International audienceSociological and historical analyses of scientific narratives have shown how these have functioned in the performance of “boundary work”, the rhetorical demarcation of scientific activity and knowledge from competing forms of knowledge and practice. The discipline of psychology, in general, and social psychology, in particular, have had—because of their reflexive nature—to perform a particularly delicate kind of narrative and rhetorical work from which other natural and social sciences appear to be exempt. This paper demonstrates the utility of narrative analysis of introductory textbooks for critical reflection on such boundary work, and more broadly, on the nature and practice of psychological science. Focusing on th...