Estado versus Nación: el fin de la era de los nacionalismos en Europa

This paper analyses generally the treatment of the secession of states of internationalorganizations, and the European Union, and territories of sovereign states. To thisend we analyze the international law, European Union law, and the internal law. And in suchanalysis yields several conclusions. On the one hand, the European Union through its Article50 has divised a peaceful separation system and Member States agreed to European Unionshould serve as an example. Moreover, it is concluded that in international law, in EuropeanUnion law and Spanish law claims can not be based secessionist Spanish territories. Finally,the conclusion is reached that both centralist and peripheral nationalisms are contrary to thevalues and principles which have served to build the European Union.En este trabajo se analiza con carácter general el tratamiento de la secesión deestados, de organizaciones internacionales y de la Unión Europea y de territorios de estadossoberanos. A tal efecto se analiza el Derecho internacional, el Derecho de la Unión Europea,y el Derecho interno. Y de tal análisis se llega a varias conclusiones. Por una parte, que laUnión Europea a través de su artículo 50 ha concebido un sistema de separación pacífica ypactada de Estados miembros de la Unión Europea que debiera servir de ejemplo. Por otraparte, se concluye que en el Derecho internacional, en el Derecho de la Unión Europea y enel Derecho interno español no pueden fundarse las pretensiones secesionistas de territoriosespañoles. Finalmente, se alcanza la conclusión de que los nacionalismos tanto centralistascomo periféricos son contrarios a los valores y principios que han servido para construir laUnión Europea.This paper analyses generally the treatment of the secession of states of internationalorganizations, and the European Union, and territories of sovereign states. To thisend we analyze the international law, European Union law, and the internal law. And in suchanalysis yields several conclusions. On the one hand, the European Union through its Article50 has divised a peaceful separation system and Member States agreed to European Unionshould serve as an example. Moreover, it is concluded that in international law, in EuropeanUnion law and Spanish law claims can not be based secessionist Spanish territories. Finally,the conclusion is reached that both centralist and peripheral nationalisms are contrary to thevalues and principles which have served to build the European Union