International audience: The global evidence base for health care is extensive, and expanding; with nearly 2 million articles published annually. One estimate suggests 75 trials and 11 systematic reviews are published daily
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) are increasingly viewed as useful decision-making tools yet the...
Background: Selective reporting bias (SRB), the incomplete publication of outcomes ...
Rationale and aim Over the past 12 years, thousands of authors working with the Cochrane Collaborati...
International audience: The global evidence base for health care is extensive, and expanding; with n...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
Despite increasing concerns about the validity of published research, the issue of how the scientifi...
OBJECTIVE To estimate the proportion of healthcare interventions tested within Cochrane Reviews t...
Cochrane systematic reviews have proven to be beneficial for decision making processes, both on a pr...
Objective To examine how poor reporting and inadequate methods for key methodological features in ra...
MR was supported by a Health Research Board (Ireland)—Trials Methodology Research Network Summer Stu...
OBJECTIVES To appraise the quality of evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) within the Cochrane Da...
OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to determine the change in quality of evidence in updates...
This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has played a pivotal role in ...
OBJECTIVES To assess the changes in the risk of bias (RoB) across different versions of the same ...
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) are increasingly viewed as useful decision-making tools yet the...
Background: Selective reporting bias (SRB), the incomplete publication of outcomes ...
Rationale and aim Over the past 12 years, thousands of authors working with the Cochrane Collaborati...
International audience: The global evidence base for health care is extensive, and expanding; with n...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
Abstract Background Clinical decisions are made based on Cochrane reviews, but the implementation of...
Despite increasing concerns about the validity of published research, the issue of how the scientifi...
OBJECTIVE To estimate the proportion of healthcare interventions tested within Cochrane Reviews t...
Cochrane systematic reviews have proven to be beneficial for decision making processes, both on a pr...
Objective To examine how poor reporting and inadequate methods for key methodological features in ra...
MR was supported by a Health Research Board (Ireland)—Trials Methodology Research Network Summer Stu...
OBJECTIVES To appraise the quality of evidence in systematic reviews (SRs) within the Cochrane Da...
OBJECTIVES The objective of the study was to determine the change in quality of evidence in updates...
This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has played a pivotal role in ...
OBJECTIVES To assess the changes in the risk of bias (RoB) across different versions of the same ...
Background: Systematic reviews (SRs) are increasingly viewed as useful decision-making tools yet the...
Background: Selective reporting bias (SRB), the incomplete publication of outcomes ...
Rationale and aim Over the past 12 years, thousands of authors working with the Cochrane Collaborati...