The legislative history of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 is scrutinized to determine the factual predicate that led to the enactment of 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) and the classes Congress sought to protect under its provisions. The legislative history is also analyzed to determine which rights Congress sought to protect in § 1985(3). Part III discusses the Supreme Court\u27s misinterpretation of the statute and attempts to provide guidance as to the proper outcome in Bray
The Civil Rights Act of 18711 ( § 1983 ) establishes a tort-like remedy for persons deprived of fede...
This Note argues that the Fourth Circuit's narrow interpretation of the Act's public accommodations ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S. C.A.) (the 19 Act) likely has had the greatest transformative ...
The legislative history of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 is scrutinized to determine the factual pred...
During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases cons...
Since Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, courts continue to grapple with identifying what...
Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code (originally, and more colorfully, known as Sectio...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s landmark decision in Runyon v. McCrary interpreted section one ...
Plaintiffs, black children, were denied admission to defendants\u27 private schools solely on the ba...
The right to choose abortion, although recently significantly curtailed from its original scope,\u27...
Over the course of seven months in 1871, Congress did something extraordinary for the time: It liste...
If the Supreme Court is willing to learn from past mistakes, the Court would find it particularly in...
In 1971 the United States Supreme Court held in Griffin v. Breckenridge that 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) co...
Following the end of the Civil War, the 39th Congress met to consider legislative proposals that wou...
The Civil Rights Act of 18711 ( § 1983 ) establishes a tort-like remedy for persons deprived of fede...
This Note argues that the Fourth Circuit's narrow interpretation of the Act's public accommodations ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S. C.A.) (the 19 Act) likely has had the greatest transformative ...
The legislative history of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871 is scrutinized to determine the factual pred...
During the period covered by this survey, most of the constitutional law and civil rights cases cons...
Since Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, courts continue to grapple with identifying what...
Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code (originally, and more colorfully, known as Sectio...
42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) was enacted\u27 to curtail the Ku Klux Klan\u27s terrorist activities in the Sou...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s landmark decision in Runyon v. McCrary interpreted section one ...
Plaintiffs, black children, were denied admission to defendants\u27 private schools solely on the ba...
The right to choose abortion, although recently significantly curtailed from its original scope,\u27...
Over the course of seven months in 1871, Congress did something extraordinary for the time: It liste...
If the Supreme Court is willing to learn from past mistakes, the Court would find it particularly in...
In 1971 the United States Supreme Court held in Griffin v. Breckenridge that 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) co...
Following the end of the Civil War, the 39th Congress met to consider legislative proposals that wou...
The Civil Rights Act of 18711 ( § 1983 ) establishes a tort-like remedy for persons deprived of fede...
This Note argues that the Fourth Circuit's narrow interpretation of the Act's public accommodations ...
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S. C.A.) (the 19 Act) likely has had the greatest transformative ...