Florida International UniversityFIU Digital CommonsCuba Poll Cuban Research Institute7-21-19971997 FIU Cuba PollGuillermo J. GrenierFlorida International UniversityHugh GladwinFlorida International UniversityFollow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cuba_pollPart of the Latin American Languages and Societies CommonsThis work is brought to you for free and open access by the Cuban Research Institute at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion inCuba Poll by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact dcc@fiu.edu.Recommended CitationGrenier, Guillermo J. and Gladwin, Hugh, "1997 FIU Cuba Poll" (1997). Cuba Poll. Book 9.http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cuba_poll/9425'2-p 4) iv C VaFloeIntumabonalUnrwarty1997 FItInstitutefor PublicOpinion Researcfl( uba Poll( lack here Ii)] repoil >tImmarl/1n12 5tiflC\ results-- "--- ~( lick here for CO!HpWISOfl \\ ~li xist warsresults on iN CC isSLiCs(lick here fbi comm risen of opinions of two ii s 1w xvi en t hex lefi Cub aC lick I ~erc IOU notes Ofl fCadiIll2 tablesIll of Contents'A hen \\ ill iii apr petit teal change occur in Cuba'~AlIoxv COflflMinlCS to sell medicine7. AIIox' LIS companies to sell food4SSu P1)011 U S. military action to overthrowSir ppoui exile IflilitaTY action to overthrow0. Supp.oil human riuht s groups inside CubaEstablish national dialo2ueS Prohibit U S. companies from doint~ business with Cuba9 0', cmli how eli has embari2o worked?tUn I It ii t~NHJI4III ~ciiaI iii;~u I i ci Lii ti u1ij~;iiiics i~i1~L~ I)IisiIiCss in ( >ikt\IIo\x tk~ 'IIC JO! NCi/C(1J)rO )CT1\IL ~\\ iiiiicli I18\ C \ OIL hC;I1(1 about _I Id VIIN-l3IiTioflI ICII11N-IhI[tflfl 12(ih)(i or bad a~ _ \\ ax to brinu chanue in _________-________ Cuba?I 6 1 'resident or the L S Coru2rcss decide xv hen enibaim ) CT1(IsI 7 \\ Fitch inor c iii !P1EI mit lice elect ions or free market e~onomv18 After I:Idei hox\ iiix oh ed should US, be in Cuba?ji) A lieu liii should flC'lpltsident of Cuba be exile or person I ,vint~ In Cuba?2 ( 'AIi:a eflbct vi snot' Po ~e to Cuba2 I \\'Iiat C liect (~i I iS CCOHOIflV ol eInbar2O end and more trade22 Alloxx__travel to Visit rel&itivcsI trflxrhl ust*''' ti(t~ .I I . ~' \I>U24 I titter to uct news in Spanish or in Lnizlish_ Where do you ~et most of your news about CubaN) ____________ - . !n2 j or bad iPr CNN to have bureau in CubaGood or bad Wv Nliami I lerald to have bureau in Cuba'~' 8 II 0 uN ~oiiant position 011 Cuba fOf your vote ill elections29 Al I jpnt of \ 1C\\ arc beinu heard in Miami now3() I loxx fttel about ban on music from Cuba o radio; I . F Io\\ feel about dcci 1011 re M~ mY x~tz4aK >~..(4 ( iilttiiv P(ittilL \ h41> Iv' iI\C Iii S >hk'uId 1I)C~C~C Of viCCICdsC9t >4I csc I >IIC\ ICIiCCEN Li)flhiliIIffl!\ ~ much3) \hotiij ict urn to ( nba if ciciliocratit UO\ eminent/A,>N \\ouilduo ICiuiflflJ _C 111)8 ii boiIi~if IIC\er2n\ C THoCII ii(ba 'g uid__m)Qeseople CamC to U S?Lv~ e abut decision to dport N icaratmansSo Arc i~le 8 1 eSitizeif2f I Are louct seiered to vote?2Iolit icaI jpart\> ' Presidential \ Ok'56IPORImmin ration weclfarc chanues necessaryiINi)l homne ld2CIFlOrida International University home Dai2eRevised JuLy 2 1, 1 997 by Hugh GladwinK ~tShJI)pc(t to r t. ~ i sI"I '997 Cit BA IPOLL(.5 itn er(~i &id\vInIIXECI lIVE SI 4XI NIARYlie j 99InftcirnatiCOmml~unI une 4 Iorial UiverCfsity d(it\ in IDadc ('ountix(.) (j) 7cted by the Ithe Miaminstitute of Public opinion Research (IPOR) of FloridaI eraid, measured the level of support within the Cuban-Americanfir policies directed toward CubaCOnlsistCd of I 20() randomn interviewsT his poll, conducted between May 30 andwith Cuban Americans in the Dade County areasue of the poll permits a complete analysis of various demographic categories within the Cubancomnmunitx Dade CountyTheThe tirst (Cuba lPolI()( (ber of 991was conductedin June ofsix years ago,993 and March ofin March of995~1991 SubsequentAsi n the three previous pollpolls were conducted inS. the researchersfound a diversity of opinions on what policies would facilitate political changes on the island.COnsistency of sonmc of the responses, as well as the shift in others, present us with the most completepI)cturc to date of the Cuban-American political attitudes towards Cuba. While most of the responseswetre consistent with the previous surveys, the most recent poll uncovered interesting shifts in somesigniicant attitudes toward foreign policy options as well as highlighted some important opinionsIregarding the helms-Burton Act and of the importance of foreign policy for domestic decision makinggeneral terms, the findingsIncan be summarized as followsT here appears to be an mncreasmng frustration about the lack of political change occurring on the islandand the growing realization that desired changes are not likely to occur anytime soon. Only 1 1% ofrespondent feel that chanizes will occur within one yearAt the same time, over fifixy one percent (5 6%) of respondents signal that they would supprdialogue with the Cuban government, In the context of the other responses, this desire can be interpretedas signifyin g that among some within the Cuban-American community in Dade County, a dialogue is seenas an agzent of positive change as well as a way to bring about the end of the Castro era in CubaCuban Americans feelsupport its major initithat they are weitives Onlythink that it is a good way to bring15%I informed about the Helms-Burton Act and overwhelminglyrespond that they have not heard much about the law. Over 75%about change on the island1The Cuban American residents of IDade County are generally concerned about the lack of change on theiand but they are (ar from monolithic in their support for different policies. There are major differencesof opinion and a number of these v arv systematically across different groups in the community Forexample, respondents who left Cuba after 1979 are more likely to support negotiated solutionsa rri vin gthan thoseduring the 1960s In fact, the more recent the departure from Cuba, the more likely that therespondent will support negotiated solutionsAlthough only ns0~-~ 4) feel that the embargo has worked well the Cuban American nonulation exuressed) r at IItuIAhs,> x\ >*sI inn L 14 ~I K ~nt rlvkat ~ 11 "SQ v ) d H (A ~ntur Hat n ~ I CC ~f~tfliQ c n t~~r iii ofj)t lilt N\III~l4tiii nun!I [IttB it> NIt ilit ~~t l~ *~i 2 I~i1I1flt P Hk ) tl t J{C~ ~fl~)a1nusSXi [IRs(.1( HHL buYCOIUfl3HICSseizedon the(A H 2 I'I I ~t 'iti~ t1C'~ in ( nba AU kI the & I CritsP~ opulixo \ouid t1 t IT iLl flIp Jill CS to sell medicmne to the people on the IS Ian (AIt ~II*It~1811 Elthis 1125111! NIf th II V it I ~i t\\OI kime4 5111k CX S.Inside (iiiIlichi OX( ublanl- Amineric ane'r4)10C 0 lfl [1) lIt) It VSof respondentsIs w\illisupportU2 10Iendinilend s1I1ppa hand to(dl 10uch0 ( ~I hits reCSf)OndCnts fe el that the number of visas cu rrentlx bein g given to C'ubans on the iand(t. OIUC to the ni ted States t) Iive is adequate0 (11 'the resrclatinupondent S COnlsider themlselves active members of an organization wxorking directly ontO (>iha[ her I C. Of! Iflues to be support fOrf inhtiatinu military action by exile groups 7 l1%) or a U S invasion ofi siand\While the COmmuni1flty supports travel to the island to visit relatives 70%), it does not approve of allowingtria'CI just for the sake of' visiting the island. Approximately 77% think that such trave should not bedIlOW Cdarge mnajority of respondents (70% ) report that a local candidate's position on Cuba is importantetcrrliiriingar ge majority 7 0 feels that all points of view on how to deal with Castro are not bein heard in\iiaiiFINI)INGSANTICIPATION OF POLITICAL CHANGES IN CUBAsurvey results indicate that Cuban-Americans have become less certain about when major po liica!changes will occur in Cubarespondents expected chanWhile in 99 1 and 1995 approximatelyto occur within five years or less8 8% and 41%, respectively, of',only 36% of the current respondentstexpc~t maljOrFOr I ~changzespercentwvithinexpect majorthe next five yearspolitical changes to occur in Cuba within one year while an additional 25percent anticipate that major changes are more than one year but less than five years away.Sof the sample believes that desired changes will never occur in CubaThie older respondents arc more likely%et. younger respondents are more opto consider political changes in Cuba imminent (within one)timistic that change will occur within the next nine years. Syear)imilarly.sIgnitiCanltIy more respondents who oppose a dialogue believe that changes will occur within one year butmore of those favoring a dialogue believe that changes will occur within two to five years1. I > (*0*~?oKp~ ()\urIi d'ill(.