We show how bounds around preferences parameters can be estimated under various levels of assumptions concerning the beliefs of senders in the investment game. We contrast these bounds with point estimates of the preference parameters obtained using non-incentivized subjective belief data. Our point estimates suggest that expected responses and social preferences both play a significant role in determining investment in the game. Moreover, these point estimates fall within our most reasonable bounds. This suggests that credible inferences can be obtained using non-incentivized beliefs
This paper analyzes the problem of estimation and inference of the payoff parameters in a static gam...
We investigate how distorted, yet structured, beliefs can persist in strategic situations. Specifica...
The risk and ambiguity inherent to many decisions tend to resolve over time as more information beco...
We show how bounds around preferences parameters can be estimated under various levels of assumption...
This paper examines the preference-based approach to the identification of beliefs. It focuses on th...
We show how to bound the effect of belief-dependent preferences on choices in sequential two-player ...
We combine the choice data of proposers and responders in the ultimatum game, their expectations eli...
This Zenodo project contains the files necessary to replicate the results of our study "Measuring be...
We test the empirical content of the assumption of preference dependent beliefs using a behavioral m...
This paper deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about...
In this paper we study identification and inference of preference parameters in a single-agent, stat...
In this paper, we study choice under uncertainty with belief functions on a set of outcomes as objec...
Game theoretic predictions about equilibrium behavior depend upon assumptions of inflexibility of be...
This paper develops a new method informed by data and models to recover information about investor b...
[eng] We use a large public dataset of proposer-responder games to examine other-regarding preferenc...
This paper analyzes the problem of estimation and inference of the payoff parameters in a static gam...
We investigate how distorted, yet structured, beliefs can persist in strategic situations. Specifica...
The risk and ambiguity inherent to many decisions tend to resolve over time as more information beco...
We show how bounds around preferences parameters can be estimated under various levels of assumption...
This paper examines the preference-based approach to the identification of beliefs. It focuses on th...
We show how to bound the effect of belief-dependent preferences on choices in sequential two-player ...
We combine the choice data of proposers and responders in the ultimatum game, their expectations eli...
This Zenodo project contains the files necessary to replicate the results of our study "Measuring be...
We test the empirical content of the assumption of preference dependent beliefs using a behavioral m...
This paper deals with the identification and estimation of dynamic games when players’ beliefs about...
In this paper we study identification and inference of preference parameters in a single-agent, stat...
In this paper, we study choice under uncertainty with belief functions on a set of outcomes as objec...
Game theoretic predictions about equilibrium behavior depend upon assumptions of inflexibility of be...
This paper develops a new method informed by data and models to recover information about investor b...
[eng] We use a large public dataset of proposer-responder games to examine other-regarding preferenc...
This paper analyzes the problem of estimation and inference of the payoff parameters in a static gam...
We investigate how distorted, yet structured, beliefs can persist in strategic situations. Specifica...
The risk and ambiguity inherent to many decisions tend to resolve over time as more information beco...