[Comment] I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorporate public values, but I see their role differently. Philosophers of science standardly distinguish between values being introduced in the context of discovery (inputs into the investigation or arguments) and in the context of justification (acceptance or rejection of substantive claims in light of the arguments or investigation). I argue that de Shalit is wrong to put the public values in the context of discovery; with respect to normative theories (such as political theories), the values should be introduced in the context of justification. [Open access
Scientists are frequently called upon to “democratize” science, by bringing the public into scientif...
The traditional view holds that political philosophy should aim at the truth. By contrast, Avner de ...
Public reason theorists argue that it is permissible for the state to enforce political norms, such ...
[Comment] I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorpor...
[Comment] I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorpor...
I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorporate public...
Many philosophers of science have argued that social and ethical values have a significant role to p...
Philosophers of science now broadly agree that doing good science involves making non-epistemic valu...
Rawlsian idea of public reason refers to the boundaries on political justification of coercive laws ...
Abstract: This article argues that the public reason tradition of political normativity is flawed. A...
There is a growing consensus among philosophers of science that core parts of the scientific process...
It is increasingly accepted by philosophers of science that values influence the scientific process....
Criticism of the value-free ideal has motivated attempts to formulate a criterion for the legitimacy...
In the last two decades, a robust consensus has emerged among philosophers of science, according to ...
Scientists are frequently called upon to “democratize” science, by bringing the public into scientif...
The traditional view holds that political philosophy should aim at the truth. By contrast, Avner de ...
Public reason theorists argue that it is permissible for the state to enforce political norms, such ...
[Comment] I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorpor...
[Comment] I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorpor...
I am sympathetic to Avner de Shalit’s position that a political philosophy should incorporate public...
Many philosophers of science have argued that social and ethical values have a significant role to p...
Philosophers of science now broadly agree that doing good science involves making non-epistemic valu...
Rawlsian idea of public reason refers to the boundaries on political justification of coercive laws ...
Abstract: This article argues that the public reason tradition of political normativity is flawed. A...
There is a growing consensus among philosophers of science that core parts of the scientific process...
It is increasingly accepted by philosophers of science that values influence the scientific process....
Criticism of the value-free ideal has motivated attempts to formulate a criterion for the legitimacy...
In the last two decades, a robust consensus has emerged among philosophers of science, according to ...
Scientists are frequently called upon to “democratize” science, by bringing the public into scientif...
The traditional view holds that political philosophy should aim at the truth. By contrast, Avner de ...
Public reason theorists argue that it is permissible for the state to enforce political norms, such ...