Add to ORKGMy responses to seven critical reviews of my book *Mental Files* (OUP 2012) published in a special issue of the journal Disputatio, edited by F. Salis. The reviewers are: Keith Hall, David Papineau, Annalisa Coliva and Delia Belleri, Peter Pagin, Thea Goodsell, Krista Lawlor and Manuel Garcia-Carpintero
Marc Jeannerod and I wrote a Précis of our 2003 book Ways of Seeing. The journal Dialogue asked Tim ...
AbstractThis is the author's reply to three very different reviews of Mind As Machine: A history of ...
To appear in Inquiry (book symposium on *Mental Files*).A response to three critics, for the Inquiry...
My responses to seven critical reviews of my book *Mental Files* (OUP 2012) published in a special i...
To appear in K. Korta and M. Ponte (eds.) Reference and Representation in Language and Thought. Oxfo...
François Recanati has written a valuable and timely book. The sug-gestion that thought involves the ...
As one of the major figures in the philosophy of language and mind during a quarter of a century, Fr...
It is increasingly common for a thinker’s capacity for singular thought to be described in terms of ...
Over the past fifty years the philosophy of language and mind has been dominated by a nondescriptivi...
An increasing number of philosophers use the mental file metaphor to illuminate singular thinking. D...
It is often supposed that we can make progress understanding singular thought about objects by claim...
none1noThrough the years, François Recanati has developed a large and coherent picture of language a...
In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put ...
How seriously should we take the idea that the mind employs mental files? Goodman and Gray (2022) ar...
We argue that the most ambitious version of the mental files theory of singular thought, according t...
Marc Jeannerod and I wrote a Précis of our 2003 book Ways of Seeing. The journal Dialogue asked Tim ...
AbstractThis is the author's reply to three very different reviews of Mind As Machine: A history of ...
To appear in Inquiry (book symposium on *Mental Files*).A response to three critics, for the Inquiry...
My responses to seven critical reviews of my book *Mental Files* (OUP 2012) published in a special i...
To appear in K. Korta and M. Ponte (eds.) Reference and Representation in Language and Thought. Oxfo...
François Recanati has written a valuable and timely book. The sug-gestion that thought involves the ...
As one of the major figures in the philosophy of language and mind during a quarter of a century, Fr...
It is increasingly common for a thinker’s capacity for singular thought to be described in terms of ...
Over the past fifty years the philosophy of language and mind has been dominated by a nondescriptivi...
An increasing number of philosophers use the mental file metaphor to illuminate singular thinking. D...
It is often supposed that we can make progress understanding singular thought about objects by claim...
none1noThrough the years, François Recanati has developed a large and coherent picture of language a...
In this work I reply to Zoltán Vecsey’s criticisms of the semantic account of fictional names I put ...
How seriously should we take the idea that the mind employs mental files? Goodman and Gray (2022) ar...
We argue that the most ambitious version of the mental files theory of singular thought, according t...
Marc Jeannerod and I wrote a Précis of our 2003 book Ways of Seeing. The journal Dialogue asked Tim ...
AbstractThis is the author's reply to three very different reviews of Mind As Machine: A history of ...
To appear in Inquiry (book symposium on *Mental Files*).A response to three critics, for the Inquiry...