This paper examines whether retailer bargaining power and upfront slotting allowances prevent small manufacturers (who have no bargaining power) from obtaining adequate distribution. In contrast to the findings of Marx and Shaffer (2007), who showed that all equilibria involve limited distribution (i.e., exclusion of a retailer), we show that there is always an equilibrium in which full distribution is obtained, provided that full distribution is the industry profit-maximizing outcome. The key feature leading to this differing result is that we do not restrict each retailer to offering the manufacturer a single tariff
We consider two manufacturers producing two symmetric and independent goods. They sell them through ...
Recent contributions to the issue of countervailing power have formally demonstrated that imperfectl...
In this paper, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding the phenomenon of exclusive deali...
This article examines whether retailer bargaining power and upfront slotting allowances prevent smal...
We consider two symmetric upstream firms producing independent goods that sell to consumers through ...
Some commentators believe that slotting allowances enhance social welfare by providing retailers wit...
The Journal of Business © 1983 The University of Chicago PressThis model of distribution provides a ...
Although upfront payments are often observed in contracts between manufacturers and retailers, littl...
This paper examines the effects of exclusive dealing contracts offered by an incumbent distributor. ...
Slotting allowances are fees paid by manufacturers to get access to retailers’ shelf space. Although...
We consider the optimal two-part tariff contract between a manufacturer and a retailer. We show that...
This paper investigates what are the equilibrium distribution systems in a successive duopoly when r...
In this paper we develop a simple model to analyze the effects of exclusive contracts in vertically ...
This article shows how vertical restraints, which affect intrabrand competition, can and will be use...
Slotting fees are fixed charges paid by food manufacturers to retailers for access to the retail mar...
We consider two manufacturers producing two symmetric and independent goods. They sell them through ...
Recent contributions to the issue of countervailing power have formally demonstrated that imperfectl...
In this paper, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding the phenomenon of exclusive deali...
This article examines whether retailer bargaining power and upfront slotting allowances prevent smal...
We consider two symmetric upstream firms producing independent goods that sell to consumers through ...
Some commentators believe that slotting allowances enhance social welfare by providing retailers wit...
The Journal of Business © 1983 The University of Chicago PressThis model of distribution provides a ...
Although upfront payments are often observed in contracts between manufacturers and retailers, littl...
This paper examines the effects of exclusive dealing contracts offered by an incumbent distributor. ...
Slotting allowances are fees paid by manufacturers to get access to retailers’ shelf space. Although...
We consider the optimal two-part tariff contract between a manufacturer and a retailer. We show that...
This paper investigates what are the equilibrium distribution systems in a successive duopoly when r...
In this paper we develop a simple model to analyze the effects of exclusive contracts in vertically ...
This article shows how vertical restraints, which affect intrabrand competition, can and will be use...
Slotting fees are fixed charges paid by food manufacturers to retailers for access to the retail mar...
We consider two manufacturers producing two symmetric and independent goods. They sell them through ...
Recent contributions to the issue of countervailing power have formally demonstrated that imperfectl...
In this paper, we provide a conceptual framework for understanding the phenomenon of exclusive deali...