Carbon Sequestration, Economic Policies and Growth

The possibility of capturing and sequestering some fraction of the CO2 emissions arising\ud from fossil fuel combustion, often labeled as carbon capture and storage (CCS), is drawing an\ud increasing amount of attention in the business and academic communities. We present here a\ud model of endogenous growth in which the use of a non-renewable resource in production yields\ud flows of pollution whose accumulated stock negatively a¤ects welfare. A CCS technology\ud allows, via some effort, for the partial reduction of CO2 emissions in the atmosphere.\ud We characterize the social optimum and how the availability of the CCS technology affects\ud it, and we study the decentralized economy's trajectories. We then analyze economic policies.\ud We first characterize the first-best policy. We derive the expression of the Pigovian carbon\ud tax, and we give a full interpretation of its level, which is unique. We then study the impacts\ud of three different second-best policies: a carbon tax, a subsidy to sequestered carbon, and\ud a subsidy to labor in CCS. The first two tools foster CCS activity; so does the third, but\ud only if it is coupled with one of the other two. While the tax postpones resource extraction,\ud the two subsidies accelerate it's possibly yielding a rise in short-term CO2 emissions. The\ud effects on growth are more complex. If the weight of the CCS sector in the economy is high,\ud the tax will generally be detrimental to output growth, while the subsidies can foster it in\ud the long-term. Finally, the carbon tax has a negative impact on the output level in the\ud short-term, contrary to the subsidies