~ IPPI1 (74~ 1)[C' \ I fl~ ~t IC Ix 4> 1a\ or the72~() Ilthie (660 o)Ad their \otCAlinT he70~A Kt*rvjIl ( IFS SLPP()RTEDIN ( Irj.() PROMO0TEBAI ( ~$i~~l!~\ Filet KitH\A itlirrit al ~iI ('SjJ~;~t flit I'I C ~lieIt 11$~ (* j (7 t I Ical2Ci1(.1IIY sppoftspatterns there arciludli((d ini this r epo rtat) ai II1(IC nt S1)ase 5(( n(1 their bthe reCsjondcnts( ii ha, edatfilia t ionC I ~ ii U 1112ticatitn dPlease iLi\d iant\ ti p~ornc \ dltAlk ideI I I C t ii '1 CI (. Sf)0115C5Iet. Ici er to IF1CM,10 CCICh 21(11I[)2\ el of suppor I Iorthat X ()iCCd dli OpiniOfl.I ICR>aSSOCIin- t.1p)(osItIkon (Mn 3tabulations forweC wIspecific policiestheIi hiIfghli glhtICIC\ to pro fl 'I K) t Cat ed aih particularLieijalSQ\ en()121ICXCI H able sVtucal ciUt oups1~i IiL'CsTizendcrxwith the (Cubancomplete details on tthe general responseswe look at the rank order ofhe crossage,' Yearisla ridLOX (Aninent ande ditibrences bct\\ censupport from the all ofthe populationsti hewing order emerges2 pCI CCIII td\ OF SI) jyort I fl hu man rig hIs U roups wor kin g inside CubaJ)CI CCIII LIX 01 tiutl lUll V actiOnll K the exile COmmflufltv agamnst the Cuban government7() peC cciii faxor dlIOwilIU flak ci tO the island tO visit relativesPCI cent Lav\ (i nlted1 States military act ion to overthrow Cuban governmentper Cent lax or al lowing Co mpaniies to sell medicine toUl per ceni favor theI~Q f [CSCthe islandestablishment of a national dialogue between Cuban exiles, Cuban dissidents, aridrntativyes of the Cuban Government44 percent faker allowin gUS companes to sell food to the island.n3 - prcIn Cf I lakol alloxvnn u travel to the island ust to visit.CHANGES IN PERSONAL PLANS IF CUBA'SCGOVERNMENT CHANGES TO A DESIRED DEMOCRACYAnot her set of questions were designed to measure the potential movement of Cubans between Miamiand the island when certain changes are percei\ved to have taken place in Cuban23 percent would be very likely 0 or somewhat likely (1 6 %o)to return to live on the stand if theC () t Ii I t I ~\ S eConOmy improved significantly29 percent would be very likely 14 30) or somewhat likely 5%) to return to live on the island if thecountry 's overnmlent changed to a democratic form49 percent would be very Like\ (2X%'~ or somewhat ikely 6 6%)changed tor the better.n the island would come to the United States to live if Cuba had aisland if thecconomyv and the35 0 percent Ie ItgO\Crfllflefltthat relativ es oidIemrocratlc ~zovernment( 'lANCEIPNILITICALNbpoofON T111E ISSU E OF A DIA LOGU EI , CIhdp\ I K nv\k tit:fl t 1Y~I~ the'it \ d.1p~cusscd (1 I\ isbn wk ithn the ( ubarpAmnic ian commiumt\ in the1 h support a diahoue annonu all ( ubans and the CubanrH I edStat is t hatUflVCffltllerlt tO L\[~CclItC chaiiucs(juiSlhtP 1 (lid not krm\\ it theN w'OUid SlpporThh such and initiat SI (/) Sof the respondents tax or theSOU RCE OF INFORMATION USED BY RESPONDENTSAni~thr Sit of questions mecasured the primarY sourCC of information used by the respondents to receivenewS about ( 1ba)fl pci ceni recci ve in Ikr mat ion about Cuba rnm sonmc television sourceP0 Cpeen depend OJn newspapers for their primary source of information about Cuba,2 Ipcrcent listen to the radio for informat ion about Cuba.)t hers received most of their information hrnm friends (5%).Other Media Questionspci pcent of the respondents prefer to receive their news in Spanish and 22 percent prefer news inI 'wjish and 25 percent preibr both$7> perecent believe that it is a igood idea icr CNN to open a bureau in Havana>6 percent believe that it is a iood idea for the Herald to open a news bureau in HavanaLDomestic Spill Over EffectOne section of the questionnaire is desrizned to measure some of the impact that the Cuba issue mighthave on domestic electoral concerns One of the most significant results of the domestic spill over effectof the Cuban-American comnmnities' concern with Cunba is their high registration in the Republican IPartyAbout 68 percent of the respondents are U S citizens Of these. 92 percent report being registered toxOtc And of these. 70 percent are registered in the Republican Party, 16 percent are registeredDemocrats and 14 percent are Independents Analysts have signaled this political alignment, not typical ofthe I ispanic population in the United States, to be a result of the Cuban concern for foreign policy issuesCubans became involved in politics initially to influence Washington's position towards Cuba Achievinglocal p)(ower is a result of this initial commitmentThe polls discern some other dimensions of the spill-over effect on Cuban-American political cultureSeventy percent say that in local politicai elections, a candidate's position on Cuba is important indetermining their v ote14.>8(nd anid the w \ kho poe such a dialocuc ExCIUdInZ die respondents \who dIdJ rot dansWer the51Lit , <.4I t'* ~ K'~ CX'. 3 a~ \'IIII~ ( INtro arc rB~t hcinu h~xtrvi14)1 t\ V)I)C flCJ Cent Af C Ifl dtHCC1flelit \k dli the JCCISIQP to (\CIUdC And\ Niontane, tiorn the (Kilic ( )choIC~sII\;jI\S4j\eFi ~C1 Cisiai~I I IIIUSIC *11\ mtaijorit( N "L Uen! ILree With tihe decision by SomIV stations to stop broadcastinu ( uban ( ti m the(kill rai 10So InainS)tfeI that their opinion. \ halc\ er it \was. reflects tihe viC\\ of most of the( utban-Am\enricani commnts in lDadc (\untvThle helms-Burton1i1l\ six percent (ii the sampieActhas heard a great deal about the H eims-Burton ILawSC\ventx live percent ci thle samlple feels that the 11-B Law is a good idea to bring around change in CubaS event \ three p(eren feel that the Uembfaruo against ( ubaS; Congress (and not the President), should decide when to end theWhen asked to choose between free elections or a free market system being put in place first, 49 percentof the sample said that free elect ions are more important than a free market economyEi Wv one percent of the sample said that the U( ast ro (Cuba 35 percent said that the U SS should be very involved in the development of a PostsIR)uld be somewhat involvedOTH ER OPINIONSForty I \ o percent of the sample believes that the next president of Cuba after Fidel should be someoneliving on the island nowFifti two percent of the sample believes that the up coming visit by the Pope to the island will not bringabout aim significant changesIFitty five percent feel that the recent changes in immigration and welfare laws which have caused antmiber of legal residents to lose government benetits were not necessaryNIETHODOLOGY (PRELIMINARY NOTES)[rem May 3() to June 14, 1,200 Cuban-Americans in Dade County, Florida were asked a series ofquestions abot their support af policies toxward CubaA random sample wxas izeneratedi from telephone exchanges in Dade County using standardrand om-diit -dialing procedures which ensure that each residential phone has an equal chance of beingchosen tor the sample The sample was stratitied by the 1990 census estimates of number of residents ofCuban descent Bilingual (Spanishmnlish) interviewers conducted the interviews from IPOR'S telephone'illinI . H K t~ KIK! V K.> K1<1)I? I I~ H I hi\~ (liiitIty<,y 12?t I hc \Jl11I>ICI ~ Y\ .tlhI~I lb I S ~CI Ksi it I NI Ici! Ik\ U C fly thI in thuI'~ (Ku. nil ic at it~J[!1c tk~ t1~e I IN!cip 'nuli to rnakctA~ StaIdItc~I11~ifl\t\\vl U!ot the (liflert ii CC I*~ '~.C IPhil UIII CII 1N( IPAL .INV EST[IGATORSI )i ( iullermu J ( ienic; is Associjiat Potessur of SocIokoiz\ and Aiithropolouv and IDircctor ot the(cen flu I abki [(su~tch and Stiidics at Florida Inteinational I fliversit\ Ir Ihigh (Gladwin is DlirectorIt Kh I nsi tute u ir IPubbic (pinu m Research (IPO R) at FIll and Associate lProfbssoi of Sociology andArnthropolou\ t he author s thank the I P( Rs stafl and interviewers for their skill and dedicationNI ~I Ihut v18Ncen(( (ifliparison i~ ith [)ast [)oIIs on three q uestionsAIA4Httkk>.......................................................................................................................................itvla raft8.4. .34 44tItI42A t (IC~11/..VI4Opinions of different waves of immigrants from( uhba.200'10019250O 1935 0 19450O155U 1~zJbt U 1JUID U ThltjO U ItflID U1930 0 1940.0 1950.0 1960.0 1970.0 1980.0 1990.0Year left Cuba)nc of' the mos05 lmp(.rtanlt w3ys the Cuban community in D)ade County differs is by the years when theI aruesit trkups of people came to Dade County The begzinniniz and end of the 1960's decade saw~ largeuiumbers arri ing, with somfe\what fewer in the middle years. Immiigration durinu the 1970's was muchless, fOlO\ed by the Mlaried gro up in 1080 The numbers diminished aizain until after the early 1990'sTo p)Iace these uroups In to categories where there are enouizh responses to analyze, it was necessary touse years xw hen immigration \\as loxx as the cateuory boundary Thus everyone who left Cunba in theyears I 975- 1984 are in one cateuorv. even though most arrived in 19800a5a)L4 N>jAge (distribut ions for each groupIt . l)I 196(1Histogramt ~VaASS30 0 35 0 40.0 46.0 50.0 56.0 00.0 70.0 75.0 $0.0 85.0 900SWd Devu= 13066Wean = 63.9N= 60006.0Agedistribution for people wkhO gave the year when they came from Cuba as being before I %6(I 960-1964H4C..)V.,Kbaaw 04(30 460 500 554) 00.0 65,0 70,0 8v0 0 00.0Std Dev =12 72Wa =59 9N=225 00o5 oHist og ram250 0.0 5.0 40.0 4&0 50.0 55.0 60.0 65.0 70.0708.0ao000 90Hist ogr amAC1a)t~.Aq~965- 974C)Ua)CrLU10 Std 0ev =16 78Meanz=57l1N = 317.00Histogram40LI)L~.Sid 0ev 16 7(~~an=4S6N=IQSOO2C.O itO 300Aq~984HistogramL .200*2kb 4 ~>I I)CLia>flCTa.Li,20 4 30 4Aie40i1 46.0 66.0 00.0(eI I j K4N) nct C 11CCI KK I ~ I A1IA \ >~ V* t~ (1K Ut)<*t ~li C Iit ~1i jilt:tc r t Ktab> I>ctxxI hi LU U> Itccli N: bruc IC N! 