Add to ORKGThis Comment will briefly discuss California\u27s community property system, and the standards traditionally required by the Supreme Court for federal pre-emption of state property law. It will also examine the Supreme Court\u27s interpretation of the Railroad Retirement Act which led the Court to conclude that the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution and demanded federal pre-emption in this case. It will discuss the Hisquierdo test for federal pre-emption, which the Supreme Court has since used to override state community property systems. Finally, it will evaluate whether the case was correctly decided
When the Supreme Court decided Poe v. Seaborn in 1930, it did not foresee the mischief its decision ...
In 1981, the Supreme Court rendered a decision prohibiting state courts from dividing, as marital pr...
A senselessly rigid interpretation of a provision in the Texas consititution referring to a married ...
This Comment will briefly discuss California\u27s community property system, and the standards tradi...
In 1984, California had the simplest laws regarding interspousal transmutations of real and personal...
In the years 1942-1948, the community property system wusadopted by state legislatures in Oregon, Ne...
The statute which creates the husband-wife contract commonly referred to as the community property a...
A book review essay considering Principles of Community Property, 2d ed., by William Q. deFuniak and...
This Article examines whether the law forbidding division of certain federal pension benefits betwee...
This Article examines the California rule that property cannot be both joint tenancy and community p...
This Comment examines the recent amendments to the California Civil Code, which require that, at div...
Many cases were decided in the field of real property during the period covered by the survey, but v...
This Comment examines the progressive step the California legislature took in 1973 by amending the C...
This article discusses a California Supreme Court case which held that restrictions in an amended de...
This article discusses a California case which held that a husband’s separate property interest ...
When the Supreme Court decided Poe v. Seaborn in 1930, it did not foresee the mischief its decision ...
In 1981, the Supreme Court rendered a decision prohibiting state courts from dividing, as marital pr...
A senselessly rigid interpretation of a provision in the Texas consititution referring to a married ...
This Comment will briefly discuss California\u27s community property system, and the standards tradi...
In 1984, California had the simplest laws regarding interspousal transmutations of real and personal...
In the years 1942-1948, the community property system wusadopted by state legislatures in Oregon, Ne...
The statute which creates the husband-wife contract commonly referred to as the community property a...
A book review essay considering Principles of Community Property, 2d ed., by William Q. deFuniak and...
This Article examines whether the law forbidding division of certain federal pension benefits betwee...
This Article examines the California rule that property cannot be both joint tenancy and community p...
This Comment examines the recent amendments to the California Civil Code, which require that, at div...
Many cases were decided in the field of real property during the period covered by the survey, but v...
This Comment examines the progressive step the California legislature took in 1973 by amending the C...
This article discusses a California Supreme Court case which held that restrictions in an amended de...
This article discusses a California case which held that a husband’s separate property interest ...
When the Supreme Court decided Poe v. Seaborn in 1930, it did not foresee the mischief its decision ...
In 1981, the Supreme Court rendered a decision prohibiting state courts from dividing, as marital pr...
A senselessly rigid interpretation of a provision in the Texas consititution referring to a married ...