds and statuses, which also coincides with the saying "expert in civil"