'lit'AAN lIPt Ii K I I > V K)0 I/ILI 7 7 ihiIN'fl/I 4)/It \ II 1 I ~I his ~1JCS!H41I bust [C[ ICSCI1IS 1>J)0IISC\~ult .Q) t'I It iPt 9.'. 1W An #4 Pfl# 'ii10 (10 \\ II1~ fllC~Sfl! ~s to durix I he ( nbaI t AZ it UII;iCv 41 S I flU '4 ~OUI Cc ol solutions to pi obicins in ( nba if the UO\ cinnient can hux tv4Od itIth It Ul p 4hIcIflt 11 its 0\\ B tel !II\*S~ 1 j1 7" 1/mni mt/ti ii h In #pi l'i the t'.W/t ut ~miflunin to o~ crthnni 11w ( uNu, ( it )1CPj1IflCIt.. I ~' h~flhi#S//i ftivmn ul A/It Uhf IV i/)f)H\C 1//IA Ihis question covers the dirllcnsik)n ot seeii*~uC\ICIIbtI 1w tv i~ cItilIUc tinnus in (mba*I 2. /)&'IhhIIZl)/1.! fill 17/h' U )I))/kZI)/C.% In III) 0//h') ct )11/II1IL'A Ii /1)6/) t7UhIU '1 buAmnc'v\ Iii ( Utbz. tltt ~(?IIannili hi' 74 flIt )/'fh)$t) HI AU44h~IV O/)f) tsc>' This question is related to the need to maint.t he pit~cCss I eContin~iic pi essur e on ( ~ubaI ~Ih ~ m~t these Ibet e ave a number of other questions on inure spectic issueXVII IN XVI LI. P01 III( 'Al. (I lANG 1K TAKE PLA( 'E IN Cl BA?Political ( -bhanac in Cuba expected-a- infive years or less.100%80%60%40%20%4-Ct~zjVKV.1K>VV<- >«[J7rjjt~.*>/I~t<1~KCKt~I'..rV*K~ p$122<>~1< -24 K)K20%FVKrI'IKItIr Y4..NittAP~ tVL I4AtLalicnotbefore 1iqoc 1 9L~C-1~C4 1905-1974 1 975- 1984 after 1984 born in USVga. ~ r t'~m~ tn I I.c' frnrm C~, ~0eVoters:. Clinton 'S. Dole.1 00%~8O'X60%40%20%0%g-nLICIDcnote th9 voters1984 grec onc lusdrawn fgroup.before 1960 1gon-1954Year106&-1974 1975-1984came toafter 1984US fromborn in USCuba<7:4%f 997 ii ( 'uha IPoII: Notes on reading talsIntemnation.IUnmvvrstyInstitul,for Pub~licOpinion Researcfleach questioii in tle poll the Nlo\ int lilformlatioii is 121\en(jtICstin Setund. Ii C(!ICIIC tal)IFirstI here arce t imi portant percent agethe IC tet ot thecolumnns an theii LJtlClIt~\ Iilu~t iIfls\\ Ci.1le 1I( lte c lmn it led "P er cent is the percentage out ol a! I respondents forIn t hi> W tlmm peopIC\le wh ref used to answer (r said( they did not know thedi s\\er are irnci tded im the total tOr wich this pecenltage is calculated The columnIPeiceinlt4 is a petrceitaizc based on the respondents who had an opinion about the qutestOnhat td al '2xci 1I(eS t he people who had ho opinion or did not answer the qulestion.I ()iOwVInII he Ircqiieney tables is the third part for each question, the cuosstabs tablesIThese arc done wvith txwo opinion quest ions and a number of demographics.Ixel urnto able ontntsRevised July I 7 997 by H1ugh GladwinIRKI*rINtt.4:'AFiondaIntemnatonaIUnranstyfor PublicOpinion Rsoa.reinI~)17 Ill ( iiln PollbIik licic1 hi je sunarI/n2 sllr\ ic'slatle.k licic fo Conflpnson \\i h pti \~n Cdsrestil tsn t lwcc 55se,( ark here fhr COmr flal IoiHjiions 012OtIQuS lICIhe thCeft ubvlikhere Hr note> on reaInl tablestable of Contentsfl \\~1icri \\Il I inn br nnlil ion! clv~T1ot~ nooiir in ( >iI~n)A IlO\\ coilipanes to se ll medicinXI ox (S Cinp:HHn esto sell bed4Suppolrt I. S militarg action to ( ertbrowSSupport exile mil!itar\ acti1Onl to ovcrihrow0 Sipjxil lItn T~11l-r2Is uron S sieCuba- Istab! sh) nial'! dialoueS 1Folnbit 1.S Coin Mglie> tromn d01n2 business with Cuba9 (k)vral I hu''. \\CI has embardlt w orked?I + 1R-4tr~\k t~ijItI iciurri to ( iilu at bcttcV cconoin~itId icE urn I C nba it deim ~cnt ICuo\ eminentiuE: )()' H ANT 1()JJAI~tAWflI iftal 2771 6.676.921.6I iN.(23.02.123.11200 I(I(L0TablesWhen will major political change occur7. Establish nationaldialogue.9. Overall how wellhas embargoworked?op j)OSC favor not well well 18-29 30-44 45-6465 andolderI T11 IX (ONELN JTWY) TU)F/li E ERS1. H hen 'viiimnajor pa/ificatchtalnge' icur.IX SI X TU)iI EIE4RS?(N Li? it>11K-I RN?OR NFL ER?Is lII/I\I ~I I.i. l3.x24)1299171132~4li.X34.21(1.71 2846.21N4Ii."If Id II I1041/Age36%/a34%11%33%012%32%18%33%2%31%20%I6 /07%/33%21% 390/c32%/37%/33%35%/11%/c22%22%35%190c9%12% 014%22%37%/ 10%'5%9%22%29%i'nhIp~25hen X% ill IILIJI)r Why 1(241 Clii 112C DCCII F(,rndrr ofrr'p"ndenthigh ~chuoIgraduatc39. In i*hat scar did ~ou Icaic ( U1.N'ItflMAIllENtil I thMn'IsIi r1959or 1961k 196') 19741-1979 1 98IV~ J 4)fl(J 19()4I-J 9'1marc hcforcIf II//J\fl'\t)tt1??IN IlUlif) ,t/J II If lien ) I* Inut/arjuulttn ulthunge'Itflttgr,/ ~IV /1KVVidl JRIF\lit IIS"Vi?V/ti 161??lables~~heii II ill major politica change occur~*~>I'Sj 30'4%it i/i'-'0-- 028%J ~0 0J4)0~34%23"j~?0.~g15%35%IX 0''02(1%3I 023 0 I 6"~ 1II~,0 21%J4 0'013%28''3% '5%I 104- 0I 6 '~15%25%'5%1410024%I5'>'.,21%11~~23%18%16%8%2I 0//0I 9 ~~00Loft54 Art a t A.citIren~Cfl liennutcitucn~'N hi~cBlack orMulattounderS 241 ) H H ~2WS4iAHwIorrSSO,(NIu~'i\j IL iN?It' lie () 'U/ ii A 11> iRAA ii ii cii iiiIIItItIj~)t'banj'ulititjg IIMc 'p''((sir.IA NI \ H)I /6)J6I US?) I LI? I 1KWIL(1? NFl FR?Return to table of contentsPOR 10fl1C pa2eFlorida International Urn \ersIt\ home pai eRevised Jul 9 I 1997 1w Hugh GladwinI ~irace3 0 lb a 24%34%IS.330ha21%32%4 02 ~6 ~120o 19%31o~22%38%I220'3%I 9 W0'9%15%28%14%22%28%12%26%13%23%16% I5230o 130/oIPORI IAPORI C I C I I Il k ~1K>AII ic1 ijin 1 I I c)ntemnabonulInstitutefor PublicI Frequencies2. Allow comipanics to sell medicine?Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentS'JRUVU. V ElI 01?11)511. V F-I 101?4105/I. V OPPOSEN1~ROXGL 1 t)I'IN)SFI Pith379116431.697.032.6100.0I)tA\'I K.\Y)W .\'Q HEN Pt ).VEIf.I ,XIfl~'361200F reuuencies4tick2.F444A444"'ill337 28.131029.025.813829.4126.6''.555.611.9 67.4i2 rtzlIota!36I (101)3.03.0I (IILOIIICI OIC(ImeICIfFretiucnc~5j7Perccnl ~aIaI Percent43.'( umulnti r Perent44.4 44.4'i/~4 I/ isIu/nhi~~ tug53),I1b64 97.1)55') 141(1.4)I 4111.413.,361211(17. Establish nationalU I fluI. U3.')14)41.1)la 1)14 5sto scil medicine9. Oicrall how iielihas emlbargoworked?favor nOt well well 18-29 30-44 45-6465 andolder2. I Ihnt t4ktPlf)tiIICA ()/1JWA 1'ii~ sell tnt'Jitine955%0T ablesAllow COmIpan~Ies to sell medCiine~2.CII~ "'A'I v't*iII afalAge59% 30%4I%45%/7fl0/47% 25%/ 1/053%/ 75%5fl%42%/I.JIPORFlondaIfltfltIttOflhIL)nivvnstyIristitulelicklKcttir iiA f ItI ;ti t dPH t Ilic>Optneon Researcn1) I ~ I c. I 11K2. Allow companies to sell medicine2 1 I ci I)aSadth ei 12t)bir( di lOs I stadoslahJ\ adl diferetites miedidIas hacia CubaUnJidios XIYo Ic'a comnunidad cubana en elivoy aleer a U. d aigufnas de las c~tCxiliO. haniIC sC aPr 1) ucsto \ Iuilsiera queI Ud4 me dilera si las f'avorcc 0 sC OpOneC a eilas. Permnitir acfmpIxunas iioricaicanals E: Ilt kr(CeC, SC t)Jhne 0 SC ()p0e fuKA I h Comupam is to sell iiedi)ppOSC or stfoly1 OppOSe this?9UU!. ) vender medicinas a Cuba. U d tavovcc fhertemcntc.icriimcnte a esto"cinc to Cuba, do youi strongly fAvor, mostly favor, mostlyF requencies2. Allow companies to sell medicine 9F~requenci Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentSIRt)XGI. 11K-Il 01?.* h)SlT/. 1 /<1 01?Y)AU AS iL 1 OPPOSESiT l)\GI. V OPPO)SE 379 31.6 32.6 10(1.111164I )lA\'I K.\Vl1W Vt) REKSVI)ASE 3636120(197.03.03.0I 4I(.4FrequenciesK.1I t i/id337 28.131029.0I.....I....25.811.5138I atal26.629.1111.9tiXAiIfl,'55.667.4/ ta/Total\Iloxw (Ompan3IiCS 1( sell Imed(ICII1req Ucflr% Percent \ialid Pcrcnt ( umulatis Percent1,1~~~' ~It 'tlmflfng550.644>4I II4).I)ti'miigI oi~tiAlloii comipanie7. Establish nationaldialogue?sto sell medicine9. O'erall how wieIIhas emlbargoworked?not well wieII 18-29 34)44 454)465 andolder(tI7pt) Civ xcii inedwuve!/ ti var* TablcsAllow companies to sel medicine95I7 43.164~44.41 16436I tinjl3 .03J 3.)1011.41I14)IIfaorAge590< 311% 45% 47%/741%25%55%4J%053%47%75% 590/ 53%0 42%1~(.rndrr ofrr. 5 ~ fl d c n I traduairlt~ ItsJQ In nhat icar did '~'U k.ar (uha~I 959NI Al.! Ft MALI than or Of I 96(k) 90~ I 90~ I 9~~') I 9K1[. I ')N9mort I ~ itIl/onK U ti ii liiIi' sr/I, .,I 'I 'I'" "t 0 SI0 49 ~ 4k 5X%I a 1corn pa nies to sell medicine50. Arc xou a U.S.citucn? race incomecit iic nriOtcitucn~4hitcBlack orMulattounderS2OJIIHISZO-50A)O4) *ncr$5 () .4)414)llhji,citfltpdflIti.%71)i.';lit 'it'llReturn to table of content>IPORI IX )R houm flueFlorida I niernat iorial Vii B CVSitv home Jfl2CRe \ISCd July 2!~ I9~) by 11U21) (;iad\VII)4-'Is44 *4 4 ~ 5100 420.0 34) P SI"(t I 440044%4902 ~So OPdesflh'IWW 4~7% 390,4,/x var46%53% GI /0~~0<33/054%51%67%43%49%4I 0 0570 590Inh#tfl*ttOnhI( Iak, I ~ t ~ It I it Ic> Lfritvwr'attyP chu i ii a b l a c3. Allowlnttut@for PublicOpinion ResearchtU.S companies to sell foodI ciii it COllI IlS 1olt)icilcrleaflas (I EE 1' I~ ) vender aijimentos a CtiaSt OJ)OflCXII (fl\ it~g t Siiiostl> 0I)poSC,d Invorece0 sC opone luertemnente d estoCompamecs to sell fhod to (Cuiba. Do you stron2Iy favor, mostly favor,or strongiy oppose this?Frequencies3 . Allow 1 .S companies to sell food?Frequcnc~ Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentSTiROhGI. } 1Q11 1?M(AW L F"F410?R110511 TV O'PPOISESJRONGI V OI~POSE10111149711571) ' K N()H i ORESI'0\SEJ/ ~flu1434341.496.443.1)100 .43.63.61200FrequenciesfRiAt$PORHondaKVI tutu244 2(1.322321.118.616.119319.321.116.740.457.11J~ 'red1011.0i d\Ilov* S (Ofl)~)tt1)It'X 1%) %eII r(ilOIIF rrqurnn Pr rrcnl \*11(d Perrnt5 -( umulatn e Prrreni59kA, vur/ ta~i14W' 314,9I I5~41L4 I (141,11I (141,41434312(141~Ll Ion .'7. Establish nationdialogue?363 A~I 4141.0'I 'iblescompanies to sell foodal 9. Overall how well.ti has embargoworked?oppow favor not wcll well 18-29 30-44 45-6465 andolder3. lII~~ 1 .5(*t)?7iIptt1tIt~A to it'llt)JlpOAt'fri icr'I a hiesAlloiw I' .S companies to sdl food3~I ~1IJ4~Its u'rgnniu:gI cliiiI tutuAge'77%0 44%23% 56%62%/ 51% 63%/630/a 49%79%37%/ 21%/(,rndrr nf~ P' n tic ti Ihagh ithod~raduatcIfs39, In what %cnr dsd ~.ou kair ( uha ~I 95')MAt I F1%141 thanIts4 Jo,ormnn'or I 964k! 9690I')XW P3W? I'$NI 199before55% 55% Ix , 043%In idesAlloxi I.5 CDIII jflt flies I () sell food50.Arc ioual.S.t iti.j'cn race Incomecitiiennotciti, cnWhiteBlack t~rNiulattounderS20A)00 S20-5IJ,4)0()(ncrSSO,0O()A 1I/~n~ I i~ttktPIJ)tiIlItftA ItI tAt/I, ~ ~'I:>tIjIpu)XCfainrRet urn to table of contentsIPOR[P( )R llv)lnC f)il2C1:1Orij.~ International 11 fll\ ersit\ home rnueRi C vised JtII\ 21 j997 bx I iu2h (iladxv inAtIIIb~/A/.' xe/Ifavor ISO 3 ~0 330 45%--a Jibe 45% (1O~ 064%36%52%4X%62%38%43%57%64%36%60%40%550/45%.4I ~cic I :I kiHandsIntnnatonaiUn~nrtstyIflttttut,Opmnion Researtl1curlicrilU.S. military action to overthrowApovar iina mtcr\cion mH ihtni dcl 2Obiefrn) nlOrtcZmerCfanlO (E (UU para derrmcav at12h( er)1 CI cubao, d tav orcc Ifue rleentc, 1lavorec., SC 0~0flC 0 SC opone tfucritmente uNitpporlamg direct S m itary action to overthrow the Cuban g~overniment .Noustrouiplv ta\or, mllstl\ Ifa v or I1mOStly 0tpp)05(2, or strongly oppose this?Frequencies4. Support 1 . S. military action to overthrow?Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentSi ROVGJ. 1 Fl I 01?MOSFI. VP] ID!?I u/ut $105 TI V OiPPiSESi IRtA\GL 1 t)PIN)SEI Ott/i23411I54Ifl)A"i KNOll AY) RESPoNSE 4619.596.220.3 100.0100.113.Ml!isxmt~:461200I requenciesV. I ~. r ~I v~ci4PN4. SupportI596 49.716051.613.316413.913.751.665.514.2it),"'79.7I taltI3.8I 00.0I II iii *~ I4' 44. Support k*. . . . .I-.1%. iiitar' aICtII(I to mIe rinroii.rrtjuenQ Pe rcent Vslid Percent (umulautne Percentt rI ,jli~dI '4thP7IL% tiiigingI ' dalI 041.41IPXI t)hh1 I 20t1 I II.LI ~II'Support I 'S.7. Establish nationaldialogue?"military action to overthrow9. Overall how wveilhas embargoworked?favor not nell well 18-29 34)44 45-6465 andolder4. Auppjrt 330/33%mihfart' tittlt'tIP vertliron? favt'rTablesSI'pport I .5. military action to overthrowI;33263.4)398'56115434.5"5.534.5I I H I (I46I A.(0Age26%'74%34% 35%/ 4Q0% 34%/65~/o460% 66%/ 67% 67%44II(rrndrr nirrspundnwhigh .choog.graduatelen Ifs39. In what lear did iou kansc (uba'I9~9MALI FFIAI 'F than Ur I or I ')64k I 969 I 9 ~ 0 I 99 9PUk 19149morr before2X*.490C1 ~thIesSupport .. iii ii itarv action to o'erthrovi50. A re IOU a U.S.titlien' race Incomecitizennotcitizen b'iteBlack orMulattounderS20ji0() $211-5o,O(0 )overS50,000I A.,nihiarj action to{Ctuii~ tO a~b Ie (7)f contentsPOR home P ~2CLid IfltCUfldtlOflal Lni \ elt\ home naucevise d JUI\ 21 1997 by Huszh Giadwin/'ni/i/ar1'Is~0% 39'It hull It'32*. 25%( ICo "Moo341",'so-, 0300. 29* SI*/(1 9row.33%(a icr38% 33%670/0 62%4 1067%32%/ 36%68%/c35%65%IPOR01RI ti{[;H~ tk~ Itp r I*NrC~I&( rThKtA'\ tflu[I Jere for ;udcs ofl rcada~~gj4PIcstable% for PubicOpinion Research:__ Con! Cii!>Support exile military action to overthrowApoyar ac<.LdCIOflCSI a vorecmilitares de Ia comunidad cubana en:c fbcrternente, favorece, se opone oelseexilio para derrocar al gobiernoopone fuertemente a esto?)Supporting military action by the exile community to overthrow the Cuban(hw'cn~mneiuthi1)o you strongly favor, mostly favor, mostS!y oppose, or strongly opposeFreq uenciesupport exile military ac tion to overthrow?Frequency Percent SValid Percent Cumulative PercentST RO)NGL 1' FA VOR.41)51TL1' FA (ORI ti/i 4 MO)STL 1' (PP(OSES TROXNGL 1' OPPO)SEiir)ft.lI1741164I)NA'N NU) No) RESPONSEA3614.597.014.9100.03.()iota! 3612003.11100.0FrequenciesagilCK~ I rn.q5.5L 1II')dfl(5. S646 53.818455.515.316015.855.513.3 13.771.385.1la/al100A)ht'pijiurt ( tile ,,iilitjrx action to o~ er1hrtn~ft quenc' I erctnt \iad Pcrvrns ( umulntiI ' rI ~>t~iI"'A'itt'''"A,I iiiIe~1)p)port exile mn ilitarx action to overthrow,. Establish n ationaldialogue?9. Overall hos sellhas embargonorked?rai or not sell well 18-29 30-14 45-6465 andolderi Su'prt t.xilt'mi/dan aclitti:~ urn/i rant)Jpt) CU,/avarTablesSu PIort exile inilitarn act ion to overthrowC4din, I IVt'(334X 34r PtI 1(4-I 3S9 $ ITh -A-Ii)4 I.4~I 4111.1/ taI3.,I 44~tIJ(I 24)113.)Ii II.ESAge36%Y90'029%64%270% 38%7I%34%73%25%62%o25%440/ 79%44 ~4 C.Gender ofripindenthigh tch.o.lgraduate39i. In what 'car did snu keai ( CubrIen.MALI FENIA! F than115or1959or 19741-1979 1980-19W) IQ4 NI~I9A~1)440 fti.~ atIlii/ihjrtitl Ian It'(flrrIhttp)$,)WI, ~f)e IvarTahiesSuppori cx ii50. Are I fU a U.S.citizen?e military action to overthrowracecitizennotcitizenWhiteBlack (rFMiulattounderS20,OO() S20-50,00()overS50,NHI%~IJvtsrI cvile,nililar, uIion It)nvt'rtJi ran!()J)J)ttA ElfavarReturn to tab1~C)R hon~e p aucLIOrida InlternlatiOnlaI Un ersit hOIlICRevised JLyv 21. 1997 by IHugh Gladwin115 mort29". 23".7I U 7tjO23~--V. U 7(I23.71%38.72. 62Iflcome28%72%29%/o7jO/~28%72%37%/63%/o 75%34%7j%/ 66%teIPOR~1 auc'I II t ~%PA« 11 catlan: 1.11 IC UrnwnstyInstituteI k Cliii ' t Itfor Public~A lilcids Optnlon Researti.Establish national dialogueI sluldccci (Ill goIC a&setltis dei Lg)1icrnotit~t IClICltt 8l eSIOlri ac tonal entuc I os cubanos I los cx'di ilvorece luertcmente.,liados,favoreclos disideTtCse,S se po11C 0C ' ubanosSC OPOI~L'hstablilsbii a nlationlal dilIOl!LICC I)IeSeIllI\ US ol lilt' ( tibhan iloveamonL Cuban exiles. Cuban dissidents, andrnmect..Do you stronigly favor, mostly fiavor, mostlyoppoe o strngl oppse hisFrequencies7. Establish national dialogue?Frequenci Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentSlRO\UI. V 1K] I 01?MON ii. V 1 ] (0?.311)51 TV O PPO)SESTRO>NG!.Y VOPPOSEI Ott/I3881123flOAiKXt)Ji At) RESIYJ\SEfl tin I777 /2 20032.393.63-1.6100.06.46.4100.4)F'requenctesI71~1VI ~iIid333 27.820.524629.715621.929.713.051.613.9 65.4/ tottIIlukE)p~ . ES(3IIbl i atiral (IdI(Jt!1C?F rr~jucncs574)1123Pc rccnt Valid Perrrnt45*3 41(44X393 * 651"(umnulaui c Pcrvent1().I (HI.I6.4Ii~ sii~.6.4I ~NIAII t I) I CSstablish naftiOnl (ialo9.O cvrall hon wellhas embargo worked? Age Gender of respondentI ~wbh~hii atu.'n al due lagu C"OJ)f)U~ t~fav*'rnot well48%nell 18-29 30-4444)0/48% 77%045-6456~~44%65 andolder640/o36%MA LE47%/53%FEMALE49%51%Tablesstablish natioiial dialogue, ~ CI tiliti fa varI tJ1411liEn.' it/ tItJI atal1~12(14)gueEhigh .chsdgraduateItsthat'Is420orrnorr0 45%55039, In shat 'car did ~iou ka~c ( uhCAre ILW aLs~ churn'1959or I 974k 19'') 198W. I 9~49 19941 199' cat lientwforr62'.45% -woe59%41%.49%51%SI,,74% 49~ 0no'cit en4J 0(4~001 t1)ICSI . sI~t I) Ii sit national dialoguerace Income~Xhitc Black or Mulatto under S20,0441 S20 -50.000 over SSOJIIHI(stab/nh (qq)t) 'ICtnitu'nulA'tarReturn to ml)IC o COIlICEIT SI P()R hofl~eJ~j~gc1:loi.ij.~ I uterilat I()I13I )flI\ crsitv ~OIflC paucC\lSCd .h II 1 997 by I itwh Gladwm01,/fl, C1 '(at (Phft (ff14 )ttd/~JI4IIi'ddC if fin, rlit!1 !'50% 39%50% 61%520o48%51%490/4J0/590/IPOR'RAJORF lend.( L~ 1>I I *~i K ~1 ! ~ I ~AhIk. Vlnternnt~onhJUnsvwrs4t~Institutefor PublicJ >t. I Hi It I ii *~ I 'I u qiIcfll< Opdnlon Research1Prohibitwiith (U.S. companies from doing businessubaI rolnbir Ic a CilljMiflhiIS dcIt ICr tCI11CI~IcK Id\ OICC(.1t48 1 17.1,11sL (JOInC 0haCer fegCL COS COU Cuba, Udt1 favorecese OPOneC ILICrAIImentC a estOI'1tobllh111U2 I) S COIUXaIeIs frOm doing busiess with Cuba, [do you strongly apprO\C,iiostl> ;Ippro\v, mo1stl d isapprove, or strongly disapproFrequencies8. IProhihit I) .S. companies front doing husiness?Frequenec Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentSIRUVGI. )AI~PRUI 16U)S 11. )APPROt'Ejtft)XiL V I)ISAPPRUi K5i RU\GI. } IISAPIPR()J E/ oralIflt\'I KAY)JJ AU RtWP()ASFif U. A1nlI i'rtiI14 'flit2951 17228281201)24.69 7.7100.0100.02.32.3I0(0Frequencies8.KSS~i f4i4 /592 49.312450.510.316150.510.613.46 I * I13.7 74.825.2*I~tofu ~ Ie C fronm doing hinteiCSsI rtqucnci Percent X slid Percent ( umulatn e PervrntI ~ ~tk t I6 1,1 1II4I1~I I Il I .11?7II~%I1?4lilA 111/ ulalI taI 12(102,3I 0(IJIa IdesIP)roh thU IL COfll[Ntfl 'es front doing business7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Oicrall how wellhas emIbargoworked?oppose ravor nOt well well 18-29 30-44 S454>465 andolderA. I'r.hihitiapann 'it?,'I X/ rum1)II.%IPIt'A%OJj'Y (~A C4, icrTablesIP)rohtibit I .s. companies from doinunit Ib)it >4.I abS456 3$',"16lattilS.,-I V23$))97,72$ 2.3Age37% 41% 490%590/43%/60"~ 62%/o39%/490%60%57%350/s61% 65%0bg usi ness(,rnder 4,1rr' rn den Ihit t&h~'I~'rAduatrIt ii 'Is39, In ~haf %rmr did ~w ka~t ( ubs'1 95')NI 411 H NI 41 F than or I 9641 J 96 *) I~V'4L I 9~9 198fl 14~X9 I999[ i'rJ90l's~t /tr>hjIi' t/ 7 t ~I"t'uut'favor90"I 0 "ImoreU 0 0a GOMobefort44 00I ahies'rolni)it 4. (TOIIIpIfl IC'S fro ii, doing hiisiiiessSO A rc iou a US.citizen? raceincomenott utiicn( it tenWhiteBlack orMulattounderS204)OO S20-50,(14WoverSSOOOE)~vI ~rt4rbgICf 'Dl,590/) 390~38%th'Ing fa vatRet urn to table of COfltCflt sIPOR______ I P( )R humcpaueIlonda I Hiciflat i@nal 1. P1 \CVSIt\ hoiric paucCVISC d iti K 2 1997' 1w 1 iuuh Gladv. in390 I' 0 0 35.(*1 "~42CI 39 0'0 390/o6I 61%~ GJ go4I 04I 0>/0 59% 620/o 610/oRVF landsK( ii> K nI K. I a II 1W InIc>1 1 ~iI N[ 4 vteitnsII I IIntrnmationAIUnrerstyInstitutefor PubhcOpinion Resarell.Overall how ivell has embargo worked?ci cinbar go a ('ubal hai ijincionado Intly bieri, bicn, HO hiltU qtic lb hi t(1hiCh)hi~1dO riadat) 4 ) eral dri (At \( iiiik thc I S emibar\A cliof Cuba has worked verY well wCII, not veryH 11)t II dli'F req uencies9. Overatll liow well has enmhargo worked?Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentLX) H MLH ELI'(01l i 1(R ) H E L .NY) Ti 111.1. 383 31.9 33.4) 10(L01160I )#~AYI KYt ) 11 Nt) RESI'tflSE 4096.7 I(H).03.3Iis ~l1I ~F requencies9KII II itI ic'iid (~ICI idt85 7.120 17.316.849'17.37.340.9 42.324.767.4)I ettIIl o'(gl44) 3.3121)4)(,tnder ofrenpondcnlhigh tchornIgraduatekit Is39. In nbat icar did iou kair ( uba?j959MAIl 1 1< MAlI than or or I9(,4V~ 1969 1970-I 914) j994I~ 199IsIi(nan 2I"(aUSC/0/4 O/'CrlIhi vt#t21%9%I-..mttrr'I,4.'. 0X3%/htforr21%.79%lalilesAllow to site for seized properny5I). A re y a f U.S.citizen?race Incomecitvzen not t'itizen WhiteBlack orMulattounderS20,000S20-50,000overS50,4000it 1mw iv' sue/ ~r A CIZ i'd)tPf~pt)At'(ii tar 78% 81% 8I~/o 72% 75%/83%/Return to tab le of CoflientsIPR JpOR~ home 11a1eflorida International 1. n \CrsIt\ home paucRe\'Ised Jly 21,- 1 997 by IHugh (Gladwin24. I-..83*,'9.nJ-. 81%22% l9~ '9% 280/c j7%/ 2(10/c 25%/KIPORF ondaI It~ilibis>Instttul*f or Pubhcit!srflt.Opinion Resoareti14. H ow much have you heard abouth elmsAk) t~ ~i ~i-Hro'?I CI) ? III) ~8I de J)FCULII1I8S sObte Ia I lainada 1ev I ICIINS-BUUtOhl 1~riiiwro. quicroi' ('1:1)18I i I I I C 1 I cS~ I it: C>'tII cti;iriIi8 (i(hI tt Ohio Inibini sobic Ia 1ev "S. IcI )b lmuICh() SObIC Ia 1ey, poct)lrms-lBurtonsobre estaV COmo)1evSC s11p)0) q]UC()no ha oido miichoIC\I couple of qI ucstions having to do with the Ielms-IBurton Ia\\, whiclh wasIp);ssedI 1 C (P 21 CNN and si ined by IPrsidcnt Clinton in 996. First. i'd like to ask howxumdi \ Oil h;I\e licaid about the Iclms-B~urton law and how it is supposed to work. HaLveor not heard much at a ab~ott the H ehms-LBurton IaxvFrequencies14. I Iow much have you heard about Hlelmis-Burton?Frequency Percent XValid Percent Cumulative Percent/EI1R/) -I IUI//FE tRill1 Ijil/Ji\OlIIFtRI)I cliii11(7/11 III 1781169)14.897.415.2Iii\l K &\iW\U RFXI~( IA NE(iAN 12114It 'liiiI., 'jul 12011 100.4)K.KIi ha titile.,I s/id659 54.933256.427.7 28.456.484.831I 410.0I OttO2.631 2.6wI a I) le\51)11th Ct ~HI) Iit'ar d ~I I)" LII I I c I iii~- I I ii r I 0 1)f 'tabln'hnational dialogut<9. Ox trail hm4t~rll hn~ emtuirxnvi~.rked?not 4th ~*cII 18-2') 30-44 45-4465 andolder1?))I (~tII( 10*I-/ 1 //K~It tunch ha ICAIitlIlt III)I lillYIfIint'~ /~urii.'tr A11%I I~ 18% 16% 13% 35% 16070 9% IO 0Ibco29%( 0)<013%27%12%)~0'~ / /00 *lhh) II ()Isso 5X 54 0V,0 054)0 0 550I/Il'';2X"0Wi 340 2X"O 31% jfl0~Ill/hi' */iijt/tqiI/I 110)iU ( 1/ 1 / I ~ 12% I5"~ II <0no-11.1Return to table of ContentsIPORI1~( )R Itome p~iue1:1 orida I ziterriational Li fliwfsit\ home __Revised Jiilx' 2 1 997 bx I Iu2h (iladxvin/ I I/on much /uncu; h.artl 1 ,baai-a*1 I &~$i< It III) I I I I CFiend.)nntcannaIUnmnastyInstitutefor PublicI ~i itiIN.I iii! ~I~%Helms-Opinion RnsearcliBurton good or bad as way to bringchange in Cuba?ICC I "I Icin~s-I3ur1on CS tIfla tbIella 0 una mala idea para crewr CflV1bIOScii (VI iIII;I>)\ on Ithm 1he I Ielmns-LBurtou Ia\\ is a iiood idea or a bad idea as a way of IbringiflgauLi C1Ufl12 in (. ba>FrequenciesIS. hlelms-Burton good or bad as way to bring changFrequency Percent V alid Percent Cumulative Percent( (UN) JJ)EY1lNll) /WEA/fl)iEW\'I AAE A T I)IFFERENC'E 312 9.3 11.4 I 00.11979I)tA\~/ A.\IiW Nt) RESIN)ANlE 22181.6 1041.018.4I1AAUIg/~ PIdi1204)/ ~' 'Di /18.4104 LIITableshlelms-Burton good or bad as way to bring chang1 InFt(14;I ~,Ij4 I736 61.3'3'75.2I 0875.213.4 88.6221ri*tinnalultalogur ~, (h~ trail bawwell h.atrmbarzt*""poje fn% (nutwellwell l*-29 30-44 45,44c5 andolder(i ft)N// 11W 1/ lItInt~.. flit tt;~tig k / {'r badMoo.-I119 16".64%4*.t -o21%- U,flo13'84%60Irspip | ll \ S1 \~IlAitj~ vi~1 Ni \( 1 I I ~ I & UmwrmflyInttttutetor PublicOpinion Res*,rcli16. P resident or the U.S. Congress decide whencinhargo ends( biteri cice (I (Icbc teneci la dlutO[ndad die deCii cuando termninara c elnhmargo -- ciIi QSd(ICI1I o ci COI1tICS() de los 1 TI .S~ ('er) \GRISS\KEI 1t H R 35Jotal 1082ifl)\' AAOI A( ) RE SIN)ANE 118.990.23.2 100.0I (IDA)9.8'IX12009.8I 00.0TablesPresident or the U.S. Congress decide when enmbK .4I , N I t 1 1 eIII 'iii ii25978821.665.723.972.823.9tknin4I otal96.8I.',!"?I 4>I tIihI~thnation jfr9 Ut rraII h%,nnell hat rmharr~4) tJI4I%~f Ut.nil! 14th 14 cii IX~29o5 and3fl-*4t.Idtr'tillPHI S//)/24~NI., - 0-- *0/ t~bIrflt Prt#~< / \ 4Ir~ utic *~ Ant/( t)\t~RlXSINIuIlIlIR J O0I .tI)Ie%'resident or the IGender ofNut) ~ en'S.high( ongress decide when emb~tchoolgraduateIes~ 'Is39.In what icar did IOU leave Cuba?'959MA LU FEMALE than or or 19601969 I 97()-1979 1980-1989more te(orci ii tI 'RtiXII)LAi4 frv( oflgr.s ~aetnAK//itI S.' ~ ).\ CR/ASA Lii 111<1?I ~:ibIesPresideuit or the ( ongress decide when emhT4% -'0.*~ *0~'4023*~I023~~~0-.0 too'0.3<0aI 0 J o0-4,',0 40 3 , 0/ftor the'Is21% 26 0<0 29% 23% '9%199w24%0204<023%/10<1030<'066W050<220/o750~.03078%3 %72%40/76%1%750/30Art ~#w a 'SchUrn' raftincumrno'c~IUencii i/en~% biteBlack orMulafloundrrSZO.INHI''U/ / ~t ~isIi III0 2(1% JO',"2% 0'~<0'Is51%33%53%I XLI:250o 23%48%Jo <0PREY24 )O:,~~0-'0 28%23%26%24%24~24 )"'~ -- <0 '9% 26%SI ~hIe~I mi a[rev elect i~ in \ r free inIS' race IncomenutciI(icflcgtiicflWhiteBl~.ck orMulattotinder$20 .4 14 NI S 2(1 - 5(1 ,( H 14)ncrS 541 ,t Ii H IfRI I lilt l/ti\\I If huhK C/nr t.lt.n~dU (rue liiI liLt 1 IRA! IPtflu/I' lilt)lilt' I lWx\ill MA!. I Ht RI!(P\Y)if)-~0~ >0Rciiin~ to table of content SIPOR)0<4- <0 2 0/<0 1%I P( )R lion~e P3UCI iorida 1nten~aiiona1 ~ ni'~ t2VSIty l)OI~flL' p11g5gRevised JIJIN 2 1997 by I Iutrh (iladxunIArt52% 4X0 ~ 54000 no~0'A0 02X043.210o23%23%U Jill/il?no>29%16% 24 I~ 21%neaboInrtttutgfor PublkcI f 1;Opinion Re.,. rcfl18. After Fidel how involved should ties, be inUI):t'~in U1C(iIJ11i~~CflE deS)LeS diC queI 1idel V Ra ;ul (iastro dbadflOflen el poder. crec ci (~ICJeer CIii cstii mt I i n ol tcraido, puce invotucrado 0 nlO deberia jugar ningun papel enI i lCJned i \ alter [idel anid RauI Castro leave power, do yoti think the U nited Statesitld be CIe \no 1I1 OI\ Cw f %hat happens in Cuba,.somewhat involved. or not involved atiil[Frcq uencics18. After Fidel howi iflvedC~ should u .S. be?Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentI ER) INl flU El)W) IEIJ HI I MI GLIB!)\I iN/ N ). I ED1 -I TJAL.LI ttal1671171I )\/ A \l) .\$ N RESPIN)NSE 292')13.997.614.3 100.(I100.4)2.42.41(141.41T ahles 'iii II tr l 1 2(Hlgnn mx nix ed should I *Snit &nn a! diak~uC9.(Ii trill hmiitch hat emhnrg..itorked~l)pl1~"ic fin or mu i% cli 'tell lN~29 3(1-44 45-6465 andolder1.1?)PU (1/ Sb'.1 / /*A if iftcr lid.Iit.,, tnt oh ii/, #i/,f A be.A 0.1//1 ~I\*J (~~I13 00 160 15% 120.I :t b I esAfter I'I(ICI hovi ifl~OI~C(I should I.