EER and CCR of Mansur’s method [8], MSM-based method [11] and the B-2D-PCA-R MSM, for dataset 2.</p
Manders’ correlation coefficient for Tau (M1) with procedure described in Table 2.</p
<p>The value for the method with the best fit is indicated in bold face.</p><p>MSE for the different...
Comparison of NSDR, SIR and SAR of other methods and Inception-ResUNet on the MIR-1K dataset.</p
Equal error rate (EER) and correct classification ratio (CCR) of MSM-based method [11] and the B-2D-...
Averaged equal error rate (EER) [%] at each absolute speed difference between gallery and probe data...
Comparison of accuracy and feature dimension under different methods based on mRMR.</p
ROC plots of tested methods using the BG570, HMR195 and ENm001-004 data sets.</p
Comparison of correct classification rate (CCR) [%] of each of MSM [12], the proposed 2D-PCA MSM, th...
Comparison of SDR, SIR and SAR of other methods and Inception-ResUNet on the MUSDB18 dataset.</p
<p>The OSR of PseAAC, PSSM and the proposed CoPSSM for different K values on dataset 2.</p
<p>The OSR of PseAAC, PSSM and the proposed CoPSSM for different K values on dataset 1.</p
<p>ROC plots for the WTMM I, WTMM II, MGWT, MGWT I, MGWT II and FFTEMD using HMR195&BG570.</p
Comparison of the proposed ESMC technique with the earlier work reported in the literature.</p
<p>(On the following five result tables, two best results of each metrics are bold).</p
(a) Performance of first step of different enhancer identifying methods compared to SMFM, where the ...
Manders’ correlation coefficient for Tau (M1) with procedure described in Table 2.</p
<p>The value for the method with the best fit is indicated in bold face.</p><p>MSE for the different...
Comparison of NSDR, SIR and SAR of other methods and Inception-ResUNet on the MIR-1K dataset.</p
Equal error rate (EER) and correct classification ratio (CCR) of MSM-based method [11] and the B-2D-...
Averaged equal error rate (EER) [%] at each absolute speed difference between gallery and probe data...
Comparison of accuracy and feature dimension under different methods based on mRMR.</p
ROC plots of tested methods using the BG570, HMR195 and ENm001-004 data sets.</p
Comparison of correct classification rate (CCR) [%] of each of MSM [12], the proposed 2D-PCA MSM, th...
Comparison of SDR, SIR and SAR of other methods and Inception-ResUNet on the MUSDB18 dataset.</p
<p>The OSR of PseAAC, PSSM and the proposed CoPSSM for different K values on dataset 2.</p
<p>The OSR of PseAAC, PSSM and the proposed CoPSSM for different K values on dataset 1.</p
<p>ROC plots for the WTMM I, WTMM II, MGWT, MGWT I, MGWT II and FFTEMD using HMR195&BG570.</p
Comparison of the proposed ESMC technique with the earlier work reported in the literature.</p
<p>(On the following five result tables, two best results of each metrics are bold).</p
(a) Performance of first step of different enhancer identifying methods compared to SMFM, where the ...
Manders’ correlation coefficient for Tau (M1) with procedure described in Table 2.</p
<p>The value for the method with the best fit is indicated in bold face.</p><p>MSE for the different...
Comparison of NSDR, SIR and SAR of other methods and Inception-ResUNet on the MIR-1K dataset.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG