We examined the effects of exposure to pre‐trial publicity (PTP) and jury deliberation on juror memory and decision making. Mock jurors either read news articles containing negative PTP or articles unrelated to the trial. They later viewed a videotaped murder trial, after which they either made collaborative group decisions about guilt or individual decisions. Finally, all participants independently attributed specific information as having been presented during the trial or in the news articles. Exposure to PTP significantly affected guilty verdicts, sentence length, perceptions of defendant credibility, and misattributions of PTP as having been presented as trial evidence. Jury deliberation had significant effects on jury verdicts, percep...
This experiment examined how exposure to both negative (anti-defendant) and positive (pro-defendant)...
This experiment examined how exposure to both negative (anti-defendant) and positive (pro-defendant)...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...
We examined the effects of exposure to pre-trial publicity (PTP) and jury deliberation on juror memo...
We examined the effects of exposure to pre-trial publicity (PTP) and jury deliberation on juror memo...
The experiment examined the effects of exposure to pretrial publicity (PTP) and delay on juror memor...
The experiment examined the effects of exposure to pretrial publicity (PTP) and delay on juror memor...
This 2-part study explored how exposure to negative pretrial publicity (Neg-PTP) influences the jury...
This 2-part study explored how exposure to negative pretrial publicity (Neg-PTP) influences the jury...
We explored the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) and juror age on decision making and source memo...
We explored the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) and juror age on decision making and source memo...
Content analyses of 30 mock-jury deliberations were performed to explore whether pretrial publicity ...
Content analyses of 30 mock-jury deliberations were performed to explore whether pretrial publicity ...
This study addresses individual and group-level effects of jury deliberation and decision making. Us...
Six empirical studies were designed with the following three objectives: 1) To evaluate the influenc...
This experiment examined how exposure to both negative (anti-defendant) and positive (pro-defendant)...
This experiment examined how exposure to both negative (anti-defendant) and positive (pro-defendant)...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...
We examined the effects of exposure to pre-trial publicity (PTP) and jury deliberation on juror memo...
We examined the effects of exposure to pre-trial publicity (PTP) and jury deliberation on juror memo...
The experiment examined the effects of exposure to pretrial publicity (PTP) and delay on juror memor...
The experiment examined the effects of exposure to pretrial publicity (PTP) and delay on juror memor...
This 2-part study explored how exposure to negative pretrial publicity (Neg-PTP) influences the jury...
This 2-part study explored how exposure to negative pretrial publicity (Neg-PTP) influences the jury...
We explored the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) and juror age on decision making and source memo...
We explored the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) and juror age on decision making and source memo...
Content analyses of 30 mock-jury deliberations were performed to explore whether pretrial publicity ...
Content analyses of 30 mock-jury deliberations were performed to explore whether pretrial publicity ...
This study addresses individual and group-level effects of jury deliberation and decision making. Us...
Six empirical studies were designed with the following three objectives: 1) To evaluate the influenc...
This experiment examined how exposure to both negative (anti-defendant) and positive (pro-defendant)...
This experiment examined how exposure to both negative (anti-defendant) and positive (pro-defendant)...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...