(;cndcr orreN 1)ttfl denthigh ,ichnolgraduateleNs IfS39.In wbat scar did lOU leave Cuba?1959MALE FEMALE than'ISormoreor 1960-1969 1974)- 1979 1980-1989beroreI S. 1/forI *AkI/1 AI,, ~/ NI ER)IVJ 01 LI)%g) ff<~ JEtI <1 Oil El)IAi Ut 1 Fl)....I F ILl-I 3I)ICSAfter Fidel ho mx oh ed should I.I) CAr0I'll'9)49% CEO2'43 I * 04(1'.3X~\0I IVI 0/ill)I, ill49%35%55%34Q~550~34'O 3100 32%'3% I -o<'0 1500 J30S. be52<033015%50%360o1-1%199055 0/-- <01770<-~ '018%49%38%12034<055 0'-~ -<035%970540/34%I258%26~~160/7048%34%18%.A I)t54K Art iou a I S.cii t/en~race IncomenotcdtitflcitutflBlack orMulattounder/P~ ~/Irr/ t~jt~I /h**I*tiltxhuutI I AAt ). U.. ;e ll.~1 /lAS till Ii)t ~IXI 01 I Fl) 11It,Cttiii~ tO tat) IC' of contentsII k}1\ _____I I orida International Universut~Ofl1C paileRevised JuL 21. 1997 lugh GladwinI Alt')53% 4 ,, 52%521V5(I,(NN)0'3504(1%35%53%34%51%39%530I2'~311%190o 14%33%21%40%'7% I6 <0 NV.K4 bKI~ her10360o3%/46%24%350/28%j9430%44%/27%24%\ Lii JIlL!?45%23%32%34% 039%0'L4/O31% 041%280/c45%24%29%o5%50.Arc ~ou a A,ritz/en ~ race inenmecitlirn1101cit lien%N biteBlack orMulattounderS 24) H N I S 2 (1- 54 1,04 HIo~ ciS5'fl~4HHIjst) tl t)\ftilt'4I 560o 470424) I/hrI nAtthAt /~TCIih'flt"/ hrARUII IA//lit (81111[1111/il?All)0'a- <040< 1%R e t urn to table ol contents1~OR home paucI :iorida I nienuit tOnal I t*ii home pareReused July 21 1997 by I lugh Gladwin41% 44%2X% 26"~39%'026%NFl li/ti?26 0<028%4 <0I3 0'<02X?02'<032%25~.23%3 0//t, 3 0<0 5%IPORh i m dc\rI ~ i~ I tt~I'A 4POR*AFtonaalntema tomulUnivwrsstyInstitutefor Public-I \I'C ~ ii! C I ~ 1 "~ Opinion Researcht20. What effect visit of Pope to Cuba( H I II pa esla oruaniztalnd una \isita a Cuba para ci aflo entrante. Algunos piensan queK itJ hiech Iu ement nra cambios en Cuba. ( tros piciisanl qte Ia visita legitimara al gobierno I I 'O/'t~t It toit ha)i/V JAIlI L(1 111tI<1t I\ U I)ItFEJEK( 52% 52%' Tablcseffect visit of Pope to Cuiba(GendIer orrespondenthigh schoolgraduateless His39. in what year did YOU leave Cuba?'959NiALE FEMALE than or or 196(1-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989more beforeh)RhiILl \Gki('/tt I/vi~if toiil'a?in JR/IlLNIIJ t4 1)l)/t#ERE\( 'E6~I'abIesWhai effect visit of Pope to CubaKfaorAgeYItrJJo 34%'4% '4%1K'5%033<014% 13% 16% 15%48% 58%'3%55% 44%0 55%ittIfhatHS36% 32% 34% 0 34% 34%/1991170;o46%36%11%34%/13%55%11%0380/n55%011%51% 55%/ 49%J3%/49%/54%541.Art 'lou a I A.cit urn'race Incomenutcit Urncitticn~%hitrBlat korMulditounderSZ(Ij)4*Ou~ rr550 JHNI( Ill \ 1Ii 320 0 JX%)jJ ~t ihilrIft> II JAIl'at )RII, niiiit It P(d~ ( ubti54% 51% 540 / 52%K ci urn to table ot contentsIPOR P01?. hOflic JflI2Cliorida International University home P31WRevised JuN 2 1 - 1997 by I high (ladwin340ol500JI JI 014%I)ItiJiRJ:A( I,39'015032I / 0 I4 4, 150048% 5!*tt~'. I'SF londaInt.rnationalInstitutefor PublicS"K1~lesearell.What effect on US economy of embargo end4411(1 more tradeSi I StfldIs 1.JiidOS termmna ci embargo OCOnomUico y comnienza relaciones comercialesc ii ( nba, ()ti clbcto crec I. d. tendra este acontecimiento en Ia economia del str de IaIHiidA" Tendra tn cfecto graiidc, mediano, PCltIenO C) nO lhabra ningun efecto?I I P the iU S ends the economic embargo and resumes normal economic trade with Cuba,x ihil clcet do yOut think this would have on the South Florida economy: a major effect, amleditiI ctbect, a mnior efct. Of nlO effect at all?F requencies21. What effect on I'S economy of embargo end and IFrequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentiIiJ( ii?AWI)It 13UNUR\UKFFHTIi1LI, 167Tota? 1108I)U\"/K.\YliH \t) RE6I)\NE 9292120013.992.314)41.41I(.fl)A)7.7'7-7I. ~10(1.4121I 4 jIitI621 51.8 56.018.322014)1)19.956.)8.375.99.4 84.915.1lPral|997 FlU Cuba IPolI table: 2 1 What etfec.US cconomy of embargo end and more trade http nwww fiw~edu orgs ipor eubapoll Q211ITMTablesWhat effect on US economy of embargo end and more trade7. Establishnational dialogue?9. Overail how wellhas embargoworked?oppose favor not well well 18-29 30-44 45-6465 andolderMAJOR21. W-hat effect onUS economy ofembargo end and156%MEDIUMMINOR57%18% 21%8% 9%0/NO EFFECTA TALL '3% '5%TablesWhat effect on US economy of embargo end and more tradeGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba.MALE FEMALElessthanHISHSormore1959or 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-19beforeMA JOR21. Ithateffect onembargoend and tMEDIUMMINORNOEFFECTA TALLrj~~What effect on US economy of embargo end and more tradeAg55%21%0%!59%15%10%50%26%13%19%59%18%/s12%63%17%6%48%22%'7%16% 11% 11% 14% 24%58%17%11%55%22%8%51%23%6%58%'9%10%53%23%8%52%20%10%145%59%j7%/0%/16% 21%63%17%6%13%56'20W9 (16% 18% 15% '4% 15'WN7 III) Cuba Poll table: 21. What etlec... US economy ot embargo end] and] more trade http: www.tiu.edworgsipor/cubapoll Q21.HITM50. Are you a U.S.citizen?notcitizen ctznraceWhiteIBlack orIMulattounder$20,000income$20-50,000over$50,00021. WiOn Uof emandI IMAJOR 56% 57% 55% 66% 55% 54% 60%lascfetIMEI)IUM -. 20% 20% 20% 18% 20% -20% 19%S economyrbargo end MINOR 9% -8% 9% 10% 7% -10% 11%EFFECT AT 15% 15% 16% 5% 19% 16% 9%ALLReturn to table of contentsOR~IPOR home paueFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Htigh GladwinI9W7 Fil Cuixi Poll table: 22. Allow travel to visit relatives htlp: ;wwwfiu.edu orgsntpor cubapoll Q22.HTMa(ii ckFbimt.Uni'were for notes on reading tablesR eturn to tableInstitutefor Publicof contents Lipiflion RtSealrtn22. Allow travel to visit relativesHoy en dia, los cubanos que viven en los EE.U. pueden visitar parientes en lausando una visa humanitaria. En su opinion, se debe continuar esta clase de visita odlebe descontinuar?22. At present, Cubans who need to visit their relatives in the sland are allowed to enterwith h vmanitarian visas. Should this kind of travel to Cuba be allowed or discontinued?Frequencies22. Allow travel to visit relatives.Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentALLOWEI)I)ISCONTINUEJ) 351 29.3 29.7 1(10.4)Total 1183I)0N'T KNOW/No RESPONSE 1798.6 '00.()1.4AfissingloUd1Total 12(1(11.4100TiblesAllow travel to visit relatives22. slaseVIaid832 69.3 70.3 70.3'71997 FlU Cuba Poll table: 22. Allow travel to visit relattves ht.'w tudog prcbpl 2JT7. Establishnational dialogue?9. Overall howwell has embargoworked?I -~favor not weDl weil 18-29 30-44 45-6465 andolder22. Altw ALLOWED 60% '80%Ira vet to visitrelatives? DISCONTINUED 40% 20% 31% 28% 13% 22%TablesAllow travel to visit relativesGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?MALE FEMALElessthanHSHSormore1959orbefore1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-198922. Al/owtravel toAl LOWE)) 73% 69% 67% 71%visitrelatives? l)ISCONTINUEJ)TablesAllow travel to visit relatives50. Arecvou aU.S.citizen? race mncomecitizennotcitizenWhiteBlack orMulattounder$20,00() S20-50,000overS50.00022. Allowtravel to visitrelatives? l)JSCONUNUED;opposeAge69% 72% 87% 78% | 68% | 56%32% 44%27%64%31% i 33%56%29%/70% 74%44% 30% 26%ALLOWED) 65%/o 81%/a35%77%19% 3j%/69% 70%/31%71%30% 29%http:'www fiuedu orgs iporcubapoll/Q22HTM1997 hU( Cuba 1'olI table: 22. Allow travel to visit relativesReturn to table of contentsIPR~IPOR home pageFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwrnhttp: www.fiwedu orgs'ipor cubapoll Q23.HTM1997 FIU Cuba Poll table: 23. Allow travel jttst to visitFbihitsLniClick here for notes on reading tablesReturn to table of contentsInstitutefor Publicuprnion Researcn23. Allow travel just to visit23. Se deben permitir viajes a Cuba solamente para visitar Ia isla, en vez deespecificamente para visitar a famniliares, SI 0 no?23. Should travel to Cuba, just to visit Cuba, rather than specifically to visit relatives, beallowed or not?Frequencies23. Allow travel just to visit?FrequencyYES, A LLOWED 269Valid NO, NOT ALLOWED 922Total 1191J)ON'T KNO WNO RESPONSE 9M issing-- -----Total 9To1(11 1204)Percent22.476.899.3Valid Percent22.6:Cumulative Percent22.677.4 100.01 (.)i.8- .8100.0TablesAll travel just to visit1997 FRU Cuba I oil table: 23 Allow travel just to visit htip.:www fiuwedu orgsipor cubapoll Q23.HT[M7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overafl how wellhas embargoworked?23. A/low'travel just to"'..YES, ALLOYEDNO, NOTALLOWEDoppose12%88%favor32%68%not well24%76%wellI-20%80%18-2940%60%I 30-4429%71%45-6417%83%I65 andolder11%89%TablesAll travel jus1 to visitGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?lessMALE FEMALE thanHlSHSormore1959or 1960-1969 Li Q'7Q.~, I ~ P - 1980-1989 1990-199before23.A1 howtraveljust t).i .?YES,ALLOW ElNO, NO TALLO lEDTablesAll travel just to visit50. Are you a U.S.citizen?race incomecitizennotcitizen WhiteBlack orMulattounder$20,000 S20-50,000overS50,000YES,23. A llowtr-ave/ justto visit?A L L OYE 1)NO, NOTALLOWEJ)Age25%75%21%79%16%84%25%/75%'7%83%13%87%22%78%/a22%78%3PM690 A25%/ j9%/81%75%/52%48%/21%79%/22%78%27%/73%/-- ,,,- ,-I'' I t J Ubj l'olj tabje~ 2 Allow travel just to visit http. www fiuwedu orgslpor/cubapoll Q23.HITM4Return to table of contentsIPORIIPOR home pageFlorida International University home naoeRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwina1997? Ff1U Cuba IPoII table. 24. Prefer to get newxs in Spanish or in Enghishhtp Cuba ifunlikelycitizen76%notcitizen59%WhiteBlack orMulatto71% 72%IunderI$29,00069%$20-50,000I 70%over$50,00080%mnocraticvernme like4' 24% IReturn to table of contentsIPOR~POR home pageFlorida International Universit y home pflgeRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwinidego 41% 29% 28% 31% 30% 20%997 FI Cuba Poll table: 34A. Would go return to Cuba if both? http://www.fiu.cdu/orgs/ipar/cubapo1L/Q34A.I-rryt~jClick here for notes on reading tablesFlo1IntiUnniInn--- - .. .- . -fpor uwiReturn to table of contents34A. Would go return to Cuba if both?Ahora suponga que ambas situaciones ocurrieran-- que Cuba tuviera unarecuperacidn econdmica y cambiara a un gobiemno democratico, volveria a Cuba a vivir?es muy probable, algo probable, no muy probable o improbable?34 a. What if both happened. -- Cuba changed to a democratic form of government and hada major economic recovery: how likely is it that you would return to Cuba to liveyou say very likely, somewhat likely ,not very likely, or not at all likely?Frequencies34a. Would go return to Cuba if both?332195165482Percent27.716.313.840.21174 97.8IValid Percent28.316.614.141.1100.0ICumulative Percent28.344.958.9100.0DON'T KNOW/NO R ESPONSE. 26Total 261200 100.0Frequencies2.22.234aOpinion ResuUd. diria que- wouldFrequencyVER Y LIKEL YSOMEWHA TLIKELYNOT VERY LIKELYValidINOT A T A LL LIKELYTotalMissingThtaI7 FlU Cuba lPnll table: 34A. Would go return to Cube if both? http://www.fiaedu/orgs/ipor/cube34a. Would go return to Cuba if both?ValidMissingunlikelyPercent647likelymissingTotal1174262653.943.997.82.22.2Valid Percent55.1Cumulative Percent55.1I...Total 1200 I 100.0TablesWould go return to Cuba if both7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overall how wellbas embargo worked?34a. Would goreturn to Cuba ifboth ?unlike4'likelyoppose55%45%favor54%46%not well54%46%well56%44%18-2962%38%30-4457%43%45-6446%I65 aioldeI 5554% 4]TablesWould go return to Cuba if bothAge997 FlU Cubm Poll table: 34A. Would go return to Cuba if both?htIp://www.flaedu/orgsIipor/cubapolI/Q34A.gr~Gender ofrespondentMATEunlikely I47%FEIt &LLEhighgradlesstbnn - - -HS~fschool39. In what year did you leave Cuba?luateHSormore50% 57%1959orbefore71%1960-1969 1970-197960% 55%1980-198946%1990-199737%Cubatfboth?likely 53% 39% 50% 43% I.29% 40% 45% 54% I63%TablesWould go return to Cuba if both3-Ia. Would goreturn iv Cubaunlikely50. ArecitiIcitizen61%you a U.S.zen?not citizen While42%race IncomeBlack orMulatto55%under$20,00056%$20-50,00053% 53%over$50,00065%if both? likelyReturn to tab le of contentsIlPORPOR home DaseFlorida International University home noeRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwin34a.Wouldgoreturn39% 58% 45% 44% 47% 47% 35%~E997 FlU Cuba Poll table: 35. If new gov...nt in Cuba would more people came to US? http://www.fiaedu/args/ipor/cubapall/Q35.HTMI;Click here for notes on reading tablesPloIntiUn'Insforupuuon nesearnReturn to table of contents35. If new government in Cuba would morepeople come to US?Vamos hablar de la gente en Cuba ahora-- Si un nuevo gobiermo tomara e poder y lascosas mejoraran, cual seria Ia probabilidad de que gente que Ud. conoce-- amigos,parnentes -- quisieran venir a E.U avivir? Ud. diria que es muy probable, algo probable,no muy probable o improbable?35. And what about people in Cuba now--if a new government came to power and thingsgot better, how likely is that people you know about, relatives and friends, would come tolive in the United States - would you say very likely somewhat likely not very likely, ornot at all likel-Frequencies35. If new government would more people come to UIVER YLIKEL YSOMEWHA T LIKELYNOT VE RY LIKE LYINOT A T ALL LIKELYTotalDON'T KNO WINO R ESPONSE.MissingTotalFrequency18222328843411277373Percent15.218.624.036.293.96.16.1Valid Percent16.119.825.638.5100.0ICumulative Percent16.135.961.5100.0Total I1200 100.035SValid997i~i Cua olltabe:35. If new gov...nt in Cuba would more people come to US?htp/wwfue/og/orcbolQ3.TFrequencies35. If new government would more people come to USunlikelylikelyTotal72240511277373Percent60.233.893.96.16.1IValid Percent64.135.9100.0Cumulative Percent64.1100.0Total 1200 100.0TablesIf new govern men would more people come to U7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overall how wellhasembargoworked?oppose favor not well Iwell 18-29 30-44 45-6465 andolder35. If new governmentwould more peoplecome to USunlikelylikely69%31%60% |40%64%36%65%35%45% 59%55% 41%71%29%TablesIf new government would more people come to U SFrequencyValidmissingMissingTotalSAgep 74%26%997 FlU Cuba Poll table: 35. If rew gov...nt in Cuba would more people come to US? ht:/w~ieuag/prcbp~/3.TGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?governmentwould morepeople comeunlikelylikelyMALE57%FE MALEy-~.lessthanHSHSormore1959orant..,. -.77%23%:1960-196970%30%1970-197963%37%1980-198966%1990-1559TablesIf new government would more people come to US50. Are you a U.S.citizen? race income35. If newgovernment wouldmore people cometo USunlikelyU kel pcitizen63%37%notcitizen66%34%White64%36%Black orMulatto71%under$20,00065%29%$ 20-50,00065%35% I 35%over$50,00059%41%Return to tab le of contentsIPORIPOR home pageFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwin69% 73% 61%31% 27% I39% 34% 41--Poll table: 36. How feel about decision to depart Nicaraguants http://www.fia~edu/orgs/ipar/cubapa1V/Q36.HTMClick here for notes on readingFlo'ni""lesInstitutefor Publicopinion nesearcn36. How feel about decision to deportNicaraguansRecientemente el gobiemno de los EE.UU. ha propuesto deportar a un gran nnmero denicaraguenses que han vivido en el condado de Dade por muchos afios. EstA de acuerdocon esta politica o en desacuerdo?Recently the U.S government has proposed to deport a large number of Nicaraguanswho have lived in Dade County for a number of years.Frequencies36. How feel about decision to deport Nicaraguans?A GREEDISAGREETotalDON'T KNO WINO RESPONSE.MissingTotalFrequency1319621093107107Percent10.980.291.18.98.9Valid Percent12.088.0100.0Cumulative Percent12.0100.0Total 1200 100.0TablesHow feel about decision to deport NicaraguanstabReturn to table of contents36.36.Do you agree or disagree with thisValid97 FlU Cuba Poll table: 36. How feel about decision to depart Nicaraguans http.//www.fiusdu/orgs/ipar/cubapall/Q36J-ITM7. Establishnational dialogue?9. Overall howwell has embargoworked?favor-"not well well 30-44 L 45-64 65 andolder36. How feel aboutdecision to deportNicaraguans?A GREEDISAGREE12%88%12%88%12% 12%I88% 85%14%86%11%89%TablesHow feel about decision to deport NicaraguansGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?MALE FEMALE*lessthanHSHIsormore1959or 1960-1969 1970-1979before36. How feelabout decisionto deportNicaraguans?AGREEDISAGREE15%85%10%90%8%192%TablesHow feel about decision to deport Nicaraguans50. Are you a U.S.citizen? race IncomecitizenAGREEDISAGREE14%86%notcitizen8%92%White12%S88%Black orMulatto5%95%under10%$20-50,00011%90% 89%IoverI$50,00fl18%82%Age9%/91%1980-1989 113%87%14%86% |11%89%12%88%11%89%36. How feel aboutdecision to deportNicaraguans?)7 FlU Cuba Poll table: 36. How feel about decision to deport Nicaraguansht:/w~iad/rsia/cbpl/3.TReturn to table of contents[iPOR IPOR home pageFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh GladwinFU-IIIsck here for notes on reading tablesInstitutefor PublicReturn to table of contents uprnion Kesearefl50. Are you a U.S. citizen?Es Ud. ciudadano de los EE.UU 7Are you a U.S. citizen?Frequencies50. Are you a U .s. citizen?Validcitizennot citizenFrequency80937711861414Percent67.431.498.8Valid Percent68.231.8100.01.21.268.2100.0100.0TablesAre you a U. S . citizenCl5050Total9.00MissingTotalTotal 1200 |~99 FIUubaPol taic:50.Areyoua US. itienhttp://www.fiuaeduworgs/ipor/cubapI1/Q5O.HTMI~iFI Cuha Poll table: 50. Are you a U.S. citizen? http://www.fiu.edu/orgs/ipor/cubapo11JQ5O.HTM7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overall how wellhas embargo worked?SO. Are you aU.S. citizen?ci.zn4 citizenoppose72%28%favor65%35%not well68%32%weDl68%32%18-2966%34%30-4463%37%45-6465%35%65 andolder79%21%TablesAre you a U.S. citizenGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?FEMALElessthanHSor1959or 1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1997more before5. Are citizen 68% 68% |52% iyou aU.S.citizen?notcitizenI32% 32% ' 48%'i 26% 1I%TablesAre you a U .S. citizen50. Are you a U.S.citizen? raceincomecitizen not citizen WhiteBlack orMulattounder$20,000 $20-50,000over$50,000citizen 100% 100% 1(10% 100% 100% 100%SO. Are you aUS. citizen? not10(1%citizen100% 100% 1(10% 100% 100%AgeVMALEHS74% 89% 90% i 78% 41%10%2%22% 59% 98%II)97 lU tibi Pll tble 50 Ar youa US. itienhtip://wwwfiueduvorgs/iporcubapII/Q5O.HTMReturn to table of contentsElPI IPOR home pageFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwin7 El I Cba 'ofItnbi: 5. Ar yo regsterd t vot'.~http://www.fiuaedu/orgs/ipor/cubapoll/Q51 .H-TMv4,ClPloIntlUn"ick here for notes on reading tablesInstitutefor PublicReturn to table of contents Upinion Kesearell51. Are you registered to vote?. Esti Ud. inscrito para votar en la Florida?Are you registered to vote?Frequencies51. Are you registered to vote?Frequency74166Percent Valid Percent61.8 91.85.5 8.2Cumulative Percent91.8100.0Total 807.00 38967.3 100.032.4Missing DON'T KNOW/NO RESPONSE.Totallotal4393120(1.332.8100.0TablesAre you registered to vote5YES.J~alld NO JSKIP TO 53/IIIhb7 FRU Cuba Poll table: 51. Are you registered to vote? http://www.fia~edu/orgs/ipar/cubapall/Q5 I.HTM7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overall how wellhas embargoworked?51. Are youregistered tovote?oppose94%YES.NO (SKIPTO 53]6%favor90%not weill92%10% 8%iwell93%7%/I18-29I83%30-4493%17%45-6492%7% 8%65 andolder95%ro%TablesAre you registered to voteGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?MALE FEMALEH15HSOrmore1959orIbefore1960-1969 1970-1979 1980-1989 1990-1997YES.S1. AreyOuregisteredtO vote?92%NO(SKIPTO92%8%8%53/89%~ 92% 95% 95% 89%I,11%~ 8%/0 5% 11%ITablesAre you registered to vote50. Are you a U.S.citizen ? race incomecitizennotcitizen WhiteBlack orIMulattounder$20,000$20-50,000over$50,00051.AreyouIregistered tovote?YES.NO (SKIPTO 53192%8%50%50% IAge| 81%19%| 50%50%92% 93% 91%8%93%7%94%9%I--*7%/ 6%!|http://www.tiu.edu/orgs/ipor/cubapoll/Q5 I.HTM7 flU Cuba l'oII table: 51. Arc you registered to vote?!Return to table of contentsIPORIIPOR home pageFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh GladwinClick here for notes on. reading tabFbiIntiUnilesReturn to tab leInstitutefor PublicOninlon Rosaof contents52. Political partyEstA inscrito para votar como Republicano, Demdcrata o como Independiente?Are you registered as a Republican, a Democrat, or an Independent?Frequencies52. Political party?FrequencyREPUBLICANDEMOCRA TINDEPENDENTTotal.00DON'T KNO WINO RESPONSE50011710271945724Percent41.79.88.559.9Valid Percent69.516.314.2100.0Cumulative Percent69.585.8100.038.12.)TotalTotal 120(1 100.0TablesPolitical party52.52.ValidMissing481 40.1P97 I) ubaI~oI tble:52.Polticl prtyhttp://wvwv.fia~edu/orgs/ipar/cubapoll/Q52.HTM7 FHU Cuba 1PolI table: 52. Political party http://www fia~eduorgsipar/cubapoll/Q52.HTM7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overall how wellhas embargoworked?opposeREPUBLICANDEMOCRA TFINDEPENDENT73%13%14%favor not we!*65%*20%15%743179149FLI-F4'-rwell 18-2970% 57%13% 24%17% 20%30-4469%14%17%*45-64I19%S8%S65 andolder72%12%16%TablesPolitical partyGender o:respondenMALE ,FEMI67%18%I15%r high schoolt Igraduateless HS[ALE than orHS more72% 78% 68%15% 14% 17%14% 9% 16%39. In what year did you leave Cuba?1959orbeforeI67%20%13%1960-1969 1970-197974%15%12%70%11%19%1980-1989 1577%15%8%TablesPolitical party50. Are you a U.S.citizen?notcitizen cftze WhiteREPUBLICAN 69% 100% 72%52. --- _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _Political I)EMOCRA T 16% 15%party? -INDEPENDENT 14% 14%race incomeBlack or underMulatto $20,00055% .68%31% 18%14%$20-50,00067%17%14% 16%over$50,00071%15%14%52. PoliticalIparty?AgePoliticalparti'?REPUBLICANDEMO CRA TFINDEPENDENT7 FR Cu~i Pll abl: 52 Poiticl prtyhttp://vwww fiu.edu/orgs/i ar/cubapall/Q52.HTMReturn to table of contentsHIORIPOR home pageFlorida International U~niversitv home nnceRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh GladwinIIIhaoll table: 55. Presidential vote http://www.fia~edu/orgs/ipor/cubapoll/Q55.HTMta 'Click here for notes on reading tables I.IImni"ritinstitutefor PublicReturn to table of contents upmnnon Researcn55. Presidential vote55.DoY [unrdosJ pregunta[s] m~is sobre temas politicos: Me puede decir si vot6 por Bobe o Bill Clinton en la altima elecci6n en Noviembre pasado, 0 si 110 vot6?55. Finally, I have a [couple of] question[s] on political issues: [IF REGISTERED TOVOTE] Could you tell me whether you voted for Bob Dole or Bill Clinton in the electionfor president last November, or did you not vote?Frequencies55. Presidential vote?Frequency366239Percent30.519.9108 9.0Valid Percent51.333.515.1Cumulative Percent51.384.9100.0Jotal 713.00 45959.4 IW).038.3Missing DON'T KNO W/NO R ESPONSElOtUI 40.6Jotal 1200 100.4)TablesI)OLEValidcLINTONOTHER28 2.3487)7 FIUJ Cuba Poll table. 55. Presidential vote httpv'www.fiaedu/orgs/ipor/cubapoll/Q55.HTMPresidential vote7. Establish nationaldialogue?9. Overall how wellhas embargoworked?55. Presidential"ate?DOLECLINTONI 70%30%49%not well59%41%well65%35%18-2942%58%30-4450%45-6436%I65 andolder73%27%TablesPresidential voteGender ofrespondenthigh schoolgraduate39. In what year did you leave Cuba?MALE FEMALE*lessthanHS61% 60% 72%HSormore58%1959or 1960-1969 1970-1979:before56% 69% 63%1980-198954%Presidentialvote? CLINTON 39%TablesPresidential voteWbite Black or Mulatto under $20,000 $20-50,000 over $50,000DOLE55. Presidential vote?CLINTONAge50% 64%- -.n. DOLE40% 28%199042% 44% | 31% 37% 46%race62%income44%38%68%56%56%32%57%44% 43%http://www.fiuxdu/orgs/ipor/cubapdll/Q55J-ITM7 FIU Cube Poll tabie: 55. Presidential votcReturn to table of contentsIPOR___IIPOR home pageFlorida International University home pageRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwin919 Fill Cubl 1'oII table:56. lrmmigration'weifarc changes nEcessaryv http://www.fiu edu/orgs/ipor/cubapoll/Q56.HITMC lick here for notes on readin 2 tablesInstituteReturn to tab lefor Publicof contents opinion Researcn56. Immigration/welfare changes necessary56. Los recientes cambios en las leyes de inmigraci6n y de bienestaren que muchas personas que son residentessocial pueden resultarlegales pierdan los beneficios que han estadorecibiendo del gobierno. En general, cree Ud. que estos cambios a las leyes erannecesarios o no?56. Recent changes in immigration and welfare law s may result in many legal residentslosing government benefits. Overal ,do think these changes were necessary or not?Frequencies56. Immigration/welfare changes necessary?Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative PercentNECESSA R YNoTF NECESSA R YWtE L FA RE CH ANGE OK,IMMIGRA TION Too FA RIMMIGRA TION CH ANGE OK,55WE LFA RE 100 FA RTotal 1112DON'T KNOW/NO RESPONSE 884.6 4.9 100.092.7.7.3MissingTtattJ 881204)7.310(1.4)FIII"ala'396 33.')61635.651.3 55.-I45 3.835.691.1)95.14.0I'I fatal7 FlU Cuba Poll table: 56. Immigration/welfare changes necessary http://www.fiu.edu/orgs/ipor/cubapall/Q56.HTMTablesImmigration/welfare changes necessary7 . Establishnationaldialogue?9. Overallhow well hasembargoworked?NECESSARYNOT NECESSARYWELFARECH ANGE OK,IMMIGRA TIONTOO FA RIMMIGRA iONCHANGE OK,WELFARE TOOFARoppose37%54%3%favo560,5%notr well36%VI%ol 4%'3% 6%well F 18-29 30-44.6%3 9%56% 56%4%1%5% .3%39%/52%I4%4%45-4434%3%)6%65 andF %3Ir33%55%cc,.3/0-7%TablesImmigration/welfare changes necessaryIIIIIAgeS6.1mm igration/welfarechanges necessary?/ FIU Cuba Poll table: 56. Immigration/welfare changes necessary http://www.frn.edu/orgs/ipor/cubapall/Q56.HTMGender ofreapMALE39%52%4%ondentFEMALE57%4%5%high schoolgraduatelessthan~HS31%HS 1959orbefore38% 44%53%h60%I -3%6%4%5%39. In what year did you let1960-196936%55%5%44%7%5% 4%II-30%62%6%TablesImmigration/welfare changes necessary*50.AreyouaU.S. citizen? race IncomeIcitizen38%53%5%notcitizen32%60%2%White:35%S56%Black orMulatto35%60%4%under$20,000I 35%55%4%2%I$20-50,00037%53%5%*over$50,00043%51%4%IMMIGRA THONCHANGE OK,WELFARE TY90FA RK-NECESSARYNOTNECESSARY56.Immigration/welfareWELFAREchanges necessary?CH ANGE OK,IMMIGRA TIONTOO FA RIMMIGRA TIONCHANGE OK,WELFARE TOOFARNECESSA RYNOTNECESSA R Y56.Jmmzigration/welfareWELFAREchanges necessan'?CH LANGE OK,IMMIGRATHONTOO FA R4% 6%! 5% 2% 5% 6% 2%07 FIUi Cuba Poll ta ble: 56. Immigration/welfare changes recessary ht:/w~ieuog/prcbpII5.TReturn to table of contentsIPORIPOR home pageFlorida International University home pagzeRevised July 21, 1997 by Hugh Gladwin

The 1993 FIU Cuba Poll

Abstract

Extracted data

The 1993 FIU Cuba Poll

Abstract

Extracted data

Related items

Related items