In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore the contract principles and public policy considerations that are implicated by an insurer’s breach of its defense duty; (2) consider recent case law addressing relevant issues; and (3) recommend a comprehensive approach that accommodates competing interests. Ultimately, the author concludes that in most circumstances an insurer that wrongfully disclaims its duty to defend should be precluded from raising defenses as to coverage in an action to indemnify the insured for monies paid out by the insured
Plaintiff, having recovered a judgment against insured defendant for injuries sustained in an automo...
P, the insured under a public liability insurance policy with D, had been sued by an injured party; ...
This article examines the insured\u27s right to settle when the insurer purports to fully defend, bu...
In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore ...
This article examines the right of a liability insurer to control the defense of its insured, the du...
An insurer\u27s duty to defend in connection with liability insurance policies is well-established a...
This Note explores the consequences of an insurer’s breach of the duty to defend under Missouri case...
In liability insurance, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to cover. Thus it is possible th...
For years the conflict of interest problem that occasionally arose out of the defense of an insured ...
When a liability insurer defends claims brought against its insured, its interests frequently come i...
Each year in America, an estimated $200 billion is spent purchasing third-party liability insurance....
In a previous paper, I suggested that the Missouri Supreme Court had adopted a forfeiture penalty fo...
Most Americans and American businesses purchase liability insurance to protect against financial los...
Possibly the most important decision in the insurance field in 1968 involved not the rights and obli...
A liability insurer has issued a policy, reserving the sole right to effect a settlement, and refuse...
Plaintiff, having recovered a judgment against insured defendant for injuries sustained in an automo...
P, the insured under a public liability insurance policy with D, had been sued by an injured party; ...
This article examines the insured\u27s right to settle when the insurer purports to fully defend, bu...
In pursuit of a greater understanding of this controversial subject, this article will: (1) explore ...
This article examines the right of a liability insurer to control the defense of its insured, the du...
An insurer\u27s duty to defend in connection with liability insurance policies is well-established a...
This Note explores the consequences of an insurer’s breach of the duty to defend under Missouri case...
In liability insurance, the duty to defend is broader than the duty to cover. Thus it is possible th...
For years the conflict of interest problem that occasionally arose out of the defense of an insured ...
When a liability insurer defends claims brought against its insured, its interests frequently come i...
Each year in America, an estimated $200 billion is spent purchasing third-party liability insurance....
In a previous paper, I suggested that the Missouri Supreme Court had adopted a forfeiture penalty fo...
Most Americans and American businesses purchase liability insurance to protect against financial los...
Possibly the most important decision in the insurance field in 1968 involved not the rights and obli...
A liability insurer has issued a policy, reserving the sole right to effect a settlement, and refuse...
Plaintiff, having recovered a judgment against insured defendant for injuries sustained in an automo...
P, the insured under a public liability insurance policy with D, had been sued by an injured party; ...
This article examines the insured\u27s right to settle when the insurer purports to fully defend, bu...