The author, perhaps the nation\u27s top authority on prosecutorial misconduct, raises and analyzes two questions: Why does this misconduct occur? (It often pays off.) And why does it continue? (There are no effective sanctions.
A gross manifestation of injustice within the criminal justice system, warranting policy development...
A hot controversy exists about the reliability of forensic science as reported by prime-time drama t...
There has been significant and increasing attention to prosecutorial accountability for misconduct i...
The author, perhaps the nation\u27s top authority on prosecutorial misconduct, raises and analyzes t...
Professor Gershman critically examines a series of recent Supreme Court decisions dealing with prose...
The United States Supreme Court, in Darden v. Wainwright, stated that where the error is forensic in...
A prosecutor is viewed by the public as a powerful law enforcement official whose responsibility is ...
This article is the first of two articles that discuss the concern of prosecutorial misconduct. This...
This article explores the legal profession\u27s failure to hold prosecutors accountable for miscondu...
Trial prosecutors’ visible misbehavior, such as improper questioning of witnesses and improper jury ...
This Article explores the unfortunately large number of instances in which appellate courts reverse ...
Although courts have traditionally relied primarily on prosecutors’ individual self-restraint and in...
While most prosecutors adhere to the maxim that their primary task is to obtain just results, there ...
This Article argues that a prosecutor\u27s intent is always relevant to the courts\u27 analysis of m...
For decades, legal commentators sounded the alarm about the tremendous power wielded by prosecutors....
A gross manifestation of injustice within the criminal justice system, warranting policy development...
A hot controversy exists about the reliability of forensic science as reported by prime-time drama t...
There has been significant and increasing attention to prosecutorial accountability for misconduct i...
The author, perhaps the nation\u27s top authority on prosecutorial misconduct, raises and analyzes t...
Professor Gershman critically examines a series of recent Supreme Court decisions dealing with prose...
The United States Supreme Court, in Darden v. Wainwright, stated that where the error is forensic in...
A prosecutor is viewed by the public as a powerful law enforcement official whose responsibility is ...
This article is the first of two articles that discuss the concern of prosecutorial misconduct. This...
This article explores the legal profession\u27s failure to hold prosecutors accountable for miscondu...
Trial prosecutors’ visible misbehavior, such as improper questioning of witnesses and improper jury ...
This Article explores the unfortunately large number of instances in which appellate courts reverse ...
Although courts have traditionally relied primarily on prosecutors’ individual self-restraint and in...
While most prosecutors adhere to the maxim that their primary task is to obtain just results, there ...
This Article argues that a prosecutor\u27s intent is always relevant to the courts\u27 analysis of m...
For decades, legal commentators sounded the alarm about the tremendous power wielded by prosecutors....
A gross manifestation of injustice within the criminal justice system, warranting policy development...
A hot controversy exists about the reliability of forensic science as reported by prime-time drama t...
There has been significant and increasing attention to prosecutorial accountability for misconduct i...