The attempt to recover the international origins of social and political thought is motivated by the unsatisfactory fragmentation of modern knowledge – by its failure to account for the intimate connections between theory and history in general and its international dimension in particular – and seeks to overcome these divides. This article provides an analysis of the theory/history divide and its role for the fragmentation of modern knowledge. Theoretically, it shows, this divide is rooted in, and reproduced by, the epistemic foundations of modern knowledge. Historically, the modern episteme arises from a crisis of imperial politics in the 18th century. This analysis suggests that theory, history, and the international are products rather ...
Although most attempts to foster interdisciplinary dialogue are located outside mainstream IR, this ...
Can international relations (IR) be a distinctive discipline? In the present paper I argue that such...
International history as a discipline has a solid and lasting background. This article identifies tw...
This article introduces the main themes that animate this special issue: the necessary entanglement ...
On one level, history is used by all parts of the International Relations (IR) discipline. But lurki...
This article addresses the relationship between history and the international. Starting from the ‘hi...
What would it mean to construct a post-imperial discipline rather than a ‘post-Western’ one? ‘Post-i...
This article argues that the discipline of world history, with its interdisciplinary ties to the soc...
This essay examines the relationship between history and theory through a historical and political a...
The recent transnational, global and cultural turns have challenged international historians to reco...
It is a truism to say that the discipline of international relations (IR) is primarily concerned wit...
Although most attempts to foster interdisciplinary dialogue are located outside mainstream IR, this ...
This chapter discusses how key questions in the practice of intellectual history tie in with the pre...
Politics and International Relations (IR) tend to be discussed as separate disciplines. Rather than ...
Although most attempts to foster interdisciplinary dialogue are located outside mainstream IR, this ...
Can international relations (IR) be a distinctive discipline? In the present paper I argue that such...
International history as a discipline has a solid and lasting background. This article identifies tw...
This article introduces the main themes that animate this special issue: the necessary entanglement ...
On one level, history is used by all parts of the International Relations (IR) discipline. But lurki...
This article addresses the relationship between history and the international. Starting from the ‘hi...
What would it mean to construct a post-imperial discipline rather than a ‘post-Western’ one? ‘Post-i...
This article argues that the discipline of world history, with its interdisciplinary ties to the soc...
This essay examines the relationship between history and theory through a historical and political a...
The recent transnational, global and cultural turns have challenged international historians to reco...
It is a truism to say that the discipline of international relations (IR) is primarily concerned wit...
Although most attempts to foster interdisciplinary dialogue are located outside mainstream IR, this ...
This chapter discusses how key questions in the practice of intellectual history tie in with the pre...
Politics and International Relations (IR) tend to be discussed as separate disciplines. Rather than ...
Although most attempts to foster interdisciplinary dialogue are located outside mainstream IR, this ...
Can international relations (IR) be a distinctive discipline? In the present paper I argue that such...
International history as a discipline has a solid and lasting background. This article identifies